|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:45 AM Original message |
| Dennis = Nader. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Heathcare reform just got delayed a lot longer than 9 years. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. I am so, so happy that you and people who support your position failed tonight. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:52 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Just curious, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. Nope. And anyone who calls this "shit in a can" either is uneducated or lying. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 12. Not a can. Your hand. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. Quick question: If there were a bill that helped the uninsured AND helped those of Big Pharma |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:09 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 18. Because this bill does more harm than good. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
|
Sun Nov-08-09 09:52 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 50. Can't tell, haven't read it. We're all just relying on others' opinions. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spoony
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:53 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. Hmm, seems like you're more happy about the "failure" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 11. I believe the DKers are parasites to our party. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sebastian Doyle
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:17 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 19. Allow me to correct the typo in your last post..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
|
Sun Nov-08-09 10:31 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 53. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:37 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 24. i am a parasite? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 26. Are you for real? PARASITES! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 02:31 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 27. Why bother having a "liberal" Democrat in the caucus when they don't vote with Democrats? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
|
Sun Nov-08-09 02:37 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 28. What good does it do to vote with Dems if |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:02 AM Response to Reply #28 |
| 31. I don't know who you are. But it regardless of what you might or might not say |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:07 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 34. More millions will be left out of this bill. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bluetrain
(992 posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:29 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 58. Over half of the country is left out of this bill. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
|
Sun Nov-08-09 10:28 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 52. Does this benefit everyone? It will help some of course...but |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Xicano
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:26 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 36. Using your own logic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Sun Nov-08-09 09:04 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 49. "The highest priority in the past century?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quakerboy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 60. If there is a "special place" for people who run as dems, then vote to defeat |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 16. +! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Aramchek
(929 posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. and he accomplishes about as much |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. Not really. Nader wouldn't even support Gore for the election. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. I love Dennis!! Nader too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Electric Monk
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. IBTL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Enrique
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. Dennis's vote didn't have the consequences that Nader's run did |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. Damn the DLC! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Oregone
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. I prefer both to many corprotists Dems |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 17. And as you said in another thread, you have insurance and this bill wouldn't help you. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Oregone
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 22. As I said in another thread, I'm not desperate for shit as a Stockholm victim |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quakerboy
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:37 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 61. How about me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. ego wins for these two. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. Bravo for both men of integrity rather than cheaply bought politicians. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:41 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 25. yes it amazes me just how cheaply they sell us out. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
|
Sun Nov-08-09 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. = ego |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
|
Sun Nov-08-09 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. Dennis isn't fit to shine Nader's shoes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
| 30. Deleted message |
dana_b
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:05 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. that's the second time I've seen you use that word |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
|
Sun Nov-08-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #32 |
| 54. It's a good one! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:06 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 33. At least I'm not willing to let 40,000 die every year just because the bill doesn't punish |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:48 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 39. That's why I want to know what these people are smoking... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fading Captain
(709 posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 08:45 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 43. I'm originally from Canada. People there *knew* what victory was |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Inuca
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:38 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 38. Absolutely. That's why the insurance |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fading Captain
(709 posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 08:49 AM Response to Reply #38 |
| 44. Trust me, if the insurance industry was 100 percent against this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Go2Peace
(537 posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 35. You really believe this is "Reform"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
|
Sun Nov-08-09 05:00 AM Response to Reply #35 |
| 41. invaded by fucking idiots |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
|
Sun Nov-08-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #41 |
| 55. One in the same. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
|
Sun Nov-08-09 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 37. I dont like Dennis, but I will say one thing about him. He's never run for Prez in a third party |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:24 AM Response to Reply #37 |
| 56. ...yet |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 04:58 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. I support both Kucinich & Nader and despise corrupt corporatists of both parties. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
|
Sun Nov-08-09 05:01 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. You mean insurancecare. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
|
Sun Nov-08-09 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 45. Dennis isnt a corporate whore. like some on here seem to like. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:31 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 59. False dichotomy fail |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncteechur
|
Sun Nov-08-09 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 46. I like Dennis Kucinich but he is not President and has the same legislative power as John Boehner. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| western mass
(529 posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 47. Do corporate lobbyists get paid overtime |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Sun Nov-08-09 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
| 48. Epic Fail |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:38 AM Response to Reply #48 |
| 62. Even if it was a fail, at least he offered a reason for his assertion |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 51. Deleted message |
| bluetrain
(992 posts)
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 57. Sounds to me like someone got turned down at the baths. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 21st 2009, 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC