On "Political Will" ..........

[marmar]

"If 'savage' was the magic word for colonialists, "political will" is the fairy dust of today's democracy. When change fails to happen, it is for want of "political will," a sort of magic powder that stirs the powerful to action (even if the action ends up being merely 'rinse and repeat'). What contemporary ideas of "political will" betray, more than anything, is our own ambivalence about government. The public at large have more than enough political will for health care, for education, for reduced spending on weapons, or for the environment. It's just that, all too often, the abundant will of government representatives is shaped by a corporate agenda, rather than a popular one. In Italy, one of the best-selling books of recent years is La Casta (The Cast), a political expose by senior journalists Sergio Rizzo and Gian Antonio Stella that portrays the political establishment as a club of more or less well-meaning kleptocrats. When government really is a caste apart, it seems there's little that can be done to bring them back to earth except, as history suggests, through widespread civic engagement. Curiously, in one of the more cited studies of what make bureaucracies work for people, Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work, a key factor in Italy has been the presence of the Communist Party.

While the Italian Communist Party may seem a rather unlikely and remote source of hope, its 1970s foot soldiers knew something that has largely been forgotten in Western democracies - that the passivity of the majority is what allows the powerful to rule. It is in this insight that we can find the rocket fuel for Polanyi's double movement. The second part of the double movement, where society reclaims power from the market, happens through demand, not gift. In a sense, this was the promise of the Obama election campaign. The slogans of "No more politics as usual" resonated, as well it should, with disenfranchised people around the world, not just in the United States.

There is, however, a difference between rousing campaign rallies and widespread democracy. The Obama administration is, for instance, firing up the campaign machinery that first got him elected, to push his agenda on education, health care and climate change. One of the characteristics of the new campaign meetings is the lack of time for questioning the substance of these policies - there's just one enemy: "politics as usual" - and just one solution: the president's new politics. The proper name for this is populism. The cult pact between leader and led isn't, however, a sign of reinvigorated democracy - it's the last desperate substitute for it. For democracy to flourish, we need our own moment of admission that our economic system has failed us. Just as Greenspan lost faith in an economic organizing principle, we also need to take a long hard look not only at the free market but at the political system that supports it. It's in reclaiming the idea that we're able to think for ourselves and that we're ready for politics, rather than outsourcing it like so much else, that we will be able to reclaim both democracy and our economy."

- from The Value of Nothing: How to reshape market society and redefine democracy by Raj Patel

[xchrom]

1. recommend