Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Hater"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:42 PM
Original message
"Hater"
I find it pretty amazing how freely the word "hate" and all its derivatives are thrown about.

Do you really think someone who disagrees with you is a "hater"? Really? That's pretty strong stuff.

Guys in white sheets who ride at night might be haters.

But people who disagree with you on some point or other in a political debate? They're "haters"?

If you're such an inarticulate clod that "hater" is the best form of "neener neener" you can come up with, maybe a time out is in order.

How is calling someone you NEVER MET a "hater" a viable part of a debate, the point of which is usually to convince someone to agree with you. And I agree. You will not ever be able to get everyone to agree with you.

But to call them "haters"? That shows YOU to be a fool and it causes those truly deserving of the descriptor to get a pass.

Lots of people who post here at DU are increasingly unhappy with the direction of the Obama administration on one, or several, or many issues. Maybe even everything about him.

But do they "hate" him? Really? Do you really know what "hate" even means?

That's really foul.

And shame on you if you're guilty of saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hater has a different meaning in pop culture
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 04:50 PM by ecstatic
And that could be causing some confusion.

Shortened version of "player hater:"

1. A person that simply cannot be happy for another person's success. So rather than be happy they make a point of exposing a flaw in that person.

Hating, the result of being a hater, is not exactly jealousy. The hater doesn't really want to be the person he or she hates, rather the hater wants to knock someone else down a notch.

2. A label applied to people who are more negative than positive when discussing another person. It most commonly refers to individuals whose negativity is so extreme that it is all-consuming. However, there are various levels and forms of being a hater, ranging from completely dismissing any positive traits or actions, to merely painting a less than flattering picture by using words with negative connotations. Hating is often attributed to jealousy, but just as often, it seems to stem from some other source.


-UrbanDictionary.com lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've been called a hater for merely pointing out the fact that the yankees bought their
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 04:49 PM by madinmaryland
world series championship.

I guess that they hate having folks point out the obvious to them.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I admit to calling those teabaggers
holding their offensive signs 'haters' because I believe they genuinely hate Obama. Yes, they are misguided, ignorant and manipulated by Limpball and Beckkk types, but they still are haters. You know what? I hate them. And I very rarely use that word. Sometimes the word is appropriate and neener-neener doesn't cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. No need to apologize for that. That isn't even what this post is about.
I would be willing to bet that some - probably not all - of the teabagger types do, indeed, hold hatred for some people. And for some of them, I can tell you that I approach holding the same feelings for them.

This post is about people here on the DU who call others here on the DU "haters".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. When one approaches me online in a hostile manner that they likely would not in real life
... I usually consider that person a 'hater' of sorts.

Re what you're driving at about Obama, though, that's just the required framing that those who can't stand it that there isn't a mindless majority in lockstep, and so need to lash out, but obviously can't do so for the real reasons, and so adopt this "You HATE Obama!" window dressing in hopes of adding legitimacy to their spew ... that, again, is actually about lack of uniformity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have never met Rush Limbaugh yet I will call him a Hate Monger as I understand the term to mean.
Any person that creates hatred by their actions and words as Limbaugh does is a Hate Monger.. I doubt I am the only person to feel this way..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I happen to agree with you, to a point.
Limbaugh can CERTAINLY be accused of spreading and inciting hatred. So can Beck and all the rest.

But even for them, I can not say they hate anyone. I don't know. I DO know that hate is an awful thing. I also know that Rush, et al, make money by "hating" ..... whether feigned or genuine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm trying to reply in a way that encompasses all of my thoughts
on this, but I can't, so the only thing I can say is Thank You.


Where I come from, name-calling isn't considered an adult form of discussion.

neener neener indeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Ha..hey, I frequent forums dedicated to weirdo sub-cultures that haven't as much name-calling as DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. People appropriating youth slang to appear hep
As Ella Fitzgerald said, "Ain't nothing squarer than a hep square."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. The person who uses "hater" is no more foolish than the person who uses...
"Obamabot" or "Messiah" or the myriad silly terms used for Obama and his supporters on DU.

Both sides do it, of course. They're shortcuts intended to end debate, used to avoid providing a rational basis for one's argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No, both sides do NOT do it.
I've yet to see a single "Obamabot" post that isn't in direct response to an attack. All you need to do to get a "hater" post is suggest that Obama is somehow less than perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You see what you want to see.
And so does the other side.

My side is always perfectly polite and only responds to attacks.

The other side is always nasty and snide and attacks me for no reason.

Those beliefs are as old as DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. What I see is you making an assertion without evidence
If "both sides do it", show us one example. Just one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You simply cannot be serious.
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 06:05 PM by TwilightZone
After a year-plus of "Messiah" bullshit on this site, you honestly believe that?

Really?

Please tell me that you're joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Right, I'm asking you for evidence. Truly beyond the pale.
:eyes:

If it was so obvious, you should have no problem providing a single link to one unprovoked "Obamabot" or "messiah" attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ok, now I'm sure that you're just yanking my chain.
Anyone who has spent any time whatsoever on this site knows that silly, pointless attacks are made daily by every side on pretty much every issue.

It's simply impossible that you believe otherwise. Thanks for the laugh, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Like I said: you made an assertion that you can't back up.
My position is that the two groups are not exhibiting equivalent behavior. The groups throwing around "hater" do it at pretty much any post critical of Obama. I've yet to see a single person throw out "messiah" or "Obamabot" in response to a purely positive Obama post (as opposed to one that's a veiled attack).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. And again. Another unprovoked attack on "haters"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8749828&mesg_id=8749879

This time, we also get compared to Karl Rove. Nice.


Still waiting on a single link supporting your claim...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Thank youThere has been a self-segregation on DU since before the end of the Primaries.
The strong Obama supporters have pretty much stayed in GD-Pol and people who were not such strong supporters, or who simply prefer(ed) not to engage in singing with the choir, stayed or moved to GD. The trouble happens when the groups try to mix. Some posters successfully exist in both worlds. Some not so much.

When big things happen, like this health care thing, the defenders and the detractors, the happy and the disappointed, the supportive and the sanquine, put on their Bloods and Crypts suits and get ready to rumble.

There really is a divide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. a few people are
though I've never called them that, because it's a Republican meme, We were all "Bush-Haters" according to them.

But, for example, post something about Nader, and you will see some genuinely hateful posts.
Real haters do exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. I am sure the people who deny rights to same sex couples are sweet...
Sorry they are deserving of vengeful backlash for their ignorance and HATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. Too late to rec but good point.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Been called a "hater" so many times on DU
if I didn't agree with their point of view. It's sad, really, that people have to resort to using that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
25. I know that those who toss that word about
live in wee protected bubbles, and always have. They have never seen the real thing, and they know not what they are saying. It makes them seem like suburban bumpkins of limited experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC