Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Temple Grandin: Savant or Professional Killer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 07:53 AM
Original message
Temple Grandin: Savant or Professional Killer?
This Saturday night HBO will be airing a made-for-television biopic about Temple Grandin, who is acclaimed for her work in autism and designing humane handling facilities for cattle.

Beloved by many, Grandin, who is autistic herself, was one of the first people to talk openly to the public about her condition lifting the stigma that is often associated with autism. In addition to being one of the first women to hit the scene in the cattle industry, where she wasnt welcomed with warmth, shes also widely known for her lectures and books, including Animals Make Us Human: Creating the Best Life for Animals.

Grandin, who now has a Ph.D, and is an Associate Professor of Animal Behavior at Colorado State University, credits autism for her success. She claims that the hypersensitivity and unique vision are what have made her so tuned in to what animals sense and how to use it in agricultural engineering to create humane slaughter facilities.

While shes certainly overcome some tremendous obstacles, shes also roused some critics along the way who dont quite see her as a heroine for animals. Indeed, something is amiss.

more . . . http://www.care2.com/causes/animal-welfare/blog/temple-...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nenagh Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank You
Well worth seeing especially if the HBO movie is like the documentary about her that I saw here in Canada.

Being an autistic adult, she spoke about her perceptions and how they are different from us 'normal' folk :)

What I don't know is if all autistic children or people would have the same more spatial perception as she describes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. no. people with autism are very different in their expessions of the same
Edited on Sat Feb-06-10 08:34 AM by RainDog
my son has aspergers and after I read Grandin's books I asked him if his experiences were the same. some were, some weren't.

my son, however, has very limited spatial abilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do you believe it is morally justifiable to kill animals for food?
If you do, believe that it is morally justifiable to kill animals for food, then Grandin's efforts to make food animals lives and deaths as humane as possible is a good thing.

If you believe that killing an animal for food is the moral equivalent of killing a human for food then she is, indeed, a mass killer.

I do believe that she does care for animals and her efforts to make food production more humane should be applauded.

My main concern is that while I believe that her techniques, if implemented correctly, would make the slaughter of animals more humane, when the ideal that an animal should go to its end without knowing what hit it, comes up against slaughterhouse production line deadlines, poorly trained workers and your basic corporate greed, these humane techniques are going down the kill chute with the cattle and end up in the waste pit.

Without vigilant regulation with real teeth in them, this is not going to happen. Unfortunately, the last place that anyone who actually cared about animals would want to work (myself included, I have to be honest) is a slaughterhouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. She spoke about this on her interview on Fresh Air
The new movement is to implement objective standards which can measure the animals' distress and have people there to monitor this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I don't think morality enters into it.
But I certainly do not believe that killing animals for food is immoral and it is certainly not equivalent to killing a person.

I do think our system of confined animal feed lots is wrong in a lot of ways but that does not mean I want to end the practice of eating animals altogether. Most sensible people, if they knew what happened there, would be in favor of reform at least. Certainly it is at least environmentally irresponsible, leading to massive pollution of air and water ways. The overuse of antibiotics to make animals grow faster or prevent the disease that naturally occurs when animals are crowded together is actually a human health hazard in that it breed resistant bacteria. And I am sure (as Michael Pollan says in the Omnivore's Dilemma) that animals grown the old-fashioned way actually taste better and are probably better for us. The problem then is one of making better food available to more people. The advent of places like Polyface Farms is all well and good for people who can afford it but it is priced out of reach for a lot of people. So I have no idea how to bridge that gap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rip into the autistic lady who's trying to make sure animalls off to the slaugher don't suffer?
That is A-1 fucking classy.

Alicia, if you're reading this, you really need to rethink your choice of subjects based on your goals. If you really don't want people killing cows to eat, going after the one person who has done the most to ensure those animals don't suffer is about as effective as writing a hit piece about Jay Chapman (the originator of modern "lethal injection") because you do not believe in the death penalty.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 30th 2014, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC