Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Obama done enough to expand alternative energy to make off-shore drilling look temporary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:24 PM
Original message
Poll question: Has Obama done enough to expand alternative energy to make off-shore drilling look temporary?
He said in announcing the off shore drilling that it was part of more energy independence and a move AWAY from carbon based energy.

Has he done enough to move us to alternative energy source to make that claim that off-shore drilling is part of moving to alternatives credible?

If you think he has done enough, say what he has done that should impress us.

If you think he hasn't done enough, say what he should do to impress on the public the seriousness of the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for larger sample. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. No.
If you think he hasn't done enough, say what he should do to impress on the public the seriousness of the effort.

Announce high-speed rail from SF to NY. At the cost of a few months in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Congress is balky
especially the conservative Senate. Anything new seems to scare the hell out of those old boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Exactly the right question to ask, IMO. Good poll.
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 01:38 PM by Zenlitened
My own feeling is that this drilling announcement would be easier to accept if we'd already had a good, solid green energy/jobs plan getting under way.

Something really transformative and do-able, addressing the employment crisis, the need for energy independence and environmental concerns simultaneously.

The sort of thing we were hoping Van Jones would help get rolling. I wish he'd stayed on.


(edit "stayed")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good question. We will have to see how this bill shapes up. (CALL YOUR CONGRESSPEOPLE)
No passive waiting allow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. P.S. Will be interesting to see how the upcoming GM Electric car does
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 01:50 PM by emulatorloo
Will their be incentives to buy the CHevrolet VOLT?

ON EDIT LINK To Volt gallery:

http://www.chevrolet.com/pages/open/default/future/volt.do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Screw subsidies and credits to private industry. Start a public green energy initiative
Let the people own these windmills already, so they don't have to continually pay profit to a company built on the government's back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbiker Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. darned good question coming
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 02:24 PM by zbiker
from someone who lives in an energy producing state (wyoming). i have watched the boom and bust cycles here repeat themselves time and time again, and i have always had to wonder why washington does not do more. heck, even getting out of the way and let us provide the resources that abound here without all the interference would be a big help.after all, wyoming has tons of federal land that could be put toward the problem, most of it has trouble growing so much as a sage brush, let alone anything else. and the majority of it is floating on top of natural gas,oil, and coal.
i wish in his announcement that he was going ahead with the drilling program instead of only promising to promote the search for oil. would have been a giant leap forward. looking for it is a start, but developing it does so much more.
we are reputed to be a great candidate for wind power unlike any other, unfortunately the environmentalist challenge our ability to do all we can here, heck our legislature has even addressed how we will be taxing the power generated for commercial generation, just like we do with our mineral production. all we need now is the abilities to get underway without a lawsuit at every turn :(

as someone once said
"lead,follow or get out of the way"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. that's why gov't is unlikely to move us to alternative energy
wind and solar are low tech, can be done on a small scale as well as large, and the ''fuel'' is free.

Contrast that to the high tech, by necessity centralized nuclear plants and the endless supply of fuel required to use gas and coal. All three are tailor-made for both monopolies and giving an endless income stream to the oligarchy, and as we saw here in California ten years ago, an ideal means to blackmail the public out of billions when the right pols are in power (or powerless).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Does clean coal count?
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 02:59 PM by progressoid
:evilgrin::hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. wasn't there suppose to be an Apollo project of alt energy?
so far that's not really materialized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. It's been more like an Alpo project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Certainly not. I almost went with Other: LOLZ
The biggest investment in green energy in history is but a drop in the bucket. At this stage its a fig leaf more than a real effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC