Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans to Democrats: Quit blaming Bush. Besides, it was Carter's fault.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 05:33 AM
Original message
Republicans to Democrats: Quit blaming Bush. Besides, it was Carter's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Democrat to Republicans ...
Bite me. Bush was a lying, heartless sociopath. Carter may not have been the most dynamic man in the world, but at least he had a conscience and cared about his fellow man giving of his time and effort long after he left office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Best President of my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Damn Strait, he was the best of my 62 plus years of life, bar none
President Carter is where the :puke:s sharpened their teeth. He WAS/IS a good man and would have been a great President except for the :puke:s in congress and the mass media who were mostly by then in the pockets of big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rocktivity to Republicans: Bush Blamed Clinton--remember?
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 07:57 AM by rocktivity
I could make bigger donations to DU if I didn't have to keep buying new bullshit meters.

:nuke:
rocktivity

P.S. Consider the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I know the source well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. If is so great why didn't Republican's fix it then....Raygun, Bush & Shrub....seems
http://www.fpif.org/articles/nuclear_recycling_fails_the_test

<snip>
In order to recycle uranium and plutonium in power plants, spent fuel has to be treated to chemically separate these elements from other highly radioactive byproducts. As it chops and dissolves used fuel rods, a reprocessing plant releases about 15 thousand times more radioactivity into the environment than nuclear power reactors and generates several dangerous waste streams. If placed in a crowded area, a few grams of waste would deliver lethal radiation doses in a matter of seconds. They also pose enduring threats to the human environment for tens of thousands of years.
<snip>

Although the U.S. continued to reprocess spent fuel from military reactors, the “once through” fuel cycle was adopted by President Carter in 1977 for commercial nuclear power. Three years earlier, India had exploded a nuclear weapon using plutonium separated from power reactor spent fuel at a reprocessing facility. President Ford responded in 1976 by suspending reprocessing in the United States. President Carter converted the suspension into a ban, while issuing a strong international policy statement against establishing plutonium as fuel in global commerce. President Carter’s decision reversed some 20 years of active promotion by DOE’s predecessor, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), of the “closed” nuclear fuel cycle. The AEC had spent billions of dollars in an attempt to commercialize reprocessing technology to recycle uranium and provide plutonium fuel for use in “fast” nuclear power reactors.
<snip>

<snip>
Recycling advocates are seeking to overturn this long-standing policy and point to a new generation of “fast” reactors to breakdown plutonium so it can’t be used in weapons. Since the 1940’s, it was understood that “fast” reactors generate more subatomic particles, known as neutrons, than conventional power plants and it is neutrons which split uranium atoms to produce energy in conventional reactors. The U.S. actively promoted plutonium-fueled fast reactors for decades because of the potential abundance of neutrons, declaring that they held the promise of producing electricity and making up to 30 percent more plutonium than they consumed.

With design changes, fast reactors are, ironically, being touted in the U.S. as a means to get rid of plutonium. However, the experience with “fast reactors” over the past 50 years is laced with failure. At least 15 “fast” reactors have been closed due to costs and accidents in the U.S., France, Germany, England, and Japan. There have been two fast reactor fuel meltdowns in the United States including a mishap near Detroit in the 1960’s. Russia operates the remaining fast reactor, but it has experienced 15 serious fires in 23 years.
<snip>

Okay its appears it wasn't worth the risk....tried, failed and all we have is more radioactive pollution. People seem to forget Carter was a nuclear engineer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC