Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AlterNet: Murderous Xe Services* (Blackwater) Thugs Get Off ... Aren't They "Enemy Combatants"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 10:38 AM
Original message
AlterNet: Murderous Xe Services* (Blackwater) Thugs Get Off ... Aren't They "Enemy Combatants"?
Murderous Xe Services* (Blackwater) Thugs Get Off ... Aren't They "Enemy Combatants"?

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 11:33 AM on January 1, 2010.

Perhaps they should be categorized as "enemy combatants."




The big problem trying international terrorists in civilian courts is that they might get off.

WaPo:

A federal judge dismissed charges against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards accused of killing 14 Iraqi civilians in a controversial shooting in a busy Baghdad square two years ago in a ruling that sharply criticized the tactics of Justice Department prosecutors handling the case.

The judge, Ricardo M. Urbina of the District's federal court, found that prosecutors and agents had improperly used statements that the guards provided to the State Department in the hours and days after the shooting. The statements had been given with the understanding that they would not be used against the guards in court, the judge found, and federal prosecutors improperly used them to help guide their investigation. Urbina said other Justice Department lawyers had warned the prosecutors to tread carefully around the incriminating statements.


(Also, see Jeremy Scahill's piece on the front.)

So, the protections built into our justice system appear to have let a group of rogue mercenaries who opened fire without provocation on Iraqis in a busy urban thorough-fare off the hook. Interesting reality, given that the entire occupation of Iraq was an illegal act.

I'm not familiar with the judge's ruling beyond what the newspapers say. I have no reason to assume the decision was not grounded in sound legal reasoning.

But consider the optics of the ruling from an outsider's perspective:

On Friday, the Iraqi government said it may pursue its own legal case against Blackwater because it believes the employees committed a "serious crime" against its people, government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh told Reuters.

"What happened yesterday confirms that the trial was biased," said Ali Adeeb, a lawmaker and top advisor to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. "This was an unreasonable, criminal operation, and there should have been justice in a trial.


Having watched the U.S. government declare individuals "enemy combatants," to be locked up with at best minimal due process, why wouldn't people assume that the feds can convict anyone of anything when they commit themselves to getting a guilty verdict.

Actually, according to the logic that's prevailed in some quarters since the 9/11 attacks, the accused mercenaries should be hooded, perhaps waterboarded -- you know, for "information" -- and then whisked away to Gitmo. After all, everyone knows they did it, so there's no real need for a trial and evidence and all that jazz. It happened in a war zone -- and we all know that people who do things in a war zone shouldn't be tried in civilian courts. They're terrorists -- massacred civilians.

But most of all, if we're in a war with Islamofascism, the thugs of Xe Services have arguably done more to provide aid and comfort to our enemies than any group in the history of the republic. If they're not "enemy combatants," then who is?

After all, regardless of how we view ourselves or our adventures abroad, to the rest of the world, SUVs packed with heavily-armed and almost wholly unaccountable goons shooting wildly into crowds will always be the face of our War on Terror.

* The WaPo story notes that the incident, "so badly stigmatized Blackwater that the company renamed itself Xe Services." So again I call on readers to start using the new name whenever possible -- Xe Services shouldn't be able to shirk its reputation as a group of brutal and unrestrained bruisers-for-hire by losing the name "Blackwater."


http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/144900/murderous_xe_services*_%28blackwater%29_thugs_get_off_..._aren%27t_they_%22enemy_combatants%22/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. "enemy combatant" is a meaningless phrase created by the neocons to try and justify
holding people without reason. It's a phrase that should die a quick and gruesome death.

The thugs at 'Xe' are murderers, and should be treated as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good points
Edited on Sat Jan-02-10 11:03 AM by Canuckistanian
1) They're not members of an armed force.
2) They wear no uniforms.
3) They don't adhere to any internal or external codes of conduct.
4) They declare themselves exempt from any law, either from their home country or the country where they operate.

and

5) They engage in violent acts against innocent civilians.

That sure sounds like an 'enemy combatant' to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. But they did so to MAKE MONEY.
So its A.OK with the politicians running the US Government.
Increasing Corporate Profits is GOD in this country.
The Working Class must be sacrificed to keep this GOD happy.
It IS "The Uniquely American Solution".

Black is White.
War is Peace.
I did not run on a Public Option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC