Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Petraeus supports DADT repeal!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:29 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Petraeus supports DADT repeal!
BREAKING: Petraeus supports DADT repeal!
by indiemcemopants
Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 11:18:12 AM PDT

Gen. David Petraeus on Tuesday told a Senate armed services committee that he believes "the time has come" to consider an abolishment of "don't ask, don't tell," but supported an exhaustive review of the policy's effects on recruitment and unit cohesion before either a moratorium or legislative repeal is considered.

This is good. I don't think he was expected to give an opinion either way on the repeal of DADT. He's not exactly a liberal - he's seen as a likely candidate for the GOP nomination in 2012.

This could do a lot to move things forward, especially with Barney Frank asking the White House to come out in full support of repeal.

"I believe the time has come to consider a change to Don't Ask, Don't Tell. But I think it should be done in a thoughtful and deliberative matter that should include the conduct of the review that Secretary Gates has directed that would consider the views in the force on the change of policy. It would include an assessment of the likely effects on recruiting, retention, morale and cohesion and would include an identification of what policies might be needed in the event of a change and recommend those polices as well."

The repeal could be done before the study is finished, obviously.

The best chance for repeal is to add the bill into the Defense Authorization bill. That's seen as the most likely way it will pass because it would require 60 votes for its failure. And Republicans won't vote against a national security bill no matter how much they might whine.

We need to call our reps and senators, as well as the president and make them do them do this.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/3/16/846809/-BREAKING:-Petraeus-supports-DADT-repeal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great news
The freepers are going to have a stroke - they wanted him to run for President. May have to lurk some later today to watch the tearing and rending of garments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. They'll call him Betrayus n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Wouldn't that be a hoot? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why not? Increasing numbers of "cannon fodder" to be sucked into the intake of the War Machine.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why do they need another study? They don't. This is just responsibility shifting.
They could always ring up the IDF and ask them how things are going if they don't want to use the RAND studies ALREADY in their possession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not going to jump for joy just yet
"But I think it should be done in a thoughtful and deliberative matter that should include the conduct of the review that Secretary Gates has directed that would consider the views in the force on the change of policy. It would include an assessment of the likely effects on recruiting, retention, morale and cohesion and would include an identification of what policies might be needed in the event of a change and recommend those polices as well.""

Frankly THAT is the weasel on this. That is the "at least a year" long review that's been ordered. Just in time for the 2012 campaign to start. Those in the GBLT community know full well what THAT means. That once again we will be told to shut up and vote and that things will be changed AFTER the election, otherwise it would be OUR fault if Obama lost.

Sorry, been down this road. I am glad the General has decided to embrace equality but I am saving the champagne for the actual repeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That is sad
What you say is EXACTLY RIGHT, it's just sad that it's right.


Especially this part: "That once again we will be told to shut up and vote and that things will be changed AFTER the election, otherwise it would be OUR fault if Obama lost."


Very very sad. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. yup
:hug: So tired of the games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good for him, but enough with the "studies": just repeal the silly, unjust thing RIGHT NOW. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The studies are a stall tactic
Soon it will be too close to the election and will have to be put off again until "after the election".

Wash, rinse, repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. There is no excuse for stalling on DADT. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good news
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. This should be checkmate for the policy. Added bonus: Freepers are deleting topics about it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Congratulations to all gay people for this!!! Real progress folks...
Thank you President Obama :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC