Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Corps of Engineers found at fault over Katrina damage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:50 PM
Original message
Army Corps of Engineers found at fault over Katrina damage
Edited on Wed Nov-18-09 09:58 PM by dixiegrrrrl
breaking on Rachel.and damn well about time.

More from Times-Picayune:


Corps' operation of MR-GO doomed homes in St. Bernard, Lower 9th Ward, judge rules
By Mark Schleifstein, The Times-Picayune
November 18, 2009, 8:00PM


In a groundbreaking decision, a federal judge ruled late Wednesday that the Army Corps of Engineers' mismanagement of maintenance of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet was directly responsible for flood damage of homes in St. Bernard Parish and the Lower 9th Ward of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval Jr. could result in the federal government paying $700,000 in damages to three people and a business in those areas, but also sets the stage for judgments against the govenment for damages by as many as 100,000 other residents, businesses and local governments in those areas who filed claims with the corps after Katrina.

If successful, the damage claims could total billions of dollars.

http://www.nola.com/hurricane/index.ssf/2009/11/post_16.html

One of the best hurricane experts in N.O. was fired by the state after he said theCorps. was responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. And i LOVE how Maddow immediately re-jiggered the show tonite to get a full segment on it...
with a knowledgeable person. How awesome is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I find the people that build a city
below sea level at fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They didn't built a defective levee.
Edited on Wed Nov-18-09 09:59 PM by EFerrari
And are we really so witless that we can't do as well as the Dutch?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Dutch did a fine job
Of course there isn't very many hurricanes in Holland. I wonder how those levees in Holland would stand up to a cat 4 hurricane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Except they knew that they'd shorted the levee footing.
They didn't build it to spec and then get bested by a hurricane. They built it substandard.

Maybe that's the part that I'm still mad about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Louisiana1976 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not all of New Orleans is below sea level--the more desirable areas
such as the French Quarter are above sea level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Very true!
The French Quarter didn't flood. That's why the rich folk live there, they made sure the poor people got the swampland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. I doubt it
My husband is an engineer. Engineers over engineer. They don't under engineer. They take their plans to the bosses and they say oh no that costs too much do something that costs less money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Um, everyone remembers when Bu**sh** cut the COE budget?
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 02:11 AM by eppur_se_muova
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0905/090105jv1.htm

Ex-Army Corps officials say budget cuts imperiled flood mitigation efforts

By Jason Vest and Justin Rood [email protected] September 1, 2005

As levees burst and floods continued to spread across areas hit by Hurricane Katrina yesterday, a former chief of the Army Corps of Engineers disparaged senior White House officials for "not understanding" that key elements of the region's infrastructure needed repair and rebuilding.

Mike Parker, the former head of the Army Corps of Engineers, was forced to resign in 2002 over budget disagreements with the White House. He clashed with Mitch Daniels, former director of the Office of Management and Budget, which sets the administration's annual budget goals.

"One time I took two pieces of steel into Mitch Daniels' office," Parker recalled. "They were exactly the same pieces of steel, except one had been under water in a Mississippi lock for 30 years, and the other was new. The first piece was completely corroded and falling apart because of a lack of funding. I said, 'Mitch, it doesn't matter if a terrorist blows the lock up or if it falls down because it disintegrates -- either way it's the same effect, and if we let it fall down, we have only ourselves to blame.' It made no impact on him whatsoever."
***
Parker -- who, along with members of his family, was forced to evacuate his Mississippi farm on Sunday night -- drew media attention (and the White House's ire) in 2002 by telling the Senate Budget Committee that a White House proposal to cut just over $2 billion from the Corps' $6 billion budget request would have a "negative impact" on the national interest. Parker also noted that cuts would mean the end of scores of contracts and the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.

After Parker's Capitol Hill appearance, Daniels wrote an angry memo to President Bush, writing that Parker's testimony "reads badly. . . on the printed page," and that "Parker. . . distancing actively from the administration." Parker, a former Republican congressman from Mississippi, was forced to resign shortly thereafter.
***
more at the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Louisiana1976 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks for this post--I recall having read that Bush cut the COE budget
so he could afford tax cuts for his rich friends. Which makes him responsible for New Orleans' drowning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Check the age of those levees and sea walls
believe they predate the Bush administration by many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. Facts and opinions are 2 different things.
Fact: John Barry's book Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 details very well the beginning of the problem, including the poor planning that led to severe flooding of the river, and subsequent decisions
and shortcuts which created levee problems, specifically the Gulf-Outlet Canal.
I suggest anyone seriously interested in actually knowing about New Orleans and the levees read it.

Fact: Ivor Van Heerden, the scientist who led the state's independent investigation into Hurricane Katrina levee failures, was fired for stating the truth. He had warned for years of the levee problem.
"It is no surprise that van Heerden has been fired, as he has also been very critical of the LSU administration. His May 2006 book, The Storm: What went wrong and why during Hurricane Katrina--the inside story from one Louisiana scientist, tells of a case in November 2005 after Katrina where two LSU assistant chancellors told him to stop talking to the press, because it was "hurting LSU's quest for federal funding across the board."
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2009/04/lsu_hurricane_s.html
(van Heerden was given another job, it states in the story.)
but still was a shock to hear of his removal from his important post at the Hurricane Center.

For a good review I suggest Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivor_van_Heerden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC