Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Warren On A Pants-less America

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:27 PM
Original message
Elizabeth Warren On A Pants-less America
I support Elizabeth Warren far more than most in DC or academia in economic matters. SCOTUS would be great.

First link includes video.

=========================================================================================

Jon Stewart once told Elizabeth Warren that he wanted to make out with her. Obviously, when the chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel stopped by The Colbert Report last night, it was a rather different story.

"Explain to a conservative why he should support curtailing the ability of banks to do whatever they want," said Colbert. Warren made the case for a strong consumer agency that would, among other provisions, make credit card and mortgage agreements readable.

"Why do we have to wear a belt with our suspenders? We already have one set of regulators," pressed Colbert.

"Well, actually, right now, we don't have any pants on," she replied.

http://jezebel.com/5530487/elizabeth-warren-on-a-pants+less-america

From Wiki:

Elizabeth Warren (born 1949) is an American attorney and law professor. She is the Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law at Harvard Law School -- where she teaches contract law, bankruptcy, and commercial law -- and has devoted much of the past three decades to studying the economics of middle class families. In the wake of the 2008-9 financial crisis, she became the chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel created to investigate the U.S. banking bailout (formally known as the Troubled Assets Relief Program). In that role, she has provided a critical check on the U.S. Department of the Treasury and has been a leading advocate for accountability and transparency. Since 2007, she has advocated for the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which President Barack Obama has supported and Congress is now considering.<1> On April 12, 2010, CNN reported that Warren's was among additional names being considered as Supreme Court nominees to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens.<2>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Warren
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now tell me again......
Why is this woman NOT our Sec of Treasury instead of Geitner? Or at least Head of the Fed.

Oh, it's because she doesn't wear pants......right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You nailed it!
She runs circles around those dudes while they twiddle their thumbs and pretend to not cater to their old co-workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I would rather see her in a position that draws on her
knowledge and skills as an economist rather than in the robes of a Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. SCOTUS is influence for a longer time and sets precedent
She has a bent towards social justice and a good mix of law and economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. It has nothing to do with her gender
If she was as incompetent and corporate-friendly as Geithner or Bernanke, you can bet she'd hold one of those posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent appearance.
That didn't seem scripted to me.

She's a gem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. She has the rare ability .....
to take the most abstract subject and make it easy to understand. She is a natural born teacher. And smart to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. the funny thing is. .. .
MOST abstract subjects ARE easy to understand -- but those who don't want us to understand them make them SEEM difficult. ;-)



TG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. good point. it's the gory details that are hard to understand.
and usually the answers to questions like "what went wrong" are all in the gory details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. one of the few i trust to tell me the truth..... and in words anyone can understand too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. i want to bear her babies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No...no... me... meeeee! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. :-) Oh god, she is wonderful.
K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I know DU is a serious forum....
and not given to sexual comments... but...

I'm an old guy, and deeply in love with EW. Mind and body.

She starts talkin' "pantless" and my mind is off in my little fantasy world.

Can you imagine pillow talk with that beautiful, brilliant woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Unabashed pro-Warren bump nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. She's on Morning JoeScum right now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Tell us more! :-)
I don't think Joe would want to try to patronize her the way he often with his fluffy sidekick.
How'd she do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. They really love her over there.....
surprise surprise. Meka grows a pair of ca jones when EW is on. Joe tends to shut up and agree. She has such a down to Earth way of consensus building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. She is great! I would trust her in just about any position in the government1
The most influential the better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC