Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Name It "The Bush Debt Tax"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 11:11 AM
Original message
Name It "The Bush Debt Tax"
Name It "The Bush Debt Tax"

-- by Dave Johnson

Christian_Dem_NY, a commenter over at Open Left has an idea,

... Enact a tax that applies ONLY to those that make $250,000 or more per year, and that only raises their top rate to 50% (which was the LOWEST rate under Reagan). Name that tax the "Bush Iraq Debt" tax, and use every penny from that tax to pay down the portion of the national debt that was created by Bush's war (with a built-in "self destruct" feature that makes the tax expire once Bush's war has been fully paid for). The teabaggers and Faux Noise and the rest of the right-wing noise machine will act as though Obama is the second coming of Stalin... but when grassroots Republicans get pissed off about the tax increase, they will look at that name "Bush Iraq Debt" tax and ask themselves: "Whom should I really blame for this tax? The man who spent the money to attack the wrong nation (Bush) or the man who just collected the money to get us out of debt Obama?"

http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2009/11/name_it_the_bus.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've got a better idea
Start the tax on people who make $250K, but realize that in some parts of the country, that's barely middle class. Increase the percentages until they're 90% on incomes over a million and confiscatory, say 99.5%, on income over 5 million. Include stock options, capital gains, and everything else in that.

Call it the REPUBLICAN DEBT TAX. Tell the plutocrats to expect a drop to 70% on the upper rate when they've paid back all their ill gotten gains.

That will give us a disincentive to the naked greed of the last 30 years while reminding people of exactly where the overspending came from.

Oh, and it wouldn't hurt to dismantle the REPUBLICAN EMPIRE at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Won't work because they will just turn into Dino's,
Like Ross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. i like your idea
quite a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Totally eliminate the federal income tax for anyone making $50K or less.
$100k for couples filing jointly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Better, just call it the Bush Wars Tax;
after all, he did start two of them...or three, if you count his war against the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Should be easy to identify the portion of the debt due to Bush's War
since the war funds were appropriated off-budget in a separate bill if I understand the process correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not entirely.
Making it more difficult was that a lot of on-budget equipment procurement and research went for Iraq-related goals.

Still, a wrong-headed idea. Sounds good on paper, but if we went there we'd be really upset with the muck around our waists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC