Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debunk this please Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:18 PM
Original message
Debunk this please Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist.
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 11:22 PM by white cloud
Help me with this freeper poo posted on forum.

http://www.texashuntingforum.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/1055863/Any_comments_from_the_left#Post1055863

I just got this in an email;



This is probably the most profoundly accurate article yet, dealing with Barak Obama. Please read it through to the end and see if you agree with me!

Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist. He has had nearly 30 years experience in planning, conducting, and managing research in the field of youth studies, and drug and alcohol research. Currently Dr.Hunt is a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Analysis and the Principal Investigator on three National Institutes on Health projects. He is also a writer for American Thinker.
Another Failed Presidency

An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt

Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson. In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China 20.

But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.

But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?

No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a narrative about himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, cleverly disguised or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and doesn't connect with us. He doesn't have an American narrative that draws upon the rest of us. All successful presidents have a narrative about the American character that intersects with their own where they display a command of history and reveal an authenticity at the core of their personality that resonates in a positive endearing way with the majority of Americans. We admire those presidents whose narratives not only touch our own, but who seem stronger, wiser, and smarter than we are. Presidents we admire are aspirational peers, even those whose politics don't align exactly with our own: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, and Reagan.

But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, and is historically illiterate and woefully small minded for the size of the task--all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us.. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.

In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us--financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job. Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."

Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.

Yes, small presidents do fail, Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, nothing to debunk.
It's solid bullshit--don't touch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. It's a fake attribution about the author. See post 6 and follow the link
Quote: As of October 2009, the Institute has received several inquires regarding an August 31, 2009 article in the American Thinker. Mr. Geoffrey P. Hunt (the actual author of the article), as far as we can ascertain, is an executive in the electronics industry and a regular contributor to the American Thinker. His work has been attributed to Geoffrey P. Hunt, PhD, Senior Scientist at ISA. Please note Dr. Hunt has never written anything for the American Thinker and would appreciate any help in rectifying this case of mistaken authorship / identity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't it odd this nutso
list all democrats as failed. When he had Nixon, Reagan, George the first and George the Second. That ought to tell you right there he is pushing crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishka Kibble Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Everybody's a critic.
Everybody who claims to be affiliated with "National Institutes On Health" programs is obviously trying to make people believe he is somehow involved with the real NIH - which is the National Institute Of Health."

Also, I checked out Mr. Hunt's primary employer. It's rather unimpressive, unless annual sales of $6,000 are someone's idea of big time money.

Not a mention anywhere of his academic history, so what he might be in an Orly Taitz, a correspondence-course, online "doctorate" obtained in the shoddiest imaginable circumstances and with no academic value or prestige.

I found this comment:

"The author of this article is not Dr. Geoffrey P. Hunt. The Institute for Scientific Analysis bio for Dr. Hunt notes this misrepresentation of the articles author at the bottom of the page. None of my research has brought to light any information on Mr. Geoffrey P. Hunt, the journalist who writes for American Thinker, a predominantly right-wing online publication. The American Thinker provides no biographical information as to Mr. Geoffrey P. Hunts qualifications or experience."

at this site: http://www.sodahead.com/living/another-failed-presidency---geoffrey-p-hunt/question-687155/

I would ask the person who sent you this article to send you some information about the qualifications and academic training of the author. That should bring this shoddy, failed, and uninformed exercise in character assassination to a speedy end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Thanks!!!
They fooled me completely.

Typical tactics from a bankrupt bunch of ethically challenged shitheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Why do they always have to LIE ????
LIE about climate change
LIE about Obama
LIE about Clinton

LIES, LIES, and more goddamed LIES because they cannot win with the truth.

Just look at all the lies that Andrew Sullivan has listed for Sarah Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. For starters the use of his credentials is a false appeal to authority.
There is nothing derived from his knowledge of anthropology in the article. It is just the misguided opinion of an ideologically oriented freeper venting bile.


I checked a few of his papers on google scholar and his specialty seems to be youth issues, with a preference for writing about old English village life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I found this tidbit at the ISA website:
http://www.scientificanalysis.org/huntbio.html

As of October 2009, the Institute has received several inquires regarding an August 31, 2009 article in the American Thinker. Mr. Geoffrey P. Hunt (the actual author of the article), as far as we can ascertain, is an executive in the electronics industry and a regular contributor to the American Thinker. His work has been attributed to Geoffrey P. Hunt, PhD, Senior Scientist at ISA. Please note Dr. Hunt has never written anything for the American Thinker and would appreciate any help in rectifying this case of mistaken authorship / identity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. American Thinker is a far right propaganda rag. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. That It Is An Article From 'The American Thinker', Sir, is Sufficient
It is a very light-weight wing-nut site; if you are in the mood for some very low entertainment, check it out....

http://www.americanthinker.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. The identification of Geoffrey P. Hunt is incorrect - from American Thinker
American Thinker: At the end of the article:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/another_failed_presidency.html

From another source (Lance Zabrowski): "Mr. Geoffrey P. Hunt (the actual author of the article), as far as we can ascertain, is an executive in the electronics industry and a regular contributor to the American Thinker." http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:4-xVezGhlsoJ:www.ekartingnews.com/viewtopic.php%3Ft%3D89181%26view%3Dprevious%26sid%3D5630a4a6dab8e9df315ab21283711658+%22Geoffrey+P.+Hunt%22&cd=28&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&lr=lang_en

This seems to be the correct Geoffrey P. Hunt:
Company Name OSRAM SYLVANIA INC
Street Address 100 ENDICOTT ST # 1
DANVERS, MA 01923
Contact Name GEOFFREY P HUNT
Phone # (978) 777-1900
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Narkos Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Guy's a nut. American Thinker is an Uber Wingnut site, so there you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. ruined there turkey day already.
Thanks guys so much. Now I have to go ruin there the freepers day again. They are getting really tired of me debunking them with fact.
You DU and members have been great help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Narkos Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. MONEY SHOT!!! Osram Sylvania got stimulus money!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC