Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Women’s Group Rips RNC Over Bondage-Themed Nightclub

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:26 PM
Original message
Conservative Women’s Group Rips RNC Over Bondage-Themed Nightclub
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/democratic-national-committee/conservative-womens-group-rips-rnc-over-bondage-themed-nightclub/

The news that nearly $2000 in RNC funds were spent on a bondage-themed nightclub seems on the verge of creating yet another major headache for RNC chair Michael Steele.

The latest: A conservative women’s advocacy organization — one whose members donate to the RNC — is demanding answers. Penny Nance, the CEO of Concerned Women for America, which boasts half a million members nationwide, emails:

“Did they really agree to reimburse nearly $2,000 for a bondage-themed night club? We have several questions. For the RNC: Why would a staffer believe that this is acceptable, and has this kind of thing been approved in the past? And for the Democratic National Committee: Do you believe that it is appropriate to use tax dollars for pornographic exhibits like the ones recently funded by the stimulus bill?

“Please explain to Republican and Democratic women if and why you think it is appropriate to promote pornographic enterprises? As women we find the very idea of officials from either party approving of endeavors that objectify and demean women outrageous. This kind of behavior is not appropriate for national leaders that our children should be able to look up to as role models, and that our daughters could be working for.

“Did you really swill drinks, ogle young girls and plan party business at this kind of establishment? Please explain!”

Yikes! That last line should really make GOP donors happy. The central question right now seems to be: How did this expenditure of RNC funds get approved?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are all turning on each other...
and I couldn't be happier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF is she doing dragging the DEMs in this??? ITS THE RNC..its your own GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because there is no line between art and porn to them...
every nipple is sacred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. LOL...Love the Nipple Ref :o)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Don't they always do that?
When ever a repug gets in trouble, it's always about the system and Democrats are part of the problem. But when it a Democrat in trouble it's his/her lack of morale standards.

Your leaders are sleaze balls, deal with it:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Bullies are KNOWN to do this...."They do it TOO"...its dilution of guilt by pointing
LOL

The GOP ARE Sleaze Balls...maybe Sleaze Boogers Too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. "pornographic exhibits"??
What's that all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait. Which "pornographic exhibit" was funded by the stimulus bill?
Anyway, it's unfortunate that this sort of pearl-clutching isn't limited only to Christian Right whack-a-doos.

There are plenty of self-appointed censors of public morality on the so-called "left" who are more than happy to align themselves with the CWA when it comes to stuff like pictures of consenting adults fucking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I have no idea. Maybe they're still in a snit over Mapplethorpe's "Piss Christ"??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. "Piss Christ" wasn't by Maplethorpe, it was by Andres Serrano.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ

Roughly speaking, Mapplethorpe did the homoerotic stuff. You know,
what the Republican men use when they're *NOT* at the Lesbian/Bondage-
themed strip club.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Mapplethorpe didn't do "Piss Christ"?????????
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 07:10 PM by kestrel91316
I feel like I did when I found out 2 or 3 years ago that Peter Frampton did NOT die back in 1980 of a drug overdose like I would have sworn on a stack of bibles that he did.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Sorry, no. But I know how you feel; that (feeling of being certain but being wrong anyway)...
...is an all-too-common human experience. It happened to me just the
other day with a bit of pop music that I would have bet money was by
Todd Rundgren, but wasn't.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. All you have to do is google on it
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread486950/pg1

The National Endowment for the Arts may be spending some of the money it received from the Recovery and Reinvestment Act to fund nude simulated-sex dances, Saturday night "pervert" revues and the airing of pornographic horror films at art houses in San Francisco.

The NEA was given $80 million of the government's $787 billion economic stimulus bill to spread around to needy artists nationwide, and most of the money is being spent to help preserve jobs in museums, orchestras, theaters and dance troupes that have been hit hard by the recession.

But some of the NEA's grants are spicing up more than the economy. A few of their more risque choices have some taxpayer advocates hot under the collar, including a $50,000 infusion for the Frameline film house, which recently screened Thundercrack, "the world's only underground kinky art porno horror film, complete with four men, three women and a gorilla."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. "four men, three women and a gorilla"
I'm not sure if I like those odds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. One of the women is Sarah Palin, and she's got a gun!
Or maybe she plays the Gorilla.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Man, I thought they were going to underbid the competition...
Ann Coulter alone has dominatrix written all over her.

Hmmmm... couldn't find an image of that that wasn't NSFW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. wheeeeee heee heee !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good, I love it when our opponents fight among themselves.
Popcorn! :popcorn:

Drinks are on me ... :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Actually, Concerned Women should do this. Sexism is a problem across the board.
Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. "What?! Well, I never!"
"It can't be true, but it's even on the 'news! I'm shocked. Shocked! What could be worse than this? I'm still in disbelief about dear leader Rush Limbaugh getting hooked on satan's pills," said crazy GOP lady.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. They obviously don't realize what went on in the BACK rooms
Objectifying and demeaning is sometimes a two-way street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. "Shut up, take your shoes off, and get back in the kitchen." - Republicons
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 07:31 PM by SpiralHawk
"That's quite enuf out of you uppity, free-thinking entities of the female persuasion." - Republicons (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC