The same people that get very upset over virtually any impediment to the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th Amendments, as well as habeus corpus and abortion, all of a sudden turn around regarding the 2nd.
I've noticed personally that they tend to start sounding like Gonzo when he was explaining away habeus corpus and such. "Oh, we're not taking away your rights... you didn't have them in the first place, you see!"
Keep an eye on the "Guns" forum. If he does, it will be discussed (heavily) there.
Keep in mind that a Toledo newspaper editor thinks it would be a jim-dandy idea to do... well, I'll let him explain it:
<snip>
Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw them each hunting season upon presentation of a valid hunting license. The weapons would be required to be redeposited at the end of the season on pain of arrest. When hunters submit a request for their weapons, federal, state, and local checks would be made to establish that they had not been convicted of a violent crime since the last time they withdrew their weapons. In the process, arsenal staff would take at least a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that he was not obviously unhinged.
<snip>
The disarmament process would begin after the initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of police would be formed and trained to carry out the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no advance warning, city blocks and stretches of suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and searches carried out in every business, dwelling, and empty building. All firearms would be seized. The owners of weapons found in the searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year in prison for each firearm.
<more>
http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070425/OPINION04/704250310/0/OPINIONSounds an awful like the ghetto sweeps the Nazis would do in Warsaw, if you ask me.