Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear Arizona, Let's take a refresher course on that "innocent until proven guilty" thingie.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 05:16 PM
Original message
Dear Arizona, Let's take a refresher course on that "innocent until proven guilty" thingie.
Back in the day, when I was coming up, me and my friends all learned that the Man can't just arrest me and ask me to prove I didn't commit a crime. Sure, if there's some actual evidence -- lemme spell that for ya: a.c.t.u.a.l.e.v.i.d.e.n.c.e. -- that I knocked off the Mom-and-Pop down the street or peddled heroin on the playground or spied for North Korea, ya gonna have some investigatory options. But even if the Man has some reason to suspect me, he can't just demand I prove I'm innocent. Have I got a right to walk down the street without having to prove to Barney Fife every two blocks that I'm not committing a crime? Here's a little newsflash for ya, Arizona: oh, yeah, man, really, I do, by ancient right, being freeborn, ya know. Maybe ya might like to take that down as a little memo. Otherwise, I gotta say with all due respect, up yours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't the Nuremberg Laws require Jews to show their papers?
Edited on Sun Apr-25-10 05:27 PM by brentspeak
This Arizona legislation isn't too far removed from that requirement. Frightening. And I say that as someone who wants some sort of crack-down on illegal immigration -- just not this kind of crack-down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Looks like they didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Then the law requiring Jews to carry ID cards came shortly thereafter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Or not
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 01:45 AM by Confusious
After Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the Nazis issued every person a permanent identity card. A "J" on the cover indicated that the person was Jewish. Each Jewish man's name was prefaced with "Israel" and each woman's name with "Sarah." Permanent yellow armbands were issued at a later time.

Card courtesy of the Neufeld Family Archive, a collection of Holocaust and family artifacts donated by Anne Neufeld Levin. The collection is housed at Special Collections in UCSC's McHenry Library.

http://www.ucsc.edu/oncampus/currents/97-98/04-13/holocaust.card.htm

In August 1938, German authorities decreed that by January 1, 1939, Jewish men and women bearing first names of "non-Jewish" origin had to add "Israel" and "Sara," respectively, to their given names. All Jews were obliged to carry identity cards that indicated their Jewish heritage, and, in the autumn of 1938, all Jewish passports were stamped with an identifying letter "J".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Jewish_legislation_in_prewar_Nazi_Germany
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. The 1935 Citizenship Law limited citizenship to those "of German or kindred blood"
and added "citizenship is acquired by the granting of Reich citizenship papers." Prompt supplementary regulations/decrees clarified "A Jew cannot be a citizen of the Reich." Special identification papers were required later. An entire detailed accurate account may be tedious and difficult to provide, because the Nazis in a rather sadistic manner began to vary the documentation requirements frequently and rather arbitrarily in order to confuse and disorient targeted populations: it eventually has the flavor of "No, last week we were accepting the yellow paper with the green stamp, but today we have been instructed to accept only the blue pass with the red stamp. If you have the yellow paper with the green stamp and a passport, you can get the blue pass with the red stamp by going to Office X, but if you have the yellow paper with the green stamp and no passport, you must go to Office Y where you will be issued a purple ticket that you can take to Office Z where they will give you a permit to take to Office X with your yellow paper with the green stamp to get the blue pass with the red stamp. If you don't have the yellow paper with the green stamp, you should go to Office Y next week to find out what to do"

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/nurmlaw3.html
http://www1.yadvashem.org/about_HOLocaust/documents/part1/doc34.html
http://frank.mtsu.edu/~baustin/nurmlaw2.html

http://www.pbs.org.nyud.net:8090/wgbh/nova/holocaust/images/timeintro_krakow.jpg
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/holocaust/timeprint.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Jewish_legislation_in_prewar_Nazi_Germany
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. DICK Cheney made us believe it was ok to torture non-citizens...
I blame it all on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He didn't "make" anyone believe that..the ones who do
would believe it even if Cheney didn't say so..they are a bunch of sick unmentionables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Obama has done even better than Cheney. He has convinced
even some 'progressives' that's it's okay for a U.S. president to order the assassination of a U.S. citizen.

Every day we move closer and closer to having no use for any kind of silly, quaint documents known as the Constitution, the Bill of Rights etc. Kings never needed them, why should we? Just show your papers and stfu, that's the way it USED to be when Kings ruled the world, and before a bunch of dreamers got the crazy idea that people had rights! Rights? As our former ruler, The Decider and unitary executive once said 'If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator.

I have a feeling that while he was stupid enough to say it out loud, a whole lot of our so-called leaders are not too devoted to the idea of a democracy. Just look at what they are doing to it, or not doing to try to save it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. John Walker Lindh was a citizen and he was tortured
and he's rotting in jail for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

We're 'way far down that road. Remember, they showed us a video of him drugged and in pain? And no one questioned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now that's one righteous rant!
:kick: and REC'D!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think I'm gotta practice saying "writ of habeas corpus"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. McCain, Hannity, Beckkk reply: what do you have to worry about
if you are doing nothing wrong? Oh yeah, they are WHITE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh that little protection of our civil rights went out the window when
Gitmo was instituted. And yes, American citizens were incarcerated in Gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. ... Let me give you a word of the philosophy of reform. The whole history of the progress of human
liberty shows that all concessions yet made to her august claims have been born of earnest struggle. The conflict has been exciting, agitating, all-absorbing, and for the time being, putting all other tumults to silence. It must do this or it does nothing. If there is no struggle there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing up the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress ...
<“West India Emancipation”, Frederick Douglass, Canandaigua NY, August 1857>
http://www.blackpast.org/?q=1857-frederick-douglass-if-there-no-struggle-there-no-progress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. You'd think our civilization would have evolved since 1857.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well, that's a nice optimistic thought. I like it. Optimism is good.
I try to maintain just a bit more than I need to counterbalance my healthy paranoia

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. I was just reading that today.
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. I believe it's been amended to "innocent until proven brown."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC