Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The question that must be tied to "Do you support the Afghan War?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:52 PM
Original message
The question that must be tied to "Do you support the Afghan War?"
Is, in my opinion, "What do you think happened on September 11, 2001?".

If there is no doubt in your mind that the attacks were carried out by Al-Qaeda, then the war in Afghanistan is viewed as disposing of the forces who pose a major threat to the United States of America. You see this move by Obama as an attempt to stabilize this country that we so mishandled in the past, it is the least that we owe to its people.

If you think that the attacks were carried out by forces within our own government, then the war in Afghanistan is viewed as bringing about death and destruction to Afghanis for the enrichment of the military-industrial complex and for control of oil. The only thing resulting from this decision is the slaughter of innocent people, those who didn't want us there in the first place, in an attempt to eliminate people who in reality, pose no threat to us whatsoever.

Please, tell me if I am way off base. This is how I see it playing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I use the past tense. We are now disposing of
forces that posed a threat.

Actually, we disposed of forces that posed a threat to us. Now, we are being fought by an insurgency. We are the occupiers, and providing recruitment for radicalism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you can believe that al Qaeda is responsible and still be against the war...
Eight years later there are few al Qaeda members in Afghanistan, but many groups throughout the world.

I'd prefer a strategy that's about taking out training camps anywhere, but occupying no other country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joecool65 Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. You are way off base
"the attacks were carried out by forces within our own government"?
I will say this, anyone who believes that is the left-wing version of teabaggers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I am not saying I believe that.
I am saying that if that is how one feels, no explanation for anything other than immediate withdrawal will ever be good enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am both.
I believe AQ carried out the attacks on 911, but I also think the neo-cons used this as an excuse to control the oil pipelines.

"Afghanistan" did not attack us, therefore I am against the sledgehammer of the military. This was a criminal act and could have easily been dealt with using black-ops/special forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Out of sight - out of mind - eh Ruby?
And if we are talking about legality - black ops, or invading another soveriegn nation covertly and just TAKING someone or a groups of someones out - I am not sure that is legal.

The Taliban controlled Afghanistan when Al Quaeda was operating under their noses. They demanded evidence before giving them up to the Americans. Bush took that to mean that they were stalling and invaded - because they were knowingly harbouring terrorists. That is why the sledgehammer came down.

I am not saying that I agreed with that decision for the most part because I believe the attack on September 11 was a criminal act, a horrendous attack - but not an act of war. But that is behind us, and we cannot turn back the clock. We are there now. Pakistan is unstable - a nuclear armed unstable nation that is also facing threats from Al Quaeda. If you know that your enemy(which you admitted to) has retreated back into the hills, and has infiltrated Pakistan - you would just leave them be and say - that is good enough, time to go home now?

Out of sight, out of mind eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Nice try, no cigar.
Black Ops on those who attacked us. AlQaeda. Fine in my book.

Blanket attacks on Afghanistan and its civilian population? Nope.

911 was an act of war, but not by any middle-east nation/state. It was a criminal act by criminals who "happen" to be on the border of Afghanistan/Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. 4 airlines were highjacked by 19 medieval zealots, 2 crashed in NY, 1 in DC & 1 in PA.
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 07:01 PM by baldguy
But they wouldn't have succeeded without a lot of help in really high places.

edit: Afghanistan is a distraction. The real target for the Bush Regime was always Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. An oil pipeline hijacked the airplanes and killed everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. most of the hijackers (and a good chunk of money) came from Saudi Arabia.
when are we invading?

do you support an invasion of Saudi Arabia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC