Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP Purchases 32 of Kevin Costner's Oil-Water Separation Machines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:09 AM
Original message
BP Purchases 32 of Kevin Costner's Oil-Water Separation Machines
http://gizmodo.com/5565816/bp-purchases-32-of-kevin-costners-oil+water-separation-machines

Laugh you may have when you heard that Kevin Costner was stepping into BP's oil spill disaster with a potential solution, but BP has now snapped up 32 of the centrifuge machines to help separate the oil from the water.

The technology was created by Costner's brother, with the actor pumping in $20m over 15 years. While 40,000 barrels worth of oil is leaking into the gulf of Mexico each day, the V20 machine can clean up 200 gallons of water a minute.




Think about that. $20M to develop this. Think if the industry/government for years had been investing a couple of billion in cleanup technology knowing that one day there was bound to be another disaster. We wouldn't be working with 1970's equipment right now. Imagine what we could have had at our disposal.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I will forgive Costner for Waterworld if his machines clean up the ocean.
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I was thinking the same thing
:evilgrin: Hope they make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. LOL
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:24 AM by FLPanhandle
I haven't liked any of his movies really, but this makes up for the hours spent watching them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. here's hoping that it works really well
cause that job is going to be enormous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. I always did like that guy, and not just for his good looks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. screw that
think about what if the Government was investing in alternative technology. The only truly effective cleanup technology is preventing it in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. True. but production alternative energy technology will be expensive
It should be done anyway. I would like to see a "Manhattan Project" mentality applied to alternative energy.

However, safety and cleanup technology could have been developed really cheap. So cheap that even a Hollywood actor can afford to do it. It's almost criminal it wasn't done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hey, sitting around with grips at Raleigh studio can pay off one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. 200 gallons / minute = 6,857 barrels of oil/water per day per machine
x 32 machines = 219,429 barrels per day capacity if 24 hour operation (obviously not possible)

If operated productively for 8 hours per day, and if the oil/water mix that is processed is 10% oil/90% water, it would be 7,314 barrels per day of oil removed. If they find concentrations of 30%, that number would be over 20,000 barrels per day.
Which would be a pretty significant contribution if it works. Good on the Costners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC