Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rudy: New 9.11 if democrat is elected (he of course would have memo at the bottom of pile)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:14 AM
Original message
Rudy: New 9.11 if democrat is elected (he of course would have memo at the bottom of pile)
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 07:21 AM by The Count
:

Rudy Giuliani said if a Democrat is elected president in 2008, America will be at risk for another terrorist attack on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001.

Rudy:

“If any Republican is elected president —- and I think obviously I would be the best at this —- we will remain on offense and will anticipate what will do and try to stop them before they do it."
http://www.theonlinescribble.com/my_weblog/2007/04/rudys_threats.html

Considering Rudy thinks W acted responsibly, I'd take my chances, thank you very much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. 9/11 9/11 9/11
Rudy's got nuttin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And that's his albatros to boot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. So what's the difference
between a memo at the bottom of the pile and a briefing on top? A: Of course a Democratic memo at the bottom is more important than a GOP briefing on top that is not acted on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. 9/11 happened on the Republicans' watch n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. I predict that Rudy will be locked in a white room with padded walls before the election....
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 07:33 AM by marmar
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. That sounds much more . . .
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 10:17 AM by Richard D
. . . like a threat than a prediction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, but Rudy thinks it's proper police procedure to...
1) drag a prisoner into a restroom, break off the handle of a plunger, then ram said plunger handle up the prisoners rectum then shove it down his mouth;

2) open fire on an innocent, unarmed "suspicious person" who has failed to telepathically read the minds of the plainclothes officers, and thus hurriedly attempts to get his keys out and enter his apartment building when a pack of mooks pile out of a car and charge in his direction;

3) to continually pester a fellow who has repeatedly NOT sold drugs to undercover policemen, and in fact takes offense at the implication that he's a drug dealer. And then shoot him when he gets into a scuffle with a (still undercover and unidentified) officer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. And also that there's more important stuff to tend to than "OBL determined to
strike in the US". He practically promised he'll goof like W!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rudy that didn't work in 06 it very likely won't in 2008. Say what your for than against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. He is trying to extort a Republican victory
THUG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wish any of the D's would challenge that statement
9/11 occurred on junior's watch . . .

3,000k American military have lost their lives on junior's watch

tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of Iraqi civilian deaths on junior's watch

tens of thousands were homeless after Katrina on junior's watch - how many still are nearly 2 years later

go after the bastard, D's!!! Don't let him spew that crap!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. Go, Rudy, Go!!!!!!
I SOOOOO hope he becomes the Repuke standard-bearer in '08 and keeps this shit up.

Why?

From Keith's most excellent rant last night:

"Which party held the presidency on Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party held the mayoralty of New York on that date, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party assured New Yorkers that the air was safe and the remains of the dead recovered and not being used to fill potholes, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party wanted what the terrorists wanted — the postponement of elections — and to whose personal advantage would that have redounded, Mr. Giuliani?

Which mayor of New York was elected eight months after the first attack on the World Trade Center, yet did not emphasize counter-terror in the same city for the next eight years, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party had proposed to turn over the Department of Homeland Security to Bernard Kerik, Mr. Giuliani?

Who wanted to ignore and hide Kerik’s organized crime allegations, Mr. Giuliani?

Who personally argued to the White House that Kerik need not be vetted, Mr. Giuliani?"


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18316770/


If he is the nominee for the GOP, I will gladly contribute to whatever group, candidate, 527, etc., just to see that set of facts made into a campaign ad. IMHO, it would be the equivalent of the "Daisy Ad" of '64.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC