Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1964 all over again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:35 PM
Original message
1964 all over again
http://www.suntimes.com/news/steinberg/2307998,CST-NWS-stein24.article

"The Good Negro," Tracey Scott Wilson's powerful drama about civil rights, begins with what should have been an ordinary event -- a mother takes her 4-year-old to a public toilet in a department store.

But the mother and daughter are blacks living in the South, the era is the early 1960s, and the bathroom is reserved for white customers -- and so unfolds the tragedy burning up the stage at the Goodman until June 6.

When I attended the opening two weeks ago, the story line seemed firmly situated in the past. But as William Faulkner said, "The past isn't history -- it isn't even past." Suddenly there's a current politician -- Tea Party darling and Kentucky Republican senatorial candidate Rand Paul -- obligated to defend his stance on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the landmark legislation that said little girls can't be banned from public toilets and that lunch counters selling grilled cheese sandwiches must sell them to all, regardless of color.

The specifics of Paul's statement are not important. He believes that private businesses should be free to discriminate, if they choose -- not an uncommon position for a Libertarian -- but when he found himself an actual contender, he began the furious backpedaling that most politicians do as they approach the levers of power.

"I unequivocally state that I will not support any efforts to repeal the Civil Rights Act of 1964," he said, adding that he is also against racism.

Big of him. Earlier, he had told Rachel Maddow that while the government may prohibit itself from discrimination, he draws the line at Big Brother telling businesses what to do, adding, "had I been around" when the bill was being debated, "I would have tried to modify that."

I never thought I'd live to see the day when would-be leaders are so captivated by their pet philosophies they would question 50 years of racial progress -- we just passed the half-century anniversary of the Greensboro, N.C., Woolworth lunch-counter sit-in.

This isn't about Rand Paul -- good luck to him. This is about a brand of politics -- call it Libertarianism, call it Tea Baggery, whatever -- that hates government, whatever it does, so much and sides so completely with business owners and their supposed right to decide who can use their toilets, that they'd ignore the greater right of 4-year-olds to use a public bathroom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it's not just about LIbertarians and Teabaggers. Rand is a REPUBLICAN.
They espouse much of the same key rhetoric and ideals: smaller gov't, no taxes and "you're on your own."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wcast Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting Comparison
Remember, it was just last year that the Louisiana JP, who wouldn't marry racially mixed couples, defended himself against the racism charge by using the line: I have friends that are black, they come to my house, and I even let them use my bathroom. (I'm paraphrasing) The kids in my History class had a field day with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC