Family Research Council: Count On More RAPES If You Let GAYS In Military

[Segami]

:wtf: ..........:puke::puke:.:puke:One has to wonder what kind of mangled & tortured childhood these morons had who continue to spew such garbage. The scary part of reading such positions is that these morons actually believe their own demented tripe. The wheels are squeaking and have gone out of round.



<>



" Here's how the Family Research Council envisions things going if Don't Ask, Don't Tell is repealed: first, more straight soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines will be fellated in their sleep against their will. Then, commanders afraid of being labeled homophobes will refuse to do anything about it. Eventually, the straight service members will quit out of fear.


On a conference call with reporters today, FRC Senior Fellow for Policy Studies Peter Sprigg delivered the results of what he said was the first-ever study of "homosexual assault" in the military. Joined by several former military officers opposed to allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces, he warned Congress that the DADT repeal language currently under discussion with the agreement of the White House will turn the U.S. military into a terrifying free-rape zone where no heterosexual is safe.


"We are today releasing an analysis of publicly available documents which show that homosexuals in the military are three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are relative to their numbers," Sprigg said. "We believe this problem would only increase if the current law against homosexuality...were to be repealed."



more


<http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/family-research-council-end-of-dadt-means-more-gay-rape-in-the-military.php?ref=fpa>

[GreenPartyVoter]

1. We need a God face-palm graphic. And these people are just utter idiots if they

don't acknowledge the number of female service members being raped by their male counterparts. Is that also because of teh gay?

[Mist]

12. Apparently rape is bad only if done to straight guys. nt

[GreenPartyVoter]

18. Apparently so.

[Nikki Stone1]

30. +10,000

.

[BadgerKid]

20. Would you settle for a Jesus facepalm?

[GreenPartyVoter]

21. Perfect! :^D

[KingFlorez]

2. How....descriptive

Sounds like someone's fantasy, getting that done while you are sleeping.

[Bluebear]

3. 'marines will be fellated in their sleep against their will' - what a vivid picture he paints

[JaneQPublic]

6. ...sounds like a job for another rentboy. (nt)

[Bluebear]

7. ...his loins stirred as the young buzz-cutted recruit grew, in both desire and ....

I wish my sex life were half as interesting as the fundies picture it to be.

[Rockholm]

26. Are female servicemembers cunningligus-ed in their sleep?

Sorry. I don't know another term, well, that would be less "graphic"
This is so ridiculous.

[nadinbrzezinski]

4. JEESUS AGE... these faux Christians that would

never evah put a uniform, have no fucking clue!!!!

And yes, those most afraid of them gays (and it was women at one time, and blacks in white units, and so it goes) have never served... or mostly. I am sure a few did enlist or join as Officers...

[napi21]

9. Yea, I can just hear those same words from the SAME GROUP

being said when there was talks of allowing women in the military! It's truely amazzing how they hate any kind of changes & use the same amn words to agrue against it!

[Segami]

10. Control through FEAR.

[nadinbrzezinski]

13. Well they are not the only religion using that

we have more than just one religion, though this one is fun to stomp on (I can't stand fanastics, no matter what day of the week they pray)... but I am starting to conclude that in the Fear and Religion department we also have the Marketplace is king, but we don't read the sacred books crowd.

:-)

And they also use quite a bit of fear.

[Bolo Boffin]

5. They have really put a lot of thought into this. n/t

[RKP5637]

8. Sounds very fantasy prone looking for a sex party than serving in the military.

It is absolutely bizarre; his statement that more straight soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines will be fella ted in their sleep against their will. Then, commanders afraid of being labeled homophones will refuse to do anything about it. Eventually, the straight service members will quit out of fear. This is sheer dribble,

[Robeson]

11. O.K., my brain just exploded...

...some people are twisted beyond belief. They need some serious - secular - counseling.

[Segami]

16. Hysterical Right Wing Reason # 373

<>

[HughMoran]

14. Is it possible to rape an organization?

'cause FRC needs to know what it's talking about :eyes:

[chill_wind]

15. What a scourge on America's fragile sanity these rabid RRR's are.

Unreal.

[jgraz]

17. Why the fuck do we care what this hate group thinks?

Do we ask the Klan their opinion on civil rights?

[TheMadMonk]

19. Quite possibly true. Insecure "heteros" on the openly gay. nt

[Angry Dragon]

22. These people just want to project their own fantasies

on to others.

[Segami]

23. Those ' fantasies ' are shaping the world we live in while perpetrating a continued line of hatred.

[LiberalFighter]

24. What about the other 91.8% heterosexuals assaults?

Sprigg said his "analysis" was military documents tracking sexual assault cases. According to his figures, 8.2% of sexual assaults reported to military authorities in fiscal 2009 were homosexual in nature.

"Yet homosexual activists themselves have admitted that less than 3% of Americans -- 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women -- are homosexual or bi-sexual," Sprigg explained.

And Sprigg based the number of homosexuals on the say so of someone instead of studies? Sprigg should go jerk himself off.

[nickinSTL]

28. less than 3%? where did they dig that statistic up?

I mean, it could be I've seen outdated data, but last I knew, it was around 10% :shrug:

[donco6]

25. OK someone's been watching way too much gay porn.

Seriously. Fellated in their sleep against their will? In the history of penises, has this ever happened?

[Solly Mack]

27. Idiots. Depraved idiots.

[nickinSTL]

29. what utter stupidity

the homosexuals in the military would be covered by the same rules regarding sex and relationships that cover heterosexuals.

And...you know, in other countries, when gays were allowed to serve openly, it was a NON-EVENT.

The only thing that might prevent it from being a non-event in the US military is the preponderance of idiots like this in the country.

[calico1]

31. So as I understand this...

If a gay guy and a straight guy are in a foxhole together facing enemy fire ....the gay guy is not going to be thinking about staying alive and fighting the enemy but rather molesting the other guy in the foxhole with him? Am I supposed to believe this?

Where do these morons get stuff like this?

Plus he is inferring that all homosexuals are perverts.

I think HE is a pervert.

[jp11]

32. Also the straight guy won't be able to do his job because the gay guy in his foxhole will be messing

with his mind and the such by him being there all gay and stuff, total bs.

[JerseygirlCT]

33. I haven't heard them worrying too much about the rapes that actually

ARE happening all the time in the armed services - to our female troops.

That obviously doesn't bother them - but their gay fantasies...

[jp11]

36. No that isn't as important as the liberal Democrats pushing their social ideas on the military.

[Ikonoklast]

34. These people are insane perverts.

I can't understand how they get anyone to listen to their fantasies.

[Robeson]

35. That would appear to be the logical conclusion.