Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

YES!!!!! SUCK IT, STUPAK!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:31 PM
Original message
YES!!!!! SUCK IT, STUPAK!!!
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/11/845299/-Dems-will-Move-Ahead-on-HCR-without-Stupak

In the best news all day category, House leadership has washed their hands of Stupak. There really wasn't any way around it, since he refused to budge. But it also suggests that leadership doesn't think the 12 supporters Stupak has claimed are firm in their support of him.


Granted, the Senate Bill's language isn't great, but Stupak's attempt to back-door-ban abortion has failed!!!

B-) :evilgrin: :hippie: :party: :toast: :bounce: :silly: :beer: :fistbump: :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. If this is true, then Nancy deserves a lot of credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rec!
That's a glimmer of good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good For Speaker Pelosi, Sir
This wretch needs to be kicked back into his kennel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. That doesn't mean I'm not still going to contribute to his primary challenger
We need a true Democrat in his seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Unfortunately, his district is very conservative
It is pretty solidly Republican in national elections, and is probably only being held by Stupak because he's so conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yeah, but he'll have to work a little hard
and we will make sure he knows that the reason he has to work hard is because he isn't espousing good Democratic ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Damn Straight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Excellent point! I've already given Connie Saltonstall ten bucks!
Stupak needs to be punished!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. +1
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yep, it's nice to see him kicked to the curb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bart Stupak = Religious Cult Member
- K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. K and R
Yes, that's worth :party: :toast: :thumbsup: :woohoo: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. Delete.
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:46 AM by Brickbat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Stupak doesn't say.
And there's no guarantee that Stupak really has 12 - he's blustering, but judging by the news, I'd say that Pelosi called his bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I found a list on an anti-choice site claiming the 12, and it's the usual Ds who oppose abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Would like to see the list,
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 01:15 PM by ooglymoogly
but I'm guessing there are 12 who would like to vote with Stupid. Maddow narrowed it to 4 who might actually vote with Stupid if they would not lose their constituency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Stupid is just what he sounds like; Stupid Bluster. nt
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 01:21 PM by ooglymoogly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Maddow narrows it to 4 possibly 5 who would support Stupid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
h9socialist Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Stupid . . . I mean Stupak should not be seen a representative of his Congressional district . . .
Rather, he should seen as Representative of the Upper Michigan Archdiocese. It is with a great degree of embarrassment that I admit to having campaigned for him in 2008. Actually, I have family in Stupak's district. I wanted to help Obama in a swing state. When I went out to campaign for Obama the locals gave me some Stupak fliers to hand out as well. I wish I had just burned the damned things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC