Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama losing chance to reshape judiciary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:32 AM
Original message
Obama losing chance to reshape judiciary

President Obama's appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court is one high-profile success. UC Berkeley professor Goodwin Liu has been nominated to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, but he is expected to meet significant GOP resistance. (Dilip Vishwanat, Getty Images; Mandel Ngan, AFP/Getty Images; Laura Morton, For The Times)


An early chance for the Obama administration to reshape the nation's judiciary -- and counter gains made in the federal courts by conservatives -- appears close to slipping away, due to a combination of White House inattention and Republican opposition.

During President Obama's first year, judicial nominations trickled out of the White House at a far slower pace than in President George W. Bush's first year. Bush announced 11 nominees for federal appeals courts in the fourth month of his tenure. Obama didn't nominate his 11th appeals court judge until November, his 10th month in office.

Moreover, Obama nominees are being confirmed at a much slower rate than those of his predecessor, largely because of the gridlocked Senate.

Key slots stand without nominees, including two on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the body that reviews decisions by federal agencies and a court that is considered second in importance only to the Supreme Court. Federal judicial vacancies nationwide have mushroomed to well over 100, with two dozen more expected before the end of the year. To date, the Obama administration has nominees for just 52 of those slots, and only 17 have been confirmed.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-obama-judges15-2010mar15,0,118526.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Surprise, surprise.
Another Obama bashing thread. Yeah, Congress gridlock definitely = complete and utter Obama failure.

Lookie there, a Kucinich thread...gotta run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have been fairly vigilant in posting items both positive and negative of his work on this issue
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 08:37 AM by usregimechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Case in point from a recent post:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. This topic (judicial appointments) is so important because
these appointments, be they SCOTUS, Court of Appeals, etc. are for LIFE...Long after President Obama is out of office, the people he appoints will still be on the court....It (judicial appointments) is one of the most lasting legacies a president has..

I just wish President Obama would use the nuclear option to pick up the pace of these nominations....He's nominating individuals, yet they often take 6 months+ to confirm...The GOP has no intentions of working with him on anything, so "F" them...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Barack_Obama

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yes you have.
I pay attention to your posts, they are consistently fair. Thank you and ignore knee-jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Free Don Siegelman!
Until Obama gets rid of the federal prosecutor who went after Siegelman he has zero credibility on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is disgusting
This was my main reason for voting for Obama. But, where Reagan and Bush II nominated nothing but hardcore rightwingers, Obama has countered that with a very slow stream of moderates. Liu is one of the few I can get excited about.

What a terrible waste of a generational opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't believe for one second...
... Obama ever intended to "reshape" the judiciary. As on almost every other issue and policy, he has proven to nothing more than Republican Lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I am still hoping that this will not be the case but he has got to turn this around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's where I was at..
.. for quite a while, thinking that this guy was playing some sort Zen Magic Multi-dimensional Chess Game at a level I just wasn't understanding. He was and is, problem is however, I failed to recognize that even early on, he was playing for the other side, not We the People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, if you are right and he pulls that with the next SCOTUS pick, he can knock on his own doors...
next election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well..
... for a sizable percentage of us that carried his water last time, that decision is already made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. What could change your mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Several 180 degree reversals ...
... for a start. I'll come back later and define some of them, if you wish. Gotta go for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Senate deserves some of this criticism as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Whinging about this just takes the cake
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC