Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP's Chairman defends company's safety record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:07 PM
Original message
BP's Chairman defends company's safety record
It's just a guess, but I will venture that we are being lied to on a grand scale about the real volume of oil spilling from the well. I will also guess that when all is considered in a year's time, this will be the worst environmental accident in the nation's history far greater than anything we have ever experienced before.



VENICE, La. — BP's chairman defended his company's safety record and said Sunday that "a failed piece of equipment" was to blame for a massive oil spill along the Gulf Coast, where President Barack Obama got a firsthand update on the slick creeping toward American shores.

BP PLC chairman Lamar McKay told ABC's "This Week" that he can't say when the well a mile beneath the sea might be plugged. But he said he believes a 74-ton metal and concrete box — which a company spokesman said was 40 feet tall, 24 feet wide and 14 feet deep — could be placed over the well on the ocean floor in six to eight days.

McKay said BP officials are still working to activate a "blowout preventer" mechanism meant to seal off the geyser of oil.

"And as you can imagine, this is like doing open-heart surgery at 5,000 feet, with — in the dark, with robot-controlled submarines," McKay said.

more at:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/top/all/6986345.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. inconceivable!
BP did not build the containment devices before the spill because it "seemed inconceivable" the blowout preventer would fail, Rinehart said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How can it be inconceivable if they didn't even INSTALL one?
Fucking morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The BOP, apparently had to be operated manually.
BP says the BOP failed to activate and is claiming equipment failure. But BOPs are supposed to be checked on a very regular basis.

There's also a real question about whether the people charged with triggering the Blowout Protector actually threw the switch after the explosion happened, due to their haste to evacuate the rig after the explosion occurred.

Then there was no back up and the BOP didn't work automatically, as I understand things. There was no acoustic regulator in place (a $500,000 piece of equipment) that would have permitted remote activation of the BOP.

There's also the question about what caused the blowout to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. BOPs are pressure tested before going in any hole.
It would be very odd if they did not follow this very basic procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's my understanding too. Was talking to a geologist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm not the only oilfield trash on DU, that makes my heart feel good.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah, you aren't alone.
And intriguingly, you're both saying the same thing about the functionality of the BOPs. Nicetameetcha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. This is reading like a Michael Crichton book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. it doesn't matter. this one major fuck-up erases everything else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's just like Dubya!
Other than 9-11, I kept y'all safe...*smirk*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Real volume now reported @ 210,000 gal. per day
according to National Park Service Report, here:
http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2010/05/crews-gulf-islands-national-seashore-continue-take-precautions-against-oil5800

first it was 1,000, then, 2000, then 5,000...now.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. And McKay is lying thru his teeth about that safety record.
I posted about it earlier and do not want to repeat all of the post
BUT
I will point out that as of MARCH of this year, OSHA was STILL fining BP for behaviors
that BP stubbornly refused to fix in prior months.

full post here:

BP HAS HORRENDOUS SAFETY RECORD
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8258249

Yeah, I am mad.
I registered at our state's online newspaper sites and entered the above post information
in the comments sections too.

:mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You're right. Everything I've ready about their record was that it
SUCKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC