Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lehman's advisers were guard dogs that didn't bark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:52 PM
Original message
Lehman's advisers were guard dogs that didn't bark

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/mar/14/lehman-brothers-linklaters-ernst-young

Lehman's advisers were guard dogs that didn't bark
By their silence, the failed bank's lawyers and accountants gave highly questionable practices a sheen of respectability

Heather Stewart
The Observer, Sunday 14 March 2010
Article history


It's good to know we still lead the world in something. "Business services" is often cited as one of Britain's proudest export industries, and last week's postmortem on the collapse of Lehman Brothers from the US "examiner" brought some formidable examples of its recent triumphs.

"Magic circle" City law firm Linklaters gave the thumbs-up to "Repo 105", the complex manoeuvre that allowed the ailing Lehman to book short-term loans from other banks as "sales", effectively disguising billions of dollars of assets, sometimes conveniently just as the end of a quarter approached. Herbert McDade, the man known inside the bank as its "balance sheet tsar", described the instruments in an email as "another drug we're on".

-snip-

Auditor Ernst and Young is even more firmly in the examiner's sights. He says it was "professionally negligent" in passing the Repo 105 arrangements, which will be music to the ears of the many creditors and shareholders itching to take class-action cases against anyone they might be able to blame for the firm's catastrophic bankruptcy.

The examiner also reports that senior Lehman banker Matthew Lee sounded the alarm about "accounting improprieties" in the summer of 2008, referring specifically to $50bn of repo arrangements, but Ernst and Young "took virtually no action to investigate".

Of course, Linklaters and Ernst and Young will say they were only following the rules, but auditors and lawyers are professionals and they gave Lehman's highly questionable practices a sheen of respectability.

-snip-

more...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lehman's cooked the books just like all the other investment companies.
The only difference is that Lehman did not have anyone to bail them out. The book SELLOUT gives a detail account of most of the Wall Street companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wow! Wonder how G&S woulda' fared were it left to fend for itself without the funding from
WB and bailout by the Feds. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes the professional class
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 08:04 PM by AllentownJake
Is very busy selling schemes and other bullshit called consulting. Was in the business for a year, my clients would have been smarter to try to develop their own talents for their needs.

It is rather silly to think that an outsider understands what you do better than you do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick for the Sunday afternoon crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC