Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP stonewalls plan to vacuum up oil & instead tries to bury scope of disaster with dispersants.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:28 PM
Original message
BP stonewalls plan to vacuum up oil & instead tries to bury scope of disaster with dispersants.
Edited on Sat May-29-10 06:34 PM by mhatrw
http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/could-cleanup-fix-for-gulf-oil-spill-lie-in-secret-saudi-disaster/19476863

Even as proposals pour in for cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, one veteran of a massive (and secret) crude spill in the Persian Gulf says he has a tried-and-true solution. Now if only the people who could make it happen would return his calls. "No one's listening," says Nick Pozzi, who was an engineer with Saudi Aramco in the Middle East when he says an accident there in 1993 generated a spill far larger than anything the United States has ever seen.

According to Pozzi, that mishap, kept under wraps for close to two decades and first reported by Esquire, dumped nearly 800 million gallons of oil into the Persian Gulf, which would make it more than 70 times the size of the Exxon Valdez spill. But remarkably, by employing a fleet of empty supertankers to suck crude off the water's surface, Pozzi's team was not only able to clean up the spill, but also salvage 85 percent of the oil, he says. "We took out of the water so it would save the environment off the Arabian Gulf, and then we put it into tanks until we could figure out how to clean it," he told AOL News.

Shortly after the April 22 sinking of the Deepwater Horizon, he and a friend, Houston attorney Jon King (with whom Pozzi recently launched a business called Wow Environmental Solutions), traveled to Houma, La., headquarters for BP's response center, to offer up the lessons he'd learned working in the Persian Gulf. Ever since, he says, the pair's been stonewalled. When he called the manager at BP in charge of the cleanup effort, "He said, 'Don't bother me. Follow procedures,' " Pozzi recalls. "He said, 'I'm taking names and I'm going to sue you.' "

Next, Pozzi and King phoned the president of BP and left a message with his secretary. An hour later, though, they received a call from "from a young lady in BP headquarters" who asked how she might assist them. They told her about their plan -- but have received no further contact. Then, early this week, the duo say they spoke with Capt. Ed Stanton, the Coast Guard commander overseeing a length of the affected coastline. Stanton asked for a written proposal. That's the last Pozzi and King heard from him. "It sounds so simple that they turn around and say, 'That was years ago. We've got modern technology now,' " Pozzi says. "But their modern technology isn't working too well."



*****


Not only is BP ignoring this tried and true approach, but BP's use of almost a million gallons of http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8445264">highly toxic chemical dispersants (so far) at both unprecedented volume and depths makes any kind of surface vacuuming effort impossible, guaranteeing that most of the oil remains below the surface of the ocean where its toxicity will enter the ocean's entire food chain at the lowest levels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why are we letting these murderers continue to kill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They should all be in jail, and all their assets should be seized.
But that would make too much sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Tar and feathering seems more appropriate to me.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. there's a sense that it's "BP's oil" -- so, the question is, do they want other entities to get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. BP is the devil.
:grr:

:mad:

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And we thought Monsanto was Satan.
Edited on Sat May-29-10 07:55 PM by glitch
Actually they all are. Any corporation that hires teams of lawyers and lobbyists to derail environmental regulation = EVIL. Against Humanity.

Edit: And that goes for their idiot cheering puppet supporters too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. What happened to Costner's Ocean Therapy machines?
Are they in use, or just sitting there idle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Not enough of them to make much of a difference. Now, if they could build
Edited on Sun May-30-10 12:08 AM by Jennicut
a few thousand quickly that would help. The machines seem to work but they are too small. Just like using hay...you would need an incredible amount of it. The size of the spill is nearly the the size of my state, CT. http://paulrademacher.com/oilspill/#Connecticut

And some think is bigger:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. This has been out there and NO ONE wants to talk about it. Here's another link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. And by employing a million gallons of dispersant (so far), BP is deep sixing this as an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yep. Covers up the problem and moves us further from the solution they want to avoid due to expense.
And the masses gobble the excuses up like turkey on Thanksgiving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Funny how the "BP is the ONLY ones who have the expertise to fix this" crowd never shows up
to address what Nick Pozzi has been saying. A little tough to discredit a guy who cleaned an almost 800 million gallon spill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yep. Their patterns have been painfully prediable of late
it's still hard to believe that ANYONE still has any faith is BP. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC