Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Would Teddy Want? Martha Coakley to lose?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:17 PM
Original message
What Would Teddy Want? Martha Coakley to lose?
Would Teddy have knocked on doors for her? Phonebanked? Or, would he pouted and folded his arms and refused to lift a finger for her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Teddy Kennedy would have put PRINCIPLE above PARTY and would have been for SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah. Because he was such a wide-eyed idealist and refused to make any compromises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually, I think Teddy would have voted for the bill as it stands
Yes, he really wanted single-payer. But he was always willing to compromise to get at least part of what he wanted. Don't forget, he also supported HCR in Mass (aka Romneycare), even though it was similar to what's being proposed in Congress. And he supported NCLB. I think there are some folks here who are forgetting that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. deleted
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 09:33 PM by Pryderi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. If Teddy were still with us, this bill would have never reached this level of absoulute suckage.
And for anyone to advocate for this piece of shit in his name, is a cruel sick joke that mocks his memory and his life's work.

If Harry Reid had a fucking spine, he'd trash this shit bill, substitute Teddy's 2007 Medicare for All bill, and serve notice that anybody who voted against it might as well be taking a huge shit on Teddy's memory.

Because that's exactly what they have done by calling this pathetic bill "health care reform".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I don't think so. Kennedy recognized the wisdom of half a loaf being better than none...even a
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 07:31 AM by Pryderi
quarter loaf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Ted Kennedy led the initial work on the HELP bill that never was SP
Look at what he did on SCHIP. The original bill that Kerry and he wrote in 1996 was a national plan and it was an entitlement. In 1997, with something like 55 Republicans in the Senate, this would never fly. He took the basic ideas and much of the language and made big concessions to get Hatch to co-sponsor it. It changed to allow each state to design their own plan and many states (TX) really underused it. It also was not an entitlement and had to be renewed every 5 years.

Yet that bill was the biggest expansion in federal support of healthcare since the 1960s and a bill Kennedy was very proud of. I agree that Kennedy would put country over party, which I would hope most or all our leaders would, but here it is the choice of aiming for the best achievable plan versus something that even if it should be the obvious choice is a quixotic quest given political realities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Teddy would be aghast at the thought of his seat going to the GOP.
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 09:19 PM by TexasObserver
He'd be getting out the vote for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Rove, Limbaugh, and Beck would love to have Kennedy's hide as a trophy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Teddy would have been aghast at this bill.
He would have made a better bill happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. IT'S NO GOING TO HAPPEN IF COAKLEY LOSES! THE BILL HASN'T PASSED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I wish that I lived in your world. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Erroneous post, please ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learning Nomad Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. A couple of people have access to this account. SRY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Unrec for use of the word pout.
Insulting people is a good way to convince them of things, I find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I call 'em like I sees 'em.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:33 AM by Pryderi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. No, he would have posted flamebait on DU attacking anyone who disagreed with him
Oh wait... that was you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC