Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK to require men who have unprotected sex to post million-dollar bond first

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:39 AM
Original message
OK to require men who have unprotected sex to post million-dollar bond first
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 07:40 AM by elehhhhna
so the resulting child if there is one can be supported properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Taking prostitution to New Heights ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the women who have unprotected sex with them?
Rather sexist to assume that only men should or can have financial responsibility eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. In some of our more backward states, like Arkansas, only men do have the financial responsibility
for a child. A mother's income, or lack thereof, is not taken into consideration in setting child support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because most women don't know that unprotected sex causes pregnancies?
Ever heard the expression it takes two to tango. Why is the woman absolved of any responsibility?

No glove no love was how they used to say it. Maybe the ladies should rehearse that line before heading out for the night. Or buy their own condoms. Hell of a lot cheaper than a kid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. The risk is on the women.
They are the ones that will be stuck caring for the kid on their own. They are the ones who will lose wages and career opportunities because of the time it requires. They will be stuck paying legal fees while trying to get child support.

It takes two to tango, but this has nothing to do with who's fault it is and everything to do with making sure that kid is supported.

Before my sister was divorced, her husband said he needed some time and moved out leaving my sister alone to care for their daughter. Too bad my sister did not have the option to say she needs her space and abandon the family. Maybe the woman should post a bond in case she dies in childbirth or gets run over by a bus or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Why did she not have the option?
Women abandon families too. Just because he took the option and she didn't does not mean she never had it. It means she had different, and more socially acceptable, priorities.

And women are not the only ones who become single parents. That they do so more often than men is largely due to the massive, and massively sexist, bias of judges in custody cases - in favor of the female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Because if she did, her daughter would have been alone.
That's a bit irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. She had the same option he did - leave first
You can't blame her greater responsibility on gender bias. She had every bit as much ability to do the same thing he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Actually, neither of them had that option.
Father did it because he could. The reality of the situation with my sister acting as primary care-giver meant that he had more liberty in the matter than she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. niece 21 with 3 mo and 2 yr old. a couple year marriage
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 08:47 AM by seabeyond
they decide marriage is too hard so they decide a break up. he walks.... i mean wtf. babies that young, you NEED two parents. it is a horribly hard time as it is. then calls me to babysit (raise) babies while she works. i dont think so.

as far as i am concerned, they can suck it up for a couple years if need be and get thru this time. still plenty of life to live.

sometimes we have to go beyond what we as adults "want" for the need of the child. go figure

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. So wait a minute - he did it but did not have the option? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Right? How the flying hell can somebody DO something but not have the option to do it?
I mean your post is spelled correctly and uses sound grammar so I assume your English skills are sufficient to understand what it means to have an option to do something, so where is the disconnect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Ah, you didn't ask how it was possible, only if it was true.
Do you have an option to run a red light? No. Can you do it? Yes. "Option" implies that it is somehow allowed. Abandoning one's family is not. Yet it is still physically possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. That's the definition of "option". You're searching for "power" vs. "right"
A driver with gas in the tank and a key in the ingition has the power to run a red light ("the option"). What he doesn't have is the the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. No - option means able to be chosen. I have the option to kill and steal. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's what my Mom did. She needed her space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. i know women who are lousy mothers. i know men who are lousy fathers.
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 08:43 AM by seabeyond
and i am sorry you had a mother that did not do her job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Nobody is stuck caring for a kid.
They choose to continue with the pregnancy and to keep the child.

There are options.

And I'm not talking about broken marriages with kids...I'm talking about flings and the like...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. So you think the woman has a duty to abort and mitigate damages?
wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. I never said duty.
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 09:02 AM by blueamy66
I don't think I did.

I said that the woman has a CHOICE.

Not every little baby is a gift from god, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. With whom are these hypothetical men having sex?
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 08:20 AM by MineralMan
I always thought that sex was a mutual consent deal. That's how I've always treated it, anyhow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Birth control is the woman's responsibility
just as much as the man's.

Make her post a million-dollar bond first as well to make sure she's a good Mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Why not just post enough to fund half the cost of an abortion?
That's the least he could be out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hell I'm in the clear then
I can save my money :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. Do I get an exemption
for having had a vasectomy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC