Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Husband choked back tears, strict probation, wife did not speak....a friggin' MEN.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:15 PM
Original message
Husband choked back tears, strict probation, wife did not speak....a friggin' MEN.
Fuck 'em BOTH. Go to jail, do not collect, STFU. You created it. Bask in it, losers.



FORT COLLINS, Colo. - The parents who carried out the balloon boy hoax were sentenced to jail Wednesday and given strict probation conditions that forbid them from earning any money from the spectacle for four years.

Richard Heene was sentenced to 90 days in jail, including 60 days of work release that will let him pursue his job as a construction contractor while serving his time. His wife, Mayumi, was sentenced to 20 days in jail.

Richard Heene choked back tears as he said he was sorry, especially to the rescue workers who chased down false reports that his 6-year-old son had floated away in a balloon on Oct. 15. It was a stunt designed to generate attention for a reality TV show.

“I do want to reiterate that I’m very, very sorry. And I want to apologize to all the rescue workers out there and the people that got involved in the community. That’s it,” said Richard Heene, whose wife did not speak at the hearing.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34574260/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. That kid will be sent to another family, now, won't he?
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. no they are spared that cruelty -- there will always be a parent with the child, as there should be
no thanks to the hatefilled mentality expressed by a shocking number of so-called progressives on this site

i am honestly shocked to see so many DUers are practicing sadists

may what they wish for others come to them, i'm sure many of them have smoked a certain harmless weed, and since they believe in jail for victimless crimes let it come to them and swiftly so that they may learn compassion and mercy

it's xmas

i don't need to read all this hate in people's heart aga. people who did a HOAX -- fuck, hoax was once a performance art, a gift, an entertainment

i hope one day the person the judge loves most is put in a jail for a non violent crime that could have easily been handled another way, if i was king of the world, it would be so already



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It really would have been a gift/artistic/entertaining if any
of the rescuers had been injured or killed in their efforts! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. A hoax that cost an estimated $43,000
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121829161

In a state that, like many others, is cutting back on education funding and social services. It may be a tiny part of the budget, but I suspect many agencies would be happy to get an extra $43,000 - oh wait, they won't because these idiots wanted to be on reality TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Their children are the victims.
These two are terrible parents and are raising monsters. It would do the children good to be away from them for awhile. People could have been killed because of the stunt they pulled and that's why people are mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. It's not about "hate". It's about wanting to stop people from endangering a child
And yes, in this instance the kid was safe, but, if they hadn't been caught, who knows what ELSE these people might have done to increase the "marketability" of their lives? Maybe next time they actually WOULD send the boy up in a balloon.

I think we might also want to consider pressuring the FCC to ban "reality" programming or at least restrict the elements of it that actually put people in danger. At some point, people will be killed in the name of boosting the ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Yeah, these parents are the ones advocating hate.
They're teaching their sons to disrespect women and gays by teaching them that to be anything less than macho and violent is to be "pussified." Check out their home videos and you'll know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. I'm sure the people whose wheat crop was destroyed appreciate the entertainment
I for one do not appreciate your spite and malice toward those of us who applaud justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Bullshit; this was not a "victimless crime."
I am all for the Christmas spirit, but this crime cost a lot of people a lot of time, trouble, money and worry. It was NOT "victimless."

Hoaxes are not "performance art," "gift" or "entertainment" when they create problems and misery for others who don't deserve it. There's a big difference between "merry prankstering" and what these people did. A flash mob is maybe performance art or entertainment (although not necessarily a "gift"). This isn't.

Only egomaniacal, immature countercultural twits think that every possible kind of hoax a person can pull is just a cute and funny way to "put one over on The Man."

Oh, and for the record, I have never smoked a certain "harmless" weed, either. I don't care if other people do, but that argument won't work with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. There should be a special catagory of crime
that allows for the use of the stockades for public humiliation in cases of supreme ass-clownery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. it's not nice to fool ....the media lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. They are not being punished because they "fooled the media."
They are being punished for the time, trouble and expense they caused aside from the media frenzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Four years? They should be prohibited from earning any money for it for LIFE.
Otherwise, this just becomes another story they can sell..."Our terrible ordeal in jail...read all about it...and watch our new reality show about life ten years later..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. I agree completely...
...but let's hope that after four years, the 15 minutes of fame will be in its 16th minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. I hope so too. The only good thing about jerks like this is that there's such an endless supply
that usually no one set of jerks can capitalize too highly on its own jerkiness before the next set comes along to replace them with even newer jerkiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Next time, send this pair up in their leaky tinfoil-UFO-hoaxcraft.
Enjoy your moment in the sun, you idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. So we are a country of laws after all?
Lock those pranksters up and throw away the key. I feel a whole lot safer. Wasn't it great to get the little kid to rat on his parents, unwittingly of course, on reality tv> And the citizens cheered 'Thanks kid, now we got them'! I'm sure that child is happy to know he helped the mob put his parents in jail.

Priorites, the media got punked and the mob wanted blood. Too bad for the child! We care so much about children in this country. Well, we SAY we do.

So now that we're back to being a nation of laws, when will we start putting away war criminals and torturers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. Oh, won't someone PLEASE think of the CHILDREN??????
:rofl: Someone had to say it. So now we can't punish the pranksters because all it's doing is exacting media revenge for being punked and punishing their poor dear children. :sarcasm: Cry me a river.

Oh, but yeah, I do want to put away war criminals and torturers. But I think we can still do that too. Too bad it's so much harder. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. No, we apparently cannot do both, unless you know something
I don't know. Last I heard we were moving on because those war crimes are in the past. Our top lawyer doesn't seem interested in prosecuting anyone who made torture a policy in this country, so explain to me why the little people should be treated any differently?

Sorry if I don't see much point in jailing a couple of stupid pranksters who managed to fool our brilliant media into spending hours of air-time on something that many people questioned from the start.

And since you mentioned the children, one in four of them is currently on food stamps in this great country of ours. I consider that a crime and would probably cheer to see those who collapsed our economy held responsible in some way. But we won't see that either, since many of them have been promoted to the highest positions in our government.

I just can't get all excited about locking up a couple of parents who did something extremely foolish. But you go ahead and celebrate and keep dreaming about the law being applied equally sometime in your lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. And a ton of DUers came down on me for calling bullshit on the story.
As it was happening real time. And calling bullshit on the media hype. People called me every fucking name in the book. All I'm gonna say is... "I told ya so."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. me too
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. i had repug, skepitical, holier than thou in laws visiting during this event.
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 08:32 PM by seabeyond
i was able to give them right off the bat, rumor that hoax, per my board. once again, du fettered it out before anyone else had it and made me look really in the know. so all you skeptics, a thank you....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. And they have to pay back $42,000 in rescue costs.
$8000 of that is for the damage to the farm field that was damaged when the ballon landed according to an article I read earlier.

Good for the judge for blocking any profit from this for 4 years.

People shouldn't be allowed to profit from stunts like this. I am hoping the White House party crashers are not able to profit from their stunt either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. ... and they better not EVER get a reality show out of it ...
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck both of them. Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, I saw him choking back his tears....
wondered if he put as much effort into that act as he did when he tried to convince everyone his kid was really missing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. he looked like he was faking..pathetic acting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. The punishment seems appropriate and will send a message to others who seek fame and money
and allow that pursuit to triumph over common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. They should get the Dumbass Of The Decade award.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Nope they were one-upped by the let's crash the White House Party couple...
who will hopefully get the Federal version of this same sentence:

12 months in Danville.

bwa ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Here's to the rule of law
now, if only we could make that stick to much bigger crimes (and wealthier criminals).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Agreed.
There's no reason why we have to set these people free in order to punish those who do much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Their children should be taken away from them
and they (Mr. and Mrs A-Hole) should be set adrift in a balloon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
35. And now the media will stop focusing on the attention whores, starting maybe with Sarah Palin?
Don't hold your breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC