Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Controversial USA Delivered "Voter Fraud" Indictments Right on Time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 12:11 PM
Original message
Controversial USA Delivered "Voter Fraud" Indictments Right on Time
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003107.php

Controversial USA Delivered "Voter Fraud" Indictments Right on Time
By Paul Kiel - May 1, 2007, 12:15 PM

The Justice Department has a longstanding policy regarding the prosecution of election law or voter fraud cases: the closer to the election it gets, the more cautious prosecutors should be about bringing indictments. The reason is simple. Bringing an indictment close to the election can intimidate minority voters, affect voter turnout and potentially even influence the result of the election.

But Bradley Schlozman -- the former U.S. Attorney for Kansas City and controversial deputy head at the Civil Rights Division -- broke with the policy. Not only that, but there's evidence that he rushed four indictments to land just before last November's election.

Indeed, timing aside, even Schlozman's decision to pursue the cases at all is questionable in light of established Justice Department practice. Although trumpeted as cases of voter fraud, the cases alleged only registration fraud, and there's no evidence that those registrations were intended to result in actual fraudulent votes. For that reason, other U.S. attorneys have passed on pursuing similar prosecutions. But Schlozman, who'd worked to push voter I.D. laws while in the Civil Rights Division, leapt at the opportunity.

The more you learn about Schlozman's decision to indict four voter registration recruiters for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) five days before last year's election -- Missouri's Jim Talent was battling Claire McCaskill in one of the closest Senate races in the country --, the worse it looks.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Say, did Ann Coulter ever get indicted for voter fraud?
Would that have to come from a US Attorney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Real voter fraud is going unindicted
Remember Ann Coulter and the fraud performed by registering in one district and voting in another - even after Coulter was informed of the information.....That was during the 2004 election and the matter has not gone to court yet....how come...that is blatant voter fraud...Let's all send letters to the governor or Florida and ask, now that Bush is no longer governor will they start to do their duty and not let republicans off scott free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't understand how US Atty Gregory White's (Northern Ohio) postponement on Noe/Coingate
doesn't get more attention. I guess there is so much interference, but since Ohio was pivotal to the theft, you think that this story would get some legs.

On Schlozman, and others who falsely aided in the suppression of voters, I say throw the book at them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC