Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would it be too much to ask that there be an Atheist for the SC?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:27 AM
Original message
Would it be too much to ask that there be an Atheist for the SC?
Edited on Sat Apr-10-10 11:15 AM by Tuesday Afternoon
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now THAT would be awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. that would be two awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. totally
thanks ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. It shouldn't be
I'd love it--and the hellstorm that it would kick off. The Right would go apeshit over an atheist judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. it would be great but too many people would swoon in horror

we are not civilized enough yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. that's the best
way to describe the situation here--we're not civilized enough. You nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't care.
I just want a solid liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not in our lifetimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, that would be too much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. In any western country other than the US, it wouldn't be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Since the law of the land is the Ten Commandments
that would be inappropriate.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. Which is less likely - an atheist SC justice, or an atheist President?
Edited on Sat Apr-10-10 11:00 AM by DavidDvorkin
It's hard to say, but they're both extremely unlikely. Extreeeeeemely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sadly, yes.
It's my dream, but I'm sure I'll be long dead before that happens in this "Christian nation". I would love to see an atheist President, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. Would it be too much to ask that there be
a real Liberal nominated to the SC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Do you have a candidate to recommend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. or someone INTELLIGENT enough NOT to mix their religious views in with law
I have no problems with people having personal religious views - I *do* have problems with people who use those views to decide cases on the bench.

At one time in this country people could step away from one to do the other. We've gone backwards, it would seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Exactly. Regardless of the issue, I'd like to see them rule form law--because justice
is pretty much always going to be on the liberal side of the political fence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. exactly. I don't care what someone's beliefs are. I just want them to not interject them ro
into this very important position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. When hell freezes over.
Edited on Sat Apr-10-10 11:31 AM by progressoid
err...ummm...never mind.

k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherish44 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. No way would an atheist be approved for the SC in this day and age
Could you imagine the pants shitting that would go on if one was even "considered"? I personally don't care about the religious beliefs of any potential nominee as long as they are intelligent and can seperate themselves from their religion when it comes to interpreting the law. And yes I think only liberals are capable of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. Yes.. nominees for high govt positions my fake religiosity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. There probably already are. It's just that declaring your non-belief
can be a bar to appointment and acceptance. Odds are that more than one of these well-educated and intelligent people is a non-believer.

In my many conversations with clergy, I discovered that many of them are actually secret non-believers, too. The first one who confided that to me was a shock. The shock grew much fainter as time went by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm sure the Senate would vote for him/her unanimously...
Dream on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. but then how would we legislate religious morality?????
oh - the HORROR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why would it matter?
Despite some of the claims about the headcount by religion, how many of the justices are active and practicing their purported faiths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC