Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If I can get enough people to believe that the square root of 2 is rational, I'm made.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 01:20 PM
Original message
If I can get enough people to believe that the square root of 2 is rational, I'm made.
Of course, I have to keep mum about that "proof by infinite regression" thing. And train the straight face to declare loudly the rationality of sqrt(2).

I'll have to craft very damning insults for people whose speech risk steering people towards the "irrationality proof". (Heh, I'm getting good at this. I automatically say "irrationality proof" with a disgusted smirk of derision.) Perverts? Anti-Americans? Anarchists? Nihilists? Terrorists? I have to decide carefully, research which is more effective. Perhaps a combination, depending on the situation.

Math teachers are target #1. Hey, it worked for "liberal", why not for "math teacher"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually, PI was originally a rational number: 3
It was really a pretty damn good estimate and worked for basic calculations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Pi is rational, if space is sufficiently warped. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. actually as a math teacher I have wondered how we escaped the
Bible vs reality arguments in regards to pi. The Bible clearly states pi is 3 and we teach it is something else entirely. A certain temple had a stone that was seven cubits in diameter and 21 in circumference. Even 22/7 would give you 22 for the circumference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I still measure things in cubits - and other body part measurements.
It is really quite handy when you are looking for something of a specific length.

No, I don't use THAT body part for measurements in stores! I know someone would ask if I didn't state that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. also How can you say the circumference equals something
Edited on Sun Jun-06-10 03:43 PM by ThomThom
if you multiplied by PI, since we don't know what pi equals or we round off? It must be an approximation, mustn't it? I guess it is close enough if you are drilling oil wells and such and it doesn't matter how much oil leaks out around the plug. Just kiding, do I need a smiley face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wasn't a cubit basically forearm length? So,
you have a person with a long cubit measuring the circumference and a person with a short cubit measuring the diameter - voila! 21/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. If that doesn't work
try obfuscating the value of pi. Just claim pi=3.2 is within experimental error. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. personally, the square root of zero is my favorite number. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why the bigotry against decimals?
"Irrationality" is simply integer-centric bigotry. From now on, we shall call it "divisibility challenged". Every number deserves the right to be considered rational.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Calling a number "Irrational" is now not politically correct, they were created that way. New term
Edited on Sun Jun-06-10 03:43 PM by The Straight Story
Non-Rational-Conforming digits.

So stop being a hate filled evil bigot and get on the bandwagon of happiness and joy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC