Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Complaining About Lieberman's Actions Yesterday & Not Supporting Sanders Today= Reactionary Screamer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:09 AM
Original message
Complaining About Lieberman's Actions Yesterday & Not Supporting Sanders Today= Reactionary Screamer
Edited on Tue Dec-15-09 10:18 AM by KittyWampus
And by "supporting Sanders today" I mean drumming up as much support and energy for it on DU as is happening against Lieberman, Democrats and Obama.

I don't use the term "reactionary screamer' as an insult but as a very accurate description of those who are constantly up in arms on DU voicing dissatisfaction with what disappointing crap happened yesterday but spend little to no time posting about what positive actions are going on today.

Yesterday- Lieberman was a jackass and the Democrats were spineless
Today- Bernie Sanders has an Amendment that is essentially Single Payer

Now, which of the above two facts has multiple threads going with untold passion being poured out on DU?

You'd think DU'ers who are pissed off about Lieberman and the jellyfish Dems would at least go whole-hog on agitating FOR Sanders' Amendment.

And for those who would respond "writing all the Senators to support Sanders Amendment is useless" I say WHAT FREAKING GOOD DOES POSTING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED YESTERDAY DO?

Maybe this is the real difference between politics in America and Europe. Leftists in Europe don't waste their time posting on message boards about what happened yesterday but fight for what they want today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sanders Amendment has no chance of passing
Edited on Tue Dec-15-09 10:14 AM by walldude
but I agree that it should be talked about more.

Can't fault people for still being pissed about Holy Joe. They feel powerless and angry and they have every right to be. This idiot has taken it upon himself to judge the fate of millions of people whom he has no connection with, no contact with and who didn't vote for him. This will go on for days. People need to vent. If it keeps them from taking it out on someone else then this is a constructive release..

Plus.. better him then Tiger :rofl: At least this is relevant to our lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "It has no chance of passing"- and complaining about Joe has a chance of accomplishing anything?
There are different ways to vent.

It's too bad that energy couldn't be channeled into support FOR something positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's good, but also why not find out why they don't want to use reconciliation? If they use
reconciliation we don't have to worry about lieberman.

Even taking your point, if they don't accept the public option, or Medicare buy in, they will never except Sander's amendment without reconciliation, and no one is talking about that in the Senate, so that tells me the leaderships real intent

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Reconcilliation is only law until the next 5 year budget. Most provisions of the bill
wouldn't even go into effect before they would have to be re-passed.

Also, only the parts of the bill that effect the budget would be eligible to be passed temporarily under reconciliation.

That's why the bush tax cuts were temporary, because they were passed under reconciliation.


And the rest of the bill would still have to be passed in the usual manner.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. You should be a motivational speaker.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think the general consensus is that Sanders' Amendment
has zero chance of passing. That's probably the reason there isn't much discussion about it. It's a great idea, but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sanders has put up a single payer amendment before.
I screamed about it then and to no avail. I have made an effort almost everytime some notion of reform has come down the pike. The last was the Medicare buy-in.

At every turn, these changes have been scuttled by Joe, Snowe, Ben, Ben, Mary, Blanche or some combination. And then Rahm oozed over from the WH to snag Reid.

I have no more chips to play if I even had any to begin with. I have used up all my anger and disgust.

I play computer games a lot now to avoid my BP going up because it will if I hear the messages about one more chance.
I passed 'the Last Chance Saloon' a while back.

Please don't lecture me about what I better be doing because if I don't I obviously don't give a shit. I'm all out of shit too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC