Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medicare Buy-in a great Idea -- But for whom???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:26 PM
Original message
Medicare Buy-in a great Idea -- But for whom???
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 04:30 PM by TheCoxwain
If you are 55 and over and want to buy in to Medicare .. you are joining a pool where you are youngest of the old lot ... So you are going to subsidize them as opposed being subsidized by younger people until now ..


Insurance cos love it too .. they are getting the most expensive people off their rolls ...


So whom does this really benefit ... I am not saying this is bad .. I would love it If congress allows everyone to buy in .... but how will the risk get pooled when you draw the line at 55 as opposed to say 30.

Think a bit before you run to pop that champagne.




.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would have to see before making a determination.
I will say I cannot hang on until 65 with the annual increases at this point in the cost of my private insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you otherwise pay for your own insurance Medicare is a bargain
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 04:29 PM by stray cat
I would rather spend 1000 and subsidize someone than 15000 and subsidize no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There a was call in to the Brian Lehrer show where a 65 yr old woman said that her premium under
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 04:33 PM by TheCoxwain
Medicare was higher that what she paid a self employed the year before ( the plan was PPO with Aetna)

additionally - she found fewer doctors accepting medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I would like to know what that was.
Maybe she has been on Social Security for a couple of decades. As a self employed person, I have real doubts as to her authenticity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grilled onions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they don't already have a doctor
they may find it quite a challenge to get any regular doctors who will take Medicare. I have found I can get a specialist without much of a problem but GP's won't even take a first appt. That puts many in the under insured category. It may be a first step towards coverage for all but it certainly is a tiny step at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a bargain. Only twice as much as my current premiums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. my point exactly .. I bet the premiums would be higher that what a typical 55 year old would get
in the open market today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Might check that
I am on Medicare, my premiums are 96.00 month, if you know of a private policy that is lower please post it here and do a lot of people a big favor...hell even a supplement add on is 150+ that added to the 96 I already pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. How old are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wrong.
Medicare for those over 65 is paid for by everyone that pays taxes.

Any buy in pool (55, 45, whatever) is only covering those who are in the buy in pool.

And many who can't afford even the modest Medicare plan (which would be even MORE modest if the pool was larger and included younger adults) will be subsidized by taxes.

So those opting in to Medicare early are not being used to provide for those over 65.

People like me, who can't afford any individual insurance plan, will love it... just as soon as I turn 55 (about the time that it takes effect). What I will do between now and then, well, just what I've been doing, hope that I don't get sick (really sick, like cancer).

The rest of you that aren't close to 55, let's wait and see what else will be in the bill to contain insurance premiums. This ain't over yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. It will still be a bad deal for you as opposed to joining a non profit plan that covers everyone
as 55-65 is still higher risk compared to population as a whole ..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes, tell me where the non-profit plan IS right now that I can join
with my pre-existing heart condition? Especially one that won't drop me when I change employers or (like right now) I'm on extended unemployment.

Look, this isn't any progressives idea of a good health care reform plan (it never even started as health care reform, it started as health INSURANCE reform... and it's not great at that).

I would like to see Single Payer with the premiums paid for by tax increases on the wealthy.

Pretty sure that would meet with near universal approval here.

We ain't going to get it.

With the way that political campaigns are financed, we ain't gettin much of anything from our Aetna and Blue Cross Senators.

So we take what we can get right now, and start a new effort to have fewer corporate dems in the house and senate, and many, many fewer repukes and revisit this in another 4 years or 8 years or whenever.

We have a large populace of ignorant reactionary people who are easily swayed by astroturf efforts, and a very strong insurance lobby that likes bilking the public (and those ignorant reactionaries) for their personal profit. That system wasn't nearly as strong in the 60's when Medicare was passed. We have to start whittling them down to size.

Getting disgusted because we don't even have a "public option" and sitting on our hands next November and November in 2012 is the best way I know to give away any gains that we made, and certainly isn't going to get us "single payer" any sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Either way the fuck the youth idea
Is simply idiotic. They win over 60% of the under 30 vote in 2008 and they turn around an fuck them. They are giving the GOP a future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Exactly.
This is PISSING ME OFF!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. While I agree you shouldn't be screwed over, the reality is
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 05:26 PM by mmonk
those of us over 50 are really getting screwed with the status quo. We have to give up the insurance with the 20/80 coverage due to high premiums and go with HSA's with high deductables. Thing is, as you stay on it, the premiums eventually reaches the amount you had with the 20/80 coverage, but now you have a real high deductable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I agree you are getting fucked
However, saving youself at the expense of your children and grandchildren, isn't the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Continuing to roast in the present barbecue isn't either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, you know all of the details of the plan.
Please, we'd all like to hear exactly what it is going to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. It is a sham
It is another gift to the insurance lobby, they are taking the sector of society that is the most expensive overall where health care is concerned , then they will mandate it for the rest of the "younger" crowd to buy from the private insurance co's. That way the insurance companies get a guaranteed pool of money coming in from the lower risk segment.. it is all a phony deal in the end. Taxpayers foot the bill and give a HUGE christmas present to big insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. MEDICARE FOR ALL NOW!
One nation, one Cadillac plan - MEDICARE FOR ALL.

When the rich get exactly the same care as the poor, that's when we'll have a healthcare system that works for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeCanWorkItOut Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. A gift to insurance, yes. And too comfortable for other monopolies
No effort made to educate Americans about health.
None to increase access to nurse practitioners.
None to break up some of the hospitals' monopoly powers.
A burden on many elderly, on the states, and on many of the healthy poor.

(Why is it that if someone inherits a million, they pay no taxes at all,
but if someone is poor, and only inherits tolerable health, they overpay?
Sounds like a regressive tax system to me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC