Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Dean: 'That this must have been a White House-orchestrated operation: That fact is now clear.'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:00 PM
Original message
John Dean: 'That this must have been a White House-orchestrated operation: That fact is now clear.'
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's "Reconfirmation Hearings": Why, In the End, They Will Change Nothing

By John Dean
April 20, 2007


.....

Senator Charles Schumer (D.NY) toward the end of the proceeding told Gonzales that his continued evasive answers - there were over 100 questions to which he claim he could not recall the answer - left a clear impression on the Senator: Since no one in the Department of Justice could explain how some of the names got on the list of U.S. Attorneys to be fired, he could only conclude that this must have been a White House- orchestrated operation. I think this fact has become clear.

Some of the most important and revealing information during this hearing did not come from Gonzales, but rather from the newest member of the committee, freshman Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D.RI). Senator Whitehouse is the former Attorney General of Rhode Island, and a former U.S. Attorney. He thus understands well how the Justice Department should operate, and how it actually is operating.

In a premise to a question for Gonzales, Senator Whitehouse said he had found correspondence in the files of the Senate Judiciary Committee from the days when Orrin Hatch was chairman relating to an investigation of the relationship between the Clinton White House and the Justice Department (under Attorney General Janet Reno). Hatch was concerned about the independence of the Department of Justice, so he wanted to know who in the White House could speak with whom in the Justice Department. The correspondence showed that four people in the White House (the President, Vice President, chief of staff, and White House counsel) could speak with three people in the Justice Department (the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney and the Associate Attorney General) - period.

Senator Whitehouse discovered - and created a chart to make the point - that in the Bush White House, a shocking 417 people could speak with 30 different people in the Justice Department. It was a jaw-dropper. As Chairman Leahy said, when he asked Senator Whitehouse to continue when his time expired, in his thirty years on the Judiciary Committee, he had never seen anything like the open contacts from the White House to the Justice Department that had occurred in the Bush Administration.

Gonzales really had no response when asked about this subject. But this information shows that, in this Administration, the Department of Justice has become a mere political appendage of the White House. (I have a number of friends who are career professionals at the Department of Justice, and since Gonzales arrived, they have said that morale at the department has tanked, for they all feel the politicization of the place, and they do not like it. Many of these gifted, experienced professionals are leaving, which will hurt the Department, the government, and ultimately all of us.)

.....

Notwithstanding the lack of support Gonzales has in the Congress, and the damage he is causing the Bush Administration, he is not going to resign, and Bush is not going to fire him. Rather, Bush is going to, in effect, create a new, and far lower, standard for acceptable conduct by attorneys general. Bush is openly embracing the "Peter Principle" - the management theory that says that, as people within an organization advance to their highest level of competence, they will then be further promoted to, and remain at, a level at which they are incompetent. This has clearly occurred with Alberto Gonzales.

.....

As a former Department of Justice official, I find what Bush and Gonzales are doing to this once proud and independent department quite sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love John Dean.
He always nails it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me too.
K&R. Big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have to disagree with John Dean on this one.
Edited on Fri Apr-20-07 10:19 PM by spindrifter
What * and Gonzales are doing to the DOJ is not sad, it is unconscionable. Earlier today on firedoglake there was a pdf link to an anonymous letter sent to the judiciary committee by career staff at the DOJ, pointing out the way even the entry points to Justice through the summer intern program were being screwed with by the politicos. Instead of accepting recommendations of the various screening committees, they were rejecting any candidate who had any faint aroma of Democratic or liberal ties. The prevailing view was that rather than taking outstanding students, they preferred even bottom-half of the class people if they came from Harvard or Yale.
Remember a couple of years ago when someone from DOJ--a career staffer--was complaining that the Civil Rights section was languishing with no one being placed there when attorneys resigned?
The real point of the Anonymous Career Attorneys was that the DOJ doesn't belong to the WH. It doesn't belong to the political party in power at the moment. It belongs to the American people.

We are the ones who bear the responsibillity for seeing that the Department of Justice lives up to its name. It is not simply called the Office of the Prosecutor, for Chrissake. It is the Department of JUSTICE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Here is the link from firedoglake. The pdf file can be read there...
http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=262
The opening excerpt:

Dear Messrs. Chairman,

Many of us in the Department of Justice have been watching with admiration as you expose the overly political firing of United States Attorneys and hope that you can help in returning our beloved Department to of establishing justice in the United States. We are equally concerned, however, about the politicizing of the non-political ranks of Justice employees, offices which are consistently and methodically being eroded by partisan politics.

Many employees within the Department’s litigating divisions are sitting quietly by, hoping that you will investigate what has happened to the Attorney General’s Honors Program and even the Summer Law Intern Program (SLIP). You are surely aware that the Attorney General’s Honors Program has a long history of hiring top students from a variety of law schools, and it is the only way that young lawyers are able to come into the Department immediately after law school. This year the divisions once again pored over applications and resumes, choosing students to interview who demonstrated not only excellent grades but a real interest in the areas of law they might be hired to work in. After choosing potential candidates to interview, the division personnel forwarded their lists to the Office of Attorney Recruitment Management for what was traditionally final approval. This is no longer a final step, however, because the list had to go higher - to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. When the list of potential interviewees was returned this year, it had been cut dramatically.


The letter then goes on to describe confusion and consternation within the divisions, and ultimately a meeting that was demanded by staff, in which Michael Ellston, Chief of Staff to Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, “was offensive to the point of insulting” in addressing the concerns. (Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty has also testified regarding the firings of the US Attorneys.) Ellston attributed the removals from the interviewee lists to “spelling errors” and other such technical problems. The letter continues from there:

When division personnel staff later compared the remaining interviewees with the candidates struck form the list, one common denominator appeared repeatedly: most of those struck form the list had interned for a Hill Democrat, clerked for a Democratic judge, worked for a “liberal” cause, or otherwise appeared to have “liberal” leanings. Summa cum laude graduates of both Yale and Harvard were rejected for interviews.

The letter discusses further problems with the hirings, and adds that there are ample email records of the meeting that could be obtained. It concludes:

While the current political appointees repeatedly remind everyone that the U.S. Attorneys “serve at the pleasure of the President,” the Department’s career attorneys serve the people of the United States. We hope you will see fit to include this politicizing of the career ranks in your questioning of Attorney General Gonzales and his staff.
Thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. No wonder Gonzales is called "Fredo" - The real AG is Karl Rove
Gonzales is clearly nothing more than a water carrier - a hack at best. Karl Rove has been running the show, as it is imperative that millions of voters be disenfranchised for this crew to remain in power (yes, remain). Rigging the voting machines is too risky long term. This is much bigger than just Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. I agree with you. This is all about stealing and suppressing votes.
I think that a lot of Democrats and progressives are still in denial about the extent of the crisis that we face. Gore Vidal refers to the "coup" that took place when bush was appointed in 2000.

These people - relatively small number of multinational businesses and politicos - seek nothing less than total domination of the global market. They will stop at nothing to get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dean is right! So what questions can we ask the 08 candidates
to make sure this action doesn't continue? THAT'S what we should be thinking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Will the Lam investigation continue ? Will you pursue obstruction of justice charges against
the Bush administration ?

"It's all part of a growing ongoing investigation into corruption in defense and intelligence contracts, which already has sent former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham to prison and, legal sources say, may threaten others in Congress and the CIA. "

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12634250/

...and will you be investigating Ptech's software in the DOJ, WH, and DOE etc ?

Notable clientele
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Too little too late
if in fact it is all about stealing elections, which I believe is a huge part of it, then they will win, and it does not matter what you asked the '08 candidates. Because whomever the pugs end up nominating will be one of them, and it WILL continue.

This cancer has to be excised before '08. The investigations of every aspect of this administration need to continue apace, and sufficient probable cause to arrest the lot of them must be unearthed.

I am not kidding. I did not know Gore Vidal called it a coup - but I have been calling it that for years. Only it did not start in 2000 - it started in the late fifties. It has had fits and starts, first when Nixon lost to JFK, then when he botched Watergate. Reagan/Bush I made great strides in furthering their agenda, with broad deregulation, tax cuts and huge deficits. Clinton was an annoying interruption whom they hounded mercilessly in effort to keep him from getting much done while they groomed the chimpster to be their puppet, and got serious about disabling this annoying tendency for the people to elect other than their puppets. It took a huge leap forward when 9/11 happened. I continue to be highly skeptical of the 9/11 "inside job" claims, but damn, that sure worked out well for them. They sure "seized the moment."

People, we are at war. Our country is being (has been?) stolen from us from within, and there are some 300 million suckers still thinking about selecting the right candidate, playing by the rules.

Go get 'em Harry Reid! Go get 'em Nancy Pelosi! Go get 'em Henry Waxman! Go get 'em Patrick Leahy!

Keep the pressure on everywhere you can, keep turning the screws, and something will crack.

My fondest dream is to see kkkarl rove behind bars. Hell, if we can get him for treason I'll beg to be the one who throws the switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. The AG of the US and the Peter Principle? How sad for our country
Every day we have to wake up and feel such negative emotions about what has happened to our country. You say to yourself that it can't get worse, but it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. THanks for the article.
Well Mr. Dean has weighed in.

I agree Abu is not going anywhere.

The real pressing question I have is how is this going to be corrected before the 08s. We know the plan. We know the swing states that they are targeting. Tortuales said himself in the hearing that they were NOT going to retract the replacements. I am at a loss as to how the national election will be protected. I certainly don't want a "selected" dem candidate or president. There are 26 Senators up for re-election, I would like to see the dems have a heartier majority. This is the problem that needs to be addressed STAT!! We can put them all in jail later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. IS IT FASCISM YET?
I wish he understood that,

Great piece of writing, but it is hardly the Peter's Principle.
It is worse, it is like you have the nazi hacks running the war
and pillaging the art work of the world knowing that the time up.


The partisans are organizing and are not asleep any longer.

It is the fascist you are dealing with
not Peter or his principle, they think the masses
are sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. John Dean gets it
He's written an entire book about the authoritarianism of the modern right. It's called "Conservatives Without Conscience." He gets it just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
48. That is such an important piece of work - I wish more and more people
would read, or listen (books on tape) to that book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. It's been fascisim for years now - hard to decide exactly when it started
Maybe it was December 2000 - the day the Supreme Court stole the election for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. December 12, 2000 will forever be the day We The People became subjects.
And these right wing ideological-worshiping zealots, along with their vain and petulant king, have no intention of relinquishing power.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. It started in November of 1968
And has grown in momentum and virulence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is beyond Peter Principle incompetence. It's
deliberate and criminal stacking of the DOJ with Bush hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. I agree Cleita
I read the Peter Principle in HS, and BushCo is not a good example. BushCo is more akin to the Mafia, where loyalty to the "Don" and a few choice criminal actions are all you need to advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
49. At least the Mafia
has a code of honor. I would sooner trust the Mafia to run things in a democratic fashion than the power hungry zealots known as Republicans. Let's face it, there's no nice way to say Nazi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. It's not the Peter Principle at all.
The Peter Principle has a certain objective and formulaic, though flawed, logic to it. Employees with various levels of competence being promoted, because they have been successful in their work, until promoted to positions where they are no longer capable of being effective. The intent, though misguided, is essentially benign.

What is happening in the Justice Department, where people are selected solely on the basis of loyalty to the Bush regime, and where professional competency is simply not a selection criterion, doesn't, in my view, fit Peter Principle model. The intent in this case is 100% malevolent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have the overwhelming feeling that the entire country is simply
disintegrating around me. Anybody else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. No, Gloria, it's not just you
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Yes, Gloria I feel the same way.
The best analogy I can think of: It's being in a leaky lifeboat in the middle of the ocean with no way to plug the leaks,no life jackets and sharks circling the boat! The situation we find ourselves today started a l-o-n-g time ago, imho, for the maize of problems to exist as they do....it's a real time soap opera with no good ending in sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Moi aussi -- i.e.
Yup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. B* himself is a perfect example of The Peter Principle... except
he was never at any level of what should have been considered competent. I love John Dean too. He is in grief over the current state of affairs, as we all are.

K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. I respectfully disagree
per my previous post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. WOW! 35 Rec's but few kicks. Another kick for the a.m. crowd. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. "Department of Justice has become a mere political appendage of the White House"
THAT is what these hearings have to make abundantly clear.

The gross politicization of the DOJ perverts the rule of law upon which our nation was founded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Bingo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. See post #22. It all protects the "others" in the GOP and CIA
who are benefitting from The Octopus, a moniker that describes what Danny Casolaro and Gary Webb were investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Thank goodness for John Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. Sen. Whitehouse and his charts told the tale...
Edited on Sat Apr-21-07 10:24 AM by SaveOurDemocracy
:grr:


...In a premise to a question for Gonzales, Senator Whitehouse said he had found correspondence in the files of the Senate Judiciary Committee from the days when Orrin Hatch was chairman relating to an investigation of the relationship between the Clinton White House and the Justice Department (under Attorney General Janet Reno). Hatch was concerned about the independence of the Department of Justice, so he wanted to know who in the White House could speak with whom in the Justice Department. The correspondence showed that four people in the White House (the President, Vice President, chief of staff, and White House counsel) could speak with three people in the Justice Department (the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney and the Associate Attorney General) - period.

Senator Whitehouse discovered - and created a chart to make the point - that in the Bush White House, a shocking 417 people could speak with 30 different people in the Justice Department.
It was a jaw-dropper. As Chairman Leahy said, when he asked Senator Whitehouse to continue when his time expired, in his thirty years on the Judiciary Committee, he had never seen anything like the open contacts from the White House to the Justice Department that had occurred in the Bush Administration....



After watching Hatch coddle Gonzo, and even state that he suspected the motives of other committee members who continued to press for REAL, FACTUAL answers ... all I can say is ...OH, THE HYPOCRICY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. It has been said that Hatch wants to be the next attorney general
Assuming Bush would fire Gonzales, Hatch wants to be nice to Gonzales so he won't seem to be piling on the guy he wants to replace. I think he was the only Republican on the committee who was overtly favorable to the poor schlemiel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
50. When will the Hatch
Edited on Sat Apr-21-07 09:36 PM by The Wizard
closet be opened? Does Hatch have a secret NAMBLA membership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. If their true intent ...
is to destroy confidence in government, they are a "Catastrophic Success".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. John Dean is being too careful to call this the Peter Principle.
To all DUers outside the U.S. Please tell everyone you know that the United States of America does not practice democracy. We only export it.

Bush - worst President
Cheney - worst President
Gonzales - worst Atty Genl
and on and on

Shameless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Mais certainment!
And it is by design. Although the power brokers who installed this regime may have hoped that the administrations incompetency and failures would not be so apparent to the majority of Americans (the majority of the world, actually), Bush and Gonzolas are faithfully following their marching orders. This is why neither will back down because of public pressure -- public perception and opinion simply doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. Correction needed: Per the graph there are 42 in DOJ that were contacts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. Judgment at Nuremberg is on TCM right now....I just saw
Richard Widmark as the US army lawyer read from a manifesto from Adolf Hitler.....about being able to arrest anyone, without cause and without telling anyone where the person has gone...

Sound familiar??

I think I'm going to be sick...I've felt sick for years, though, so it's nothing new....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
38. Gonzo has ascended to a level of competence comparable w/the Chimp - the BOTTOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Balto Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. The Real Nightmare
Dick Cheney had a heart attack and died six months ago. His fewer and fewer public duties are now being performed by a double originally chosen as a security stand-in. George Bush is now clinically insane and is kept locked up in the basement of the White House where he is occasionally drugged and released to make speeches and public appearances during which he appears to be, well, drugged and insane. The Executive Branch of the government of the United States is now fully in the hands of "M. C." Rove and the Turd Blossums. The only thing that currently prevents a military coup d'etat is Rove's promise to cut off and eat the balls of any general who attempts to overthrow him. Condolezza Rice has a radio controlled bomb up her ass controlled by Rove which he has threatened to detonate if she attempts to explain the true situation in Washington to any of her diplomatic contacts while abroad. Rove is currently considering having plastic surgery and voice box alteration to make him look and sound like Rudolf Giuliani, upon which he will have the real Giuliani fitted for concrete overshoes, stage a fake assassination by a Korean exchange student, and then run for president on the Republican ticket. He will, of course, steal the election with the aid of his wingnut appointments to the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. That scenario doesn't sound all that far out these days.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. That explains
the look on Rice's face. The old sodomy bomb is ticking in her.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. All roads lead to Rove, huh?
I even made that up myself! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
epppie Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
42. Won't resign, won't be fired:
let him be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
44. Save Alberto! Hurry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
47. The epitome of the Peter Principle
is the pResident of the WHite House.

That prick DEFINES incompetence.

He's about 8 levels above his Peter Plateau.

His competence peaked when he sat his fat ass on a seat at Texas Stadium and shilled for the Rangers. He's been completely incompetent in EVERY other position before or since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC