Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Health bill may exempt top Hill staffers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:31 PM
Original message
Health bill may exempt top Hill staffers
The health care reform bill signed into law by President Barack Obama Tuesday requires members of Congress and their office staffs to buy insurance through the state-run exchanges it creates – but it may exempt staffers who work for congressional committees or for party leaders in the House and Senate.

Staffers and members on both sides of the aisle call it an “inequity” and an “outrage” – a loophole that exempts the staffers most involved in writing and passing the bill from one of its key requirements.

The bill requires “congressional staff” to buy insurance from the exchanges – with a stipend from the Office of Personnel Management But page 158 of the bill defines “congressional staff” narrowly, as “employees employed by the official office of a member of Congress, whether in the district office or in Washington.”

The Congressional Research Service believes a court could rule that the legislation "would exclude professional committee staff, joint committee staff, some shared staff, as well as potentially those staff employed by leadership offices.”



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34900.html#ixzz0jFYVCmVj

ok sue me, it's politico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought someone on here said this wasn't true and had a link
to the verbage. I'm trying to find out to refute my a$$hat duo of my SIL/BIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That link would be lovely. It's why I posted this
I have a friend who posted it on facebook. I'd love to see it refuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No this true
the oft repeated lie that Congress itself is exempt is not true, but it seems due to a mistake that it doesn't apply to some staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Based on what I have seen on staff assignments it would cause severe headaches to manage it.
It would be less of a hassle if they offer the same insurance as congressional staff.


After reading the legislation pertaining to this issue I would have to disagree with the so called Congressional Research Service. I know they should be experts but even experts screw up.
REQUIREMENT.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the effective date of this subtitle,
the only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are—
(I) created under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act); or
(II) offered through an Exchange established under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act).

(ii) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(I) MEMBER OF CONGRESS.—The term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ means any member of the House of Representatives or the Senate.
(II) CONGRESSIONAL STAFF.—The term ‘‘congressional staff’’ means all full-time and part-time employees employed by the official office of a Member of Congress, whether in Washington, DC or outside of Washington, DC.

The language requires congressional staff to be enrolled but doesn't require the other group. But it also, doesn't prohibit that group from being enrolled. The question that needs to be clearly answered is the definition of a qualified individual eligible to participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. no no no no no
stop echo-chambering the right wing talking points.

the myth has been soundly debunked here: http://mediamatters.org/research/201003250022
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's what i was looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. What else are they supposed to buy?
Are they giving extra options to a limited group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC