Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The contingency plan for losing a Senator was to panic.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:27 PM
Original message
The contingency plan for losing a Senator was to panic.
That's my take-away from this week.

Apparently our genius leadership had no plan in place if, say, Byrd were to take ill and become completely incapacitated. Or heaven forbid, to have something around in case, you know, that safe seat in MA were to fall.

What kind of responsible leadership doesn't have a backup plan?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. One that's out of touch with those who aren't big donors, suffering from the beltway mentality
that plagues so many in D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. it sure seems like it, doesn't it
well . . . I guess you could call bringing back the old campaign-gang a contingency plan. Not a particularly confidence-inspiring one, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another good reason for term limits.. Senators & house reps
need to focus on the "people's issues", and not on their vote-blocs..they need to learn to present good legislation that will stand on its own merit. A more "fluid" senate *& house would go a long way toward curing what ails us all now..

We have a "crony-system" that pretty much guarantees that little will ever get done ...that is.. things that help the broad-base of the populace..

"I'll support your shitty bill, if you support MY shitty bill" is not my idea of good governance.

and with realistic term limits we would not have the utter panic when an fully-ensconced elder dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. And who leads with their main weapon making an emergency, last minute campaign visit?. . .
Why wait until the last moment to send the President in for a desperate, last pitch gamble, when they could have sent a team of campaign advisors in months ago and forestalled the need for last minute fear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. chess. that's just what they want you to think.
I am dying to see how the pretend-to-not-have-the-first-clue plan unfolds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. This is part of an elaborate judo-chess match set up in 2004 to sucker the R's into complacency!!11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's the master plan
They planned not to have a clue... Obama is the master strategerist, just you wait and see!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Something tells me that deep inside someone like Rahm *doesn't care*!
If losing a seat like MA keeps the corporatist power structure over both parties (and people like him) in power still. Think outside the party divide. I'm guessing others who have more allegiance to the corporatist power structure and their own behinds have the same mindset too.

That's the problem when the cancer of corporatism has infected our government so deeply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. What's with the Rahm thing? Did Obama fall into a well or something?
Last I checked Rahm works for Barrack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well, see-- Obama is a chess-playing, master politcian.
Except he's completely manipulated by his hired underlings.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. my lingering anger has to do with the fact the party infrastructure didn't even bother to scapegoat
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 04:04 PM by KittyWampus
some poor bastard and can them.

Couldn't they at least pretend to care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Wonderful point.
"It sucks, but it's nobody's fault, so let's not get angry about it."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. They don't give a shit about losing Dorgan to health care "reform" either n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. I suspect this bill is going to move forward regardless, because all that
"60 vote" garbage was just a DLC excuse for pushing corporate legislation. I'm sure they'll take this opportunity to make the bill even worse for the average citizen, and call it "compromise", but I think the thing will proceed. If it's stopped, it'll be the House that does it. I hope they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. one that's not a responsible leadership. reminds me of WTO
prior to the WTO coming to seattle, mayor paul "i am not a wuss" schell believed there simply couldn't be riots HERE in oh so sophisticated seattle, despite the fact that there had been riots previously when the conference happened in europe.

so, when the wild rumpusing DID happen here, he of course OVERreacted, passed unconstitutional no free speech zones, cops had to fly out of state to get pepper spray, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC