Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Sure. Ya want me to bend over, too?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:54 PM
Original message
"Sure. Ya want me to bend over, too?"
Full body scanners go mainstream at BWI and National. Coming soon everywhere.

How long until some kid sews a pipe bomb in his winkie and we all get three wanks before we of the penile persuasion can board?

Where does this intrusive shit END? How much do we have to give up? Who gets rich from this?

Full Body Scans At Reagan National And BWI Airports


LINTHICUM, Md. (WUSA) -- The imaging technology in operation at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport screens passengers for weapons, explosives and other objects concealed under layers of clothing without physical contact.

Some air travelers don't mind the extra layer of security in place. "I think I would rather go through the scanner, I prefer not to be patted down so I think simpler is always better," said Jeff Petters.

The full body x-ray scanner is part of 450 new machines that are being deployed across the country. The full body scanners have started screening passengers for hard to detect explosives. A heightened threat that has forced some passengers to adjust.

>snip<

Gene Dragotta said , "I have three daughters and a wife, I know all four would have a difficult time with it. The issues are privacy, especially if you are going to the same airport all the time, the same people see you, you know, and some of these pictures have made it on to the internet, just Google it."

>snip<

Air travelers can opt out of the full body scans, but those who do will be subjected to physical pat downs.

>snip<

http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=102314&catid=189


Everyone feelin' safer now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. If kids get the full body scan, isn't that child pornography?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The article quotes an Orthodox Jew who says this is offensively intrusive
Those who don't want a scan can opt for a pat down by a person in a too-tight uniform wearing rubber gloves "for your protection."

Can they fondle kids, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. no
it requires lascivious exhibition or the intent to satisfy one's lust.

Just plain old naked pic isn't per se child porn by itself. It gets you a long way there don't get me wrong, but in this situation, no it isn't child porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. EVERYONE who doesn't agree with this should opt for the pat down and follow up with a letter to TSA
expressing concern over the invasion of privacy. If enough air travelers complain the TSA will be forced to acknowledge that there is an issue.

They rigged the test and got the result they wanted: few complaints. Why do I say they rigged it? Here's an example. The test machine at San Francisco International was placed in the international terminal, where many passengers are foreign nationals willing to go along with anything rather than be detained by the TSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. At least I can wear my 8ga PA and not worry about the metal detector
"Pat this, pallie."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. i know. ridiculous, for illusion of safety. papers in az. no fly list because of attitude.
police get to "guess" if you are speeding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Fake left ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. that is funny.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jp11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. I haven't been patted down at the airports is it the standard perimter of parts or
do they go grabbing at your tender bits?

Anyway this is BS, another illusion to make people think they are safe, on with the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. All sheep are examined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Best suggestion I've heard...
...is to make everyone go through an enclosure that will set off any explosive device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That wouldn't detect knitting needles
Or nipple rings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC