Article below says: ""We're being trained to detect different levels of taint, which in this case is oil," WHAT ABOUT THE NEUROTOXIC DISPERSANT THEY ARE USING? BP HAS ALREADY DUMPED OVER 1,000,000 GALLONS INTO THE GULF!
Gulf Seafood: Trained Experts Use Smell To Test For Contamination
First Posted: 06- 7-10 07:45 AM | Updated: 06- 7-10 09:52 AM
PASCAGOULA, Miss. (AP) -- William Mahan bends over a bowl of raw shrimp and inhales deeply, using his left hand to wave the scent up toward his nose. Deep breath. Exhale. Repeat. He clears his palate with a bowl of freshly cut watermelon before moving on to raw oysters. Deep breath. Exhale. Repeat.
He's one of about 40 inspectors trained recently at a federal fisheries lab in Pascagoula, Miss., to sniff out seafood tainted by oil in the Gulf of Mexico and make sure the product reaching consumers is safe to eat.
But with thousands of fishermen bringing in catch at countless docks across the four-state region, the task of inspectors, both sniffers and others, is daunting. It's certainly not fail-safe.
The first line of defense began with closing a third of federal waters to fishing and hundreds more square-miles of state waters. Now comes the nose.
-snip
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/07/gulf-seafood-t... DISPERSANTS
Surface dispersant used: more than 765,000 gallons
Subsea dispersant used: more than 256,000 gallons
Total dispersant used: more than 1,021,000 gallons
-snip
http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doc/2931/589... /
In Gulf Spill, BP Using Dispersants Banned in U.K.
by Marian Wang, ProPublica - May 18, 2010 3:24 pm EDT
The two types of dispersants BP is spraying in the Gulf of Mexico are banned for use on oil spills in the U.K. As EPA-approved products, BP has been using them in greater quantities than dispersants have ever been used in the history of U.S. oil spills.
BP is using two products from a line of dispersants called Corexit, which EPA data appear to show is more toxic and less effective on South Louisiana crude than other available dispersants, according to Greenwire.
We learned about the U.K. ban from a mention on The New York Times’ website. (The reference was cut from later versions of the article, so we can’t link to the Times, but we found the piece elsewhere.) The Times flagged a letter that Rep. Edward Markey, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, sent to the EPA on Monday. The letter pointed out that both the Corexit products currently being used in the Gulf were removed from a list of approved treatments for oil spills in the U.K. more than a decade ago. (Here’s the letter.)
As we’ve reported, Corexit was also used after the Exxon Valdez disaster and was later linked with human health problems including respiratory, nervous system, liver, kidney and blood disorders. One of the two Corexit products also contains a compound that, in high doses, is associated with headaches, vomiting and reproductive problems.
-snip
http://www.propublica.org/ion/blog/item/In-Gulf-Spill-B...