Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Warns Of 'Massive Layoffs Of Teachers, Police, And Firefighters'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:36 AM
Original message
Obama Warns Of 'Massive Layoffs Of Teachers, Police, And Firefighters'
WASHINGTON (AP) -- If Chuck Lacasse had gotten his pink slip four days earlier, Uncle Sam would have covered most of his family's health insurance while he looked for a new job.

But Congress allowed emergency health care assistance for unemployed workers to expire May 31, and seems unwilling to renew it despite pleas from President Barack Obama.

On Saturday night, the White House released a letter Obama sent to congressional leaders of both parties asking for nearly $50 billion in emergency aid to state and local governments to fend off "massive layoffs of teachers, police and firefighters" and to prevent a possible double-dip recession.

"We are at a critical juncture on our nation's path to economic recovery," the president warned. "It is essential that we continue to explore additional measures to spur job creation and build momentum toward recovery, even as we establish a path to long-term fiscal discipline. At this critical moment, we cannot afford to slide backwards just as our recovery is taking hold."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/13/obama-warns-of-massive-la_n_610401.html

First Bernanke warned Congress not to cut spending and now President Obama utters the possibility of the double dip. I see a decided shift in emphasis coming out of the Fed and the administration (one I applaud, btw). If we can't beat back the deficit hawks right now, we're in for hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. How come rich people never have to practice 'fiscal discipline?'
It's always us peons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. weird, isn't it? must be the same reason they never have to practice personal responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Because they're rich.
Seems like a shit answer, but there it is.

And as long as America keeps on believing this silly lottery-esque dream that someday, they TOO will be rich, that's the way it's always going to be.

Being rich means never having to abide by the law or say you're sorry for it.

Hell, the SEC dicked around with the Bernie Madoff mess for nearly 10 years even after a whistleblower came forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. this is related to the reported possibility that various states & cities are on the verge of
"bankruptcy"?

wonder if the imf will come in with rescue plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think the real economic picture has emerged despite the, somewhat, rosy rhetoric
and the Fed and the WH are staring at the very real possibility of a new downturn. They seem to be trying, belatedly, to move away from the deficit hawks (who are, basically, trying to impose IMF style austerity on us without the middle man). If they don't succeed in turning this back, we're in for a bad ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. Wrt rosy rhetoric, can't help think there is a better frame than double dip
I know that is the commonly agreed acceptable phrase. Seems too academic, too investor class, too amoral, too happenstance. I don't know. Anyway, I know it communicates what is meant well, but not the real cost.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. The emphasis should have been jobs. Instead it was healthcare in 2013.
Now we will all pay for Obama's misguided priorities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. That sounded exactly like
something Liz Cheney or Rush Limbaugh would say. How in the fuck was Obama to create jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. While I agree with you in a way, when Obama coined the phrase "Main Street not wall Street"
What did he mean by that and what did he do toward that goal? Health Care was the ONLY thing toward that goal I can recognize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Apparently "Main Street not wall Street"
was only a slogan. Looks that way now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. No, Cheney and Rush would spout the same RW nonsense that government never created one job.
Stimulus spending directed at investments in infrastructure and startup money for green technology companies would have helped.

I know the Republicans weakened the investment and recovery act by diverting 40% to tax cuts but we did get a larger majority in the Senate after that. Perhaps the jobs bill passed could have been larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. That is right. But,
imagine trying to get a second stimulus passed with infrastructure projects as the only focus. Of course the tax cuts didn't do shit. Obama could create jobs, it just isn't practical in today's political climate. Not when the other side wants the economy to worsen so they can regain power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Practical is in the eye of the beholder
There is value in a populist message and showing yourselves to be on the side of the people even if not successful. It also highlights those working against the people. If he fights for programs such as these and they are defeated, you lay the blame for the crappy jobs' situation at the feet of those who opposed you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. Not to pile on but the fucktards that live in my community
who work at the shipyard and other bases who cry all the time about how government creating jobs is socialist, and government should be out of the business of economic development should do to themselves what they are doing to America and the rest of us and hang their heads in shame.

The Big Deal isn't fit to call itself a shadow of the New Deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
54. The same way FDR did.

The obvious thing to do, but the capitalists don't like that solution, might cut into their profits if people weren't desperate for work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. If they fired just one of the Wall St. CEOs who got us into this
mess, his salary and bonuses would probably pay all those teachers, firemen and cops for a couple of years. We don't need Wall St. Crooks, they do nothing for us except take Corporate Welfare to bail them out when they fail. We DO need Cops, teachers and firemen. Priorities, someone needs to make a list and send it to our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. stop the wars and bring jobs back to America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. A-MEN!!!
I wonder how much of a chunk of our budget these two wars cost every damned day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
62. We're bleeding money
because of these wars. Sometimes I wonder if those at the helm want to drown the United States in debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. Sign the petition: The War is Making You Poor ACT
http://salsa.mydccc.org/o/30019/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=34

I realize there are more effective forms of activism, but we can do this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. where the hell were these deficit hawks when THEY were running it up?
hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Always part of their plan. Run huge deficits so if Democrats regain power, there's no money left
for any programs that might help average people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. It is so nice to watch 'certain rich people' decide how much punishment
the working class is to receive for something they didn't have any part of. :eyes: Pensions? 401k? Rich people don't care, they have a new yacht to buy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. State funded positions fall under the state budget
Edited on Mon Jun-14-10 07:02 AM by stray cat
the stimulus bill helped hold onto some of these jobs last year but isn't available for this year. If you want these position protected it means more state taxes and fewer state benefits. How much are each of us willing to sacrifice to assure those in public funded jobs keep those jobs and get their pay raises?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. True that, but as you mentioned, the US government could help states and localities hold on to them
Another stimulus, one that isn't forty percent tax cuts, would help save these positions. But apparently that isn't going to come through.

So, teachers are going to get fired, as are firefighters and police. Not only will these people suffer due to a lack of jobs, but worse yet we will all suffer as the quality of public services decline.

FDR Obama isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Huh, the article says President Obama is asking Congress for $50 billion in emergency funds
He, apparently, believes it could and should be made available this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
37. Umm, have you lost your mind? Tax cuts were a big part of that "STIMULUS"
Edited on Mon Jun-14-10 11:44 AM by Mithreal
How do tax cuts fund local, state and federal government?

I would love to get into a discussion with your fiscal conservatism and excuses, so please elaborate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
19. War and the fucking military jobs are more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Damn straight, what we do best nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. +++
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. so Obama... when will the rich pay their fair share of taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
39. We are all waiting for the answer to that.
I can predict what he will fight and lead for, but not feeling like exposing my low expectations. The era of low expectations is over.

Real Dems kick ass, not just talk about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. Already happened here
Used to be that these were the solid jobs. You may have not made a lot of money, but they were stable and secure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
23.  K+R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
25. Wow. Sorry to hear about so many people hurting. It's insane.
Edited on Mon Jun-14-10 11:15 AM by freddie mertz
This congress has been a huge disappointment.

Hope the president gets his way on this, before we all end up in the dumpster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Yes, I'm happy to say I support the President 100% on this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. Me too. Just wish it could be more.
Edited on Mon Jun-14-10 01:38 PM by Spheric
It is only designed to stop the bleeding, not to heal the problem.

But, I'll take what we can get.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. I agree, we need more. But the president will be lucky to get half...
Given the "austerity" bullshit the MSM and the chicken-hearted Pols are pushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. I know. Let's buy off the cons and "moderates" with more government defunding
I mean tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Almost ready to climb into that bathtub. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. +1 $50 billion in emergency aid to state and local governments!
Get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
33. This is the society the teabaggers want...
no public schools, cops or firemen, no $$ for roads, trains, planes. No social services. Just survive on your own.

The irony is that many of my friends, especially my southern rescue friends, hate Obama and call him a socialist, while they have no health care, and are living hand to mouth and while the Republican governor cut their mortgage tax rebates. I just don't understand how blind they are! Is it because he is not lily-white?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. For some sure, but not most.
To call the ignorance and propaganda stirring all about racism is to give too much power to racism and not see the real root causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. Maybe. But I'm more inclined to think it's 30 years of supply side propaganda & brainwashing.
I despair, at times, of ever exorcising Reagan from our country. What we see now is the result of 3 decades of his 'pro-bidness,' anti worker, anti poor policies, anti government propaganda People who never lived in a different time have no idea. Others bought into this crap years ago and have not the inclination to educate themselves beyond the old, anti government talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
36. I believe the double dip has already begun.
Edited on Mon Jun-14-10 11:45 AM by Spheric
It would now take a miracle out of congress and the administration to nip it in the bud.

Unfortunately, I believe they will continue to chase the problem rather than work proactively to prevent it. Nothing they have done to date gives me any confidence that the majority even understand what the root problem is. As a body, they continue to do things that reinforce the decline rather than alleviate it.

I also agree with the president on this, but it is too little, too late in my opinion. It's not like nobody could see this coming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. I agree. The encouragement I take from this is limited to being glad they seem to get it now
By 'they' I mean the White House and, apparently, Bernanke. It is likely too late but what can be done is to start making the case and, when it all falls apart, point out the need to now get serious about real stimulus and real job creation.

The worst would have been to continue acting as if the deficit hawks are right and then try to further cut spending after the downturn. A disaster in the making, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. During the double dip, we will start hearing triple dip, wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. We can bounce all the way to the bottom. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
38. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
41. The money we send the federal government is our money and we deserve a say
Not all should go to bail out TBTF banks, Wall Street, more war and military privatization and obsolete and wasteful weapons programs.

Certainly got our money's worth investing in subsidies to the oil, coal and nuclear freeloaders. Regulation would cost money, don'tcha know.

If the President FIGHTS for this, he earns some capital which he desperately needs imo.

All the fiscally conservative types who are against this, go take back your natural party but you're too embarrassed and it's too hard, am I right? Fellow Dems, there isn't any more room in the tent, make some choices about which friends need to go. I am sure the conservatives and moderates who have no problem voting conservative will be there when you need them. You may think liberals have nowhere else to go but you are right and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
46. "which I am now against" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
47. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
49. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
51. well at least wth the teachers, cops, and firefighers being laid off
the kids who should have been in school can make money selling drugs on the streets that the cops used to patrol. When the riots break out they can burn the wealthy areas to the groud due to lack of firefighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
52. Shock Doctrine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. Going global.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
55. Ruh Rho.. I thought everything was green shoots and Rosy?
That's what Bernake said? That's what Geithner said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Everything but the fundamentals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
60. K & R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC