What is the best way to characterize people who wanted the House health care bill to pass?
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:01 PM
Original message
Poll question: What is the best way to characterize people who wanted the House health care bill to pass?
Note that this includes the people who voted for it. Variations of these four choices have floated around here. What is the consensus?
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's certainly not a perfect bill
but it does give us a few things to work with, like getting rid of their antitrust exemption. Whether or not any of the good stuff passes the corrupt Senate is the question. It's just too soon to say. (Given a rec to frustrate that Freeper with no life who unrecs every post)
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hopefully the Senate will actually kill the worst part
of the House bill, the Stupak amendment.
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't hold your breath on that one
My guess is that there are enough antichoice assholes in there to keep it alive and well, unlike the half of the population it throws under the bus.
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, I don't think Reid has any choice but to leave it out of
the bill before the amendment process. Both HELP and Finance rejected Stupak amendment's language.
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Isn't that repeal of the anti-trust exemption only as good as the administration in office
. . . and the willingness and effectiveness of the FTC in regulating the industry? I agree that it's a good part of the bill, but I'm going to have to wait to see what this administration actually does to regulate and force states to unravel the protections they've relied on in the past to allow the monopolies to flourish.
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Private suits for antitrust violations are a current part of the law.
cable companies, Microsoft--lots of corporations get sued under them.
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
no need to think that insurance companies and drug manufacturers will get treated any differently.
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. document discovery alone will be a hellacious
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 12:26 PM by geek tragedy
:evilgrin:
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Nov-11-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Five points from Gryffindor for excessive nuance.
Obfuscation is a weapon of the Dark Lord. (:thumbsup:)
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.