|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:41 PM Original message |
| It's Official: Lieberman going to Block Senate HCR Bill. Now on MSNBC |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| villager
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. it's time to break this little fucker, and all the Republicans |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 26. Why take anything out of the bill that was weaken enough |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 59. +++++++++ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Anytime now. The big reveal. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. The Repuke party can have him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. what a pain in the a$$ this guy is, isn't he listening to American |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WeDidIt
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 15. He's figuring on killing health care reform, the Dems get the blame |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 18. And step 4 and 5 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 22. If Holy Joe kills HCR, Holy Joe will get the blame.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 38. I have to disagree with your analysis. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ipaint
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 56. Exactly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Razoor
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. lieberman is a idiot! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ironman3476
(81 posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. It depends on whether you include his wifes whoring. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. This will make a lot of people here at DU very happy... | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onehandle
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Go nuclear. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Solutions? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Contrary1
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 20. No it doesn't get the bill passed, but on the plus side... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaKerryDem
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 32. No, but it would apply pressure on him.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 44. The point - at some point you have to make an example of someone. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Winterblues
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-10-09 04:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 68. It may not get this bill passed but it will put all on Notice of the consequences |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Aramchek
(929 posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. we just made a huge step forward, of course the opponents are trying to tell us this is a dead end |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. Only if it contains the non-functional public option. Lieberman is giving cover for all the other |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Lieberman will not be able to stop HCR. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. it's also a 'fuck you' to the President..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 28. I think he's helping Obama remove the non-fuctioning PO and the drug price negotiations |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ipaint
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 57. Well if this thread is any indication... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
|
Tue Nov-10-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 71. Obama-bashing BS. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. At least Dennis Kucinich will be happy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 21. More proof--this is a manufactured talking point. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-10-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 62. yep. walks like a duck. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-10-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 64. Are you disputing the fact that Kucinich does not want this bill to pass? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
|
Tue Nov-10-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 69. who knows what he wants for the Senate bill? Where is it? It's not even out yet. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 23. as are you, methinks.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-10-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 65. Youthinks incorrectly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Strip him! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| no_hypocrisy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 19. And do it RIGHT AWAY after passing the HCR. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 51. Strip him right now |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Contrary1
|
Mon Nov-09-09 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Get rid of him! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaKerryDem
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. I'm thinking it was a mistake to keep this little prick in the caucus.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Isn't Lieberman supported by Insurance Companies... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 39. He will work to weaken it more and make it even better for the Insurance Industry. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| optimator
(228 posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. who's going to stop him? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| msongs
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. that's what happens when you aim low and go down from there nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 31. Moronic. If it was Medicare for All, you'd have more Dems joining him. At least Kennedy knew this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. Joe is a WHORE...(sorry to Tarts and Strumpets) He has sold his sorry skinny ASS to the GOPiacs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Fuck you Joe Liebermann |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. Come back next year, which will be perfect for upcoming elections. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 37. Sure. Let 44 thousand more die. Nice solution. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 40. Those 44 thousand are going to be covered in January, 2010??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 41. Yes, there is a temporary insurance pool for immediate assistance |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 42. You could have provided a temporary pool before REAL reform passed... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 43. For fucks sakes I'm tired of you purists. Single Payer or nothing, right? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 47. Thank you for giving me permission... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 50. Forgive me if I don't go along with your all-or-nothing bullshit. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 55. AS I TOLD YOU BEFORE... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 46. If it doesn't pass this year it won't next year. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 52. Who says? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. Reconciliation-This Isn't Funny Anymore |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Then we need to "block" HIS health care, paid for |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
|
Mon Nov-09-09 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 45. Sickening |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 48. Kucinich would have blocked it if he could have, but there is no Filibuster in the House. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 49. I disagree and you have no proof of that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 53. Kucinich voted with repubs on climate change |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 54. And I heard that he's trying to foment more anti-Moslem hysteria |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 58. He has just signed his political death warrant -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 60. Maybe now is the time to push for a bill ending the ability to be hired by campaign contributors... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
|
Mon Nov-09-09 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 61. We'll see. It will be to extract a price. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
|
Tue Nov-10-09 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 63. It is beyond discussion at this point |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-10-09 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 66. What we need is a nuclear 50 for a full and robust PO on a 100% open exchange threat |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LatteLibertine
(763 posts)
|
Tue Nov-10-09 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 67. Why don't the Democrats |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
|
Tue Nov-10-09 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 70. Strip this bastard's chairmanships! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 21st 2009, 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC