pinto
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 05:52 PM
Original message |
| I renounce the Party of No. |
 |
Yeah change is hard. Occasionly it comes suddenly, beyond our control. Yet sometimes changes are within our purview. Those tend to be gradual.
The US House seems on the verge of approving one step to join other nations in affording access to health care for our citizens.
I renounce the Party of No for their opposition to such a basic improvement for health care in the US.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I am astonished by the fact that the rethugs, who are so against helping |
 |
the majority of the population with expensive health care, have not gotten more attention. Why is nobody making this an issue? The Dems seemed to have had a golden opportunity, but didn't use it. And forget the media. I didn't expect anything from them.
|
cry baby
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. may I join you in the renouncement? nt |
Mme. Defarge
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message |
DearAbby
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
patrice
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Can I get some brownie-points with "God" or whoever for not HATING those fuckers? 'cause |
tblue
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. New Republican Party logo: |
pinto
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-08-09 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Yep. That's all they've got. We may not be unified in our range of political opinions, yet |
 |
we've *got* a range of political opinions within the party. Diversity's messy, but it counts. It's our challenge and our strength.
The Party of No has become a side note in the discourse. A failed contestant in this week's reality show segment.
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-07-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. The party of No and their Blue Dogs... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 21st 2009, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message |