debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 05:45 PM
Original message |
| Speaker Pelosi: THIS WON'T GO UNANSWERED - Please read & kick & recommend |
 |
I am so angry now I could spit. My hands are shaking as I write this....
I called Speaker Pelosi's office in California about 15 minutes ago. I politely started to state my concerns about the removal of single payer debate on the House floor (the Weiner amendment) & the removal of the Kucinich amendment (allowing states to implement single payer). With just one word: hold, I was put through by the office staff to the answering machine. I left a message on the machine and then called the Washington office.
I got right through and the second I told them what the call was about, I was directed to an answering machine. I wasn't even told to hold.
So, I called right back and I said, I am calling to ask a question. Has Nancy Pelosi directed her staff to not speak directly with those who call about the Weiner Amendment or the Kucinich Amendment?
He told me the office has been INUNDATED with calls about these amendments for the past two weeks and do to the volume of these calls, they just put them through to voicemail.
So, I said that people who were calling to express their very concerns about these issues were being relegated to an answering machine?
Pelosi's official staff policy is for her staff not to speak with those who call about Single Payer. I wonder if they even listen to the messages or they just go to automatic delete!
Anyway, at this point, I told him that Pelosi is ignoring these callers and the issue of Single Payer and real health care reform at her own peril. I told him the democratic/liberal base that the party has taken for granted for so long is on the verge of breaking and that the health care reform will be the final straw. I told him that the democratic leadership so poorly represents the views & beliefs of their liberal base (the majority of people) that they are giving us no reason to support the democrats. I told him that the smartest, most creative part of the democratic party (the progressive base) is seriously on the verge of third party and if this is the way we are treated when we call about a life or death issue, they have made the decision for us. I then told him that I will be making a video and letting the blogosphere know that the Speaker is LITERALLLy ignoring mass numbers of calls about these two amendments.
I will not let this type of disdain to the people go unanswered.
This is where we are at people. They don't give a rat's ass what policies we want - they don't even want to hear our voices. Even though the MAJORITY of Americans want a REAL public option (one where the actaul public can enroll), we will not get it; just a ironic joke piece of legislation that creates a phony public option that is more expensive then private insurance and only 2% would be eligible for anyway. They get FLOODED...INUNDATED with calls for the Weiner amendment and the Kucinich amendment...
They won't take your call. Even when the lines aren't busy and their staff is free to taalk. I got through to both offices on the very first ring, all three times I called.
So, KNOW that the people are speaking. Know that the calls are being made and that the lines are ringing off the hook for real health care reform.
They just won't pick up the phone.
|

Maybe it's time to consider a new Speaker of the House |
derby378 |
Nov-04-09 05:47 PM |
#1 |
 
uhmmmm ... Grayson ? |
Myrina |
Nov-04-09 05:49 PM |
#4 |
  
Be still my heart. |
robinlynne |
Nov-04-09 05:59 PM |
#14 |
  
Amen to THAT! |
Plucketeer |
Nov-04-09 06:57 PM |
#40 |
   
Grayson doesn't have enough seniority. I say Barbara Lee |
jgraz |
Nov-04-09 07:26 PM |
#45 |
  
Oops! |
Cleita |
Nov-04-09 08:20 PM |
#51 |
   
Double oops! |
Cleita |
Nov-04-09 08:22 PM |
#52 |
  
Seniority is, as seniority does. He's got the heart of an old warrior. |
Joe Chi Minh |
Nov-05-09 06:51 AM |
#137 |
   
Yes, but he's nowhere near as skilled at herding cats as someone like Lee would be. |
jgraz |
Nov-05-09 12:28 PM |
#165 |
  
In the current climate, I expect you're on the mark. |
Joe Chi Minh |
Nov-05-09 02:19 PM |
#195 |
  
from your keyboard to God's monitor |
davidwparker |
Nov-05-09 04:24 PM |
#221 |
  
That's funny. Grayson supports the house bill. |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 10:48 AM |
#155 |
 
Because he will get be on our side, not big crapsurance. |
grahamhgreen |
Nov-05-09 11:34 AM |
#159 |
 
Do you think the House bill is crap? |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 11:59 AM |
#161 |
 
How do you think that you could force that when you can't |
TexasProgresive |
Nov-04-09 08:16 PM |
#50 |
  
It's becoming apparent to the entire nation that our democracy is turing into a corporatocracy |
bjobotts |
Nov-05-09 01:10 AM |
#111 |
 
with its army of lobbyists pulling the strings on the puppets we call legislators |
bjobotts |
Nov-05-09 01:11 AM |
#112 |
 
The demands of the public majority are being ignored,They tell us what we want is "not allowed" |
bjobotts |
Nov-05-09 01:13 AM |
#113 |
 
Our best response is to make them look foolish by public demostrations and pressure because |
bjobotts |
Nov-05-09 01:15 AM |
#115 |
 
because Dollars are not votes.We won't reelect Bush but we will get better dems. |
bjobotts |
Nov-05-09 01:16 AM |
#116 |
  
This Rahm Emanuel Presidency is not working.The party will defeat itself |
bjobotts |
Nov-05-09 01:22 AM |
#117 |
 
Good term for it! |
Hardrada |
Nov-05-09 03:56 AM |
#130 |
 
I thought it was a Goldman Sachs presidency. Same thing, I guess. nt |
valerief |
Nov-05-09 05:21 AM |
#133 |
 
I'm not the DU police or anything, but if you could maybe... |
Laurab |
Nov-05-09 01:35 PM |
#182 |
 
amen to that |
historian |
Nov-05-09 02:41 AM |
#126 |
 
Because Anericans are at heart a fearful bunch, complacent with their internet, remote control and |
tblue |
Nov-05-09 12:32 PM |
#166 |
 
Nancy's not going anywhere. |
Le Taz Hot |
Nov-05-09 12:18 AM |
#103 |
  
Until we oust the DLC from the party -- and Rahm with it -- we'll get no where . . . |
defendandprotect |
Nov-05-09 03:38 PM |
#206 |
 
It's been time for that |
man4allcats |
Nov-05-09 01:05 AM |
#107 |
 
no one is going to unseat Pelosi |
onenote |
Nov-05-09 08:02 AM |
#143 |
 
and while we are at it, a new leader in the senate as well!! |
Beer Snob-50 |
Nov-05-09 08:17 AM |
#144 |
  
My anti-bacterial floor mop would make a better Senate Majority Leader! |
tblue |
Nov-05-09 12:55 PM |
#171 |
 
How do you make them get a new speaker? What's the process? |
Maraya1969 |
Nov-05-09 09:54 AM |
#151 |
 
A NEW Speaker Isn't Going To Do It... We Need NEW People & THAT'S |
ChiciB1 |
Nov-05-09 04:02 PM |
#213 |
 
Ain't gonna happen, but Jan Schakowsky is my choice. n/t |
change_notfinetuning |
Nov-05-09 04:35 PM |
#222 |

The problem is that the base may be very liberal -- but the Democratic majority includes |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 05:49 PM |
#2 |
 
The problem is that the Democratic Congress includes cowards |
jgraz |
Nov-04-09 05:52 PM |
#8 |
  
Damn .... you were reading my mind |
Angry Dragon |
Nov-04-09 06:05 PM |
#22 |
  
I agree that they should have allowed an up or down vote on single payer. |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 06:12 PM |
#25 |
  
+1. n/t |
Horse with no Name |
Nov-04-09 07:07 PM |
#42 |
 
really? Or might the problem be simply corruption? money from the corporations |
robinlynne |
Nov-04-09 06:01 PM |
#17 |
 
All the Kucinich Amendment does is allow states the *option* of starting a SP system. |
redqueen |
Nov-04-09 06:01 PM |
#19 |
  
I don't know what the voting numbers are with and without that amendment. |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 06:13 PM |
#27 |
 
It's still total bullshit... moderates don't want states even having the *choice*? |
redqueen |
Nov-04-09 06:15 PM |
#29 |
  
Have you surveyed the members of the House on this, as Pelosi has? |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 06:19 PM |
#33 |
 
You're not getting my point. What moderates, in which states |
redqueen |
Nov-04-09 06:24 PM |
#35 |
 
I don't know. And I don't have a way of asking them. Pelosi does. n/t |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 08:02 PM |
#49 |
 
There's no reason to ask them. This is a bullshit, weak-assed excuse. |
redqueen |
Nov-05-09 10:06 AM |
#153 |
 
She's the leader, it's her job to get the votes. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-04-09 10:50 PM |
#82 |
 
Bullshit |
Sebastian Doyle |
Nov-04-09 06:06 PM |
#24 |
  
The issue I was addressing was single payer, not a public option. |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 06:16 PM |
#30 |
   
crickets |
HughMoran |
Nov-04-09 10:09 PM |
#72 |
  
Single payer does NOT eliminate the insurance companies. |
Pab Sungenis |
Nov-05-09 08:25 AM |
#145 |
  
And even their polls.... |
daleanime |
Nov-05-09 01:08 AM |
#109 |
 
The base of the party may be liberal, but the desire for a really robust |
JDPriestly |
Nov-04-09 09:44 PM |
#60 |
 
You don't have to be a liberal to want a decent |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-04-09 10:48 PM |
#81 |
 
The majority want real reform - that's what I hear |
Sinti |
Nov-05-09 01:43 AM |
#123 |
 
I don't buy it. The majority is no longer in the center. |
fasttense |
Nov-05-09 05:14 AM |
#132 |
 
Without the progressives? |
freebrew |
Nov-05-09 08:41 AM |
#147 |
 
You say centrists, moderates, and Independents. I can see why a moderate |
peacetalksforall |
Nov-05-09 10:56 AM |
#156 |
 
the majority of Democrats want single payer. |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-05-09 01:47 PM |
#187 |

Democrats in Congress: You have to give us a REASON TO VOTE FOR YOU. |
AndyA |
Nov-04-09 05:49 PM |
#3 |
 
Bullshit. Up to 80% of support for a public option |
debbierlus |
Nov-04-09 05:54 PM |
#9 |

Yes, but you were talking about single-payer, not a public option. |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 06:17 PM |
#32 |

I did a very quick search and found: |
dflprincess |
Nov-04-09 09:25 PM |
#55 |

Interesting. Thanks! n/t |
pnwmom |
Nov-04-09 09:47 PM |
#61 |

It's obvious |
90-percent |
Nov-04-09 05:50 PM |
#5 |
 
I wish there was some way |
Angry Dragon |
Nov-04-09 06:12 PM |
#26 |
  
off the table |
guyton |
Nov-04-09 11:25 PM |
#90 |
  
dupe |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-05-09 01:54 PM |
# |
  
start a campaign locally, among dems who share your feelings. |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-05-09 01:54 PM |
#188 |
 
so true,...i was talking to a friend of mine the other day who worked for the obama campaign |
noiretextatique |
Nov-05-09 04:35 PM |
#223 |
 
And, sadly, I no longer think |
Golden Raisin |
Nov-05-09 03:54 AM |
#129 |
  
Golden Raisin... I Came To THAT Conclusion Quite Some Time Ago.. |
ChiciB1 |
Nov-05-09 03:48 PM |
#208 |
 
Thats just wrong. We are a democratic republic, when we vote. |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 12:22 PM |
#163 |
  
But we did win in 2008, got majorities and the White House, and they still don't deliver. |
tblue |
Nov-05-09 12:51 PM |
#169 |
 
I don't care what THEY want. What we have to make plain is what WE want |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 01:14 PM |
#174 |
 
We put them in power, but the right jab isn't enough |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 01:17 PM |
#176 |
 
I honestly think it always was, just once in a while the failures of the oligopoly required |
tblue |
Nov-05-09 12:44 PM |
#167 |

Well if you feel that way, why are you here? |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 01:16 PM |
#175 |

K&R |
SammyWinstonJack |
Nov-04-09 05:52 PM |
#6 |

Send E-Mails. Send hundreds of E-Mails. |
ThomWV |
Nov-04-09 05:52 PM |
#7 |
 
I called Kucinich's office and told on her! Maybe he can mention this when he goes on tv |
debbierlus |
Nov-04-09 05:57 PM |
#11 |
  
Contact the DCCC. When you measure your support in $$$$ maybe they'll get the message. |
tblue |
Nov-05-09 12:53 PM |
#170 |
 
dear congress, please completely change everything you are... |
pundaint |
Nov-05-09 01:54 PM |
#189 |

You Might Want To Call The White House Too...... |
global1 |
Nov-04-09 05:54 PM |
#10 |
 
I will. I have had nothing but vacant silence and thank you for your call |
debbierlus |
Nov-04-09 06:00 PM |
#15 |
 
Why would the White House want debate on single-payer when they're against it? |
rudy23 |
Nov-04-09 06:01 PM |
#18 |

Doesn't matter. They might think twice about their suck ass legislation even if they get millions |
debbierlus |
Nov-04-09 06:05 PM |
#23 |
 
Rock on. It's always worth a shot, IMO. |
rudy23 |
Nov-04-09 06:14 PM |
#28 |
 
Exactly - Let The WH Know That If They Don't Support Us In The Form Of...... |
global1 |
Nov-04-09 06:17 PM |
#31 |
 
I made that call debbierlus ... |
zoff |
Nov-05-09 06:22 AM |
#136 |

It doesn't matter what "they want.", they need to hear what "we want" |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 01:20 PM |
#177 |

It doesn't matter what "they want.", they need to hear what "we want" |
demwing |
Nov-05-09 01:25 PM |
#179 |

good for you! |
robinlynne |
Nov-04-09 05:59 PM |
#12 |

There's also one alternative. Visit her office yourself. |
Jkid |
Nov-04-09 05:59 PM |
#13 |
 
Hmmmm. |
debbierlus |
Nov-04-09 06:02 PM |
#20 |
 
No it's not. She refused to meet with her constituents |
EFerrari |
Nov-04-09 09:56 PM |
#66 |

What kind a represenative is she if she does not refuse to meet with her consituents? |
Jkid |
Nov-04-09 10:58 PM |
#84 |

Again, she would only have to resign if she was in any way accountable. |
EFerrari |
Nov-04-09 11:01 PM |
#85 |

So our only option... |
Jkid |
Nov-04-09 11:26 PM |
#91 |

Imho, the way out is election finance reform and that won't happen any time soon. |
EFerrari |
Nov-04-09 11:32 PM |
#92 |

Fax her... |
DearAbby |
Nov-04-09 06:00 PM |
#16 |
 
Do to my third phone call, she knows very well where I stand - |
debbierlus |
Nov-04-09 06:03 PM |
#21 |

KR |
inna |
Nov-04-09 06:22 PM |
#34 |

flash...if they have been INUNDATED with calls |
G_j |
Nov-04-09 06:24 PM |
#36 |
 
They don't care what we want |
leftstreet |
Nov-04-09 06:27 PM |
#37 |

Meanwhile... Via email, Mobilize for Health Care: |
inna |
Nov-04-09 06:35 PM |
#38 |

same thing happened to me about 1 wk ago |
Slit Skirt |
Nov-04-09 06:41 PM |
#39 |
 
Thanks for checking in. I was glad that I kept my head and asked the right question |
debbierlus |
Nov-05-09 12:15 AM |
#101 |

I guess that speaking to her constituents is off the table, too. |
lob1 |
Nov-04-09 07:06 PM |
#41 |
 
Same here. |
Mithreal |
Nov-04-09 07:08 PM |
#43 |

Pelosi's DC office has been doing that for awhile, whenever I tried to inquire... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-04-09 07:09 PM |
#44 |
 
Cowardly. Pathetic. Gross. We really need to do check-ins with each other on actions |
debbierlus |
Nov-05-09 12:21 AM |
#105 |

I understand and share your anger, debbierlus, but really what did you expect?? |
bertman |
Nov-04-09 07:36 PM |
#46 |
 
If enough of us made calls like that - it would give them pause |
debbierlus |
Nov-05-09 12:19 AM |
#104 |

As A Life Long Progressive - Hate To Say, We Told You So |
ProleNoMore |
Nov-04-09 07:42 PM |
#47 |

My Fears are slowly being realized. |
humbled_opinion |
Nov-04-09 07:45 PM |
#48 |
 
This is why they don't want to implement it until 2013. |
Cleita |
Nov-04-09 08:27 PM |
#54 |
 
You won't be "forced" to get health insurance. |
JDPriestly |
Nov-04-09 09:49 PM |
#62 |

Time to phone, fax and email all Democratic members of the House. |
Cleita |
Nov-04-09 08:25 PM |
#53 |

K&R |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored |
Nov-04-09 09:31 PM |
#56 |

Purity trolls are the teabaggers of the left. |
grytpype |
Nov-04-09 09:34 PM |
#57 |
 
Nasty namecallers shutting down dissent are the teabaggers of the left. nt |
glitch |
Nov-04-09 09:42 PM |
#59 |
 
Wow, projecting there much? |
liberation |
Nov-04-09 09:55 PM |
#65 |
 
Your momma. |
EFerrari |
Nov-04-09 09:56 PM |
#67 |
 
You identify yourself by the use of those |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-04-09 11:14 PM |
#86 |
 
At DU, strong advocates for meaningful health care reform are now "Purity Trolls." |
chill_wind |
Nov-05-09 01:24 AM |
#118 |
 
facile cynicism is the hobgoblin of little minds. n/t |
BlancheSplanchnik |
Nov-05-09 10:18 AM |
#154 |
 
Got any substance to go with that statement? |
YOY |
Nov-05-09 03:24 PM |
#201 |

Sen. Maria Cantwell's phones were always off, Voicemail box full |
upi402 |
Nov-04-09 09:35 PM |
#58 |

The congresscritters |
classysassy |
Nov-04-09 09:50 PM |
#63 |

Who is surprised by this in the least? |
EFerrari |
Nov-04-09 09:54 PM |
#64 |
 
Maybe she does not need anyone's vote, there is no way we can match... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-04-09 10:00 PM |
#68 |
  
After that whole round of showing up to meet with her spokesman |
EFerrari |
Nov-04-09 10:03 PM |
#70 |
 
I remember that and you are correct in that we need to remember what ... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-04-09 10:37 PM |
#80 |
 
But her nephew dropped out of the governors race. I wonder why he really did that? Maybe she is |
earcandle |
Nov-04-09 10:08 PM |
#71 |

K&R....hang in there....n/t |
unkachuck |
Nov-04-09 10:02 PM |
#69 |
 
Don't expect to get through anymore than calling businesses, offices or your doctor |
Dirigo |
Nov-04-09 10:13 PM |
#74 |

Are you kidding? Maybe not. I'd be interested to hear from a single constituent |
EFerrari |
Nov-04-09 10:17 PM |
#76 |

Time to hit the fax machines |
rucky |
Nov-04-09 10:09 PM |
#73 |

The fix to keep SP off the table was in by late 2007 ... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-04-09 10:13 PM |
#75 |
 
Presidential Candidate Health Advisors Roundtable - December 12, 2007 |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-04-09 10:32 PM |
#79 |

It happened to me too twice..............pissed me off. |
bkkyosemite |
Nov-04-09 10:20 PM |
#77 |

Pelosi has not been a good leader for reform or change. She |
scentopine |
Nov-04-09 10:32 PM |
#78 |

I send an e-mail to her office. I never get a response. But I let them know. I know |
southernyankeebelle |
Nov-04-09 10:54 PM |
#83 |

Usually when someone won't pick up the phone, |
drm604 |
Nov-04-09 11:15 PM |
#87 |

IMPORTANT - House bill has an actuarial value of 70% ... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-04-09 11:19 PM |
#88 |
 
Wait til the people find out many policies only pay 70% of expenses. n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-05-09 12:08 AM |
#99 |

Have you tried this approach ... |
zoff |
Nov-04-09 11:22 PM |
#89 |
 
No . . . did it help African-Americans not to have a vote -- or women? |
defendandprotect |
Nov-04-09 11:52 PM |
#95 |

The way this bill is going, do we, or they, have a vote now? |
zoff |
Nov-05-09 06:15 AM |
#135 |

NOT VOTING is stupidity . . not a "carrot and stick" . . . |
defendandprotect |
Nov-05-09 03:37 PM |
#205 |

Not good enough of a threat. |
zoff |
Nov-06-09 01:30 PM |
#229 |

Individuals aren't a threat . . . |
defendandprotect |
Nov-07-09 12:48 AM |
#231 |

I'm unclear what your expectations are. |
lumberjack_jeff |
Nov-04-09 11:33 PM |
#93 |

Thank you -- and I've been calling and moved on to answering machines, as well -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-04-09 11:49 PM |
#94 |
 
Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to make the video tonight, but it is coming tomorrow. |
debbierlus |
Nov-05-09 12:05 AM |
#97 |
  
My calls, emails today included ... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-05-09 12:12 AM |
#100 |
 
Last straw...that was in my email today to the WH :) ...had to wait ten... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-05-09 12:06 AM |
#98 |

How did you do with the person who took your comment . . . |
defendandprotect |
Nov-05-09 01:28 AM |
#120 |

Today was different, seemed as if she just wanted the call to end... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-05-09 01:36 AM |
#122 |

Clinton had a good sysem . . . sort of a poll while you waited on issues/policies . .. |
defendandprotect |
Nov-05-09 02:00 PM |
#190 |

Sounds better, this whole thing has been such a scam... n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-05-09 02:05 PM |
#192 |

k i c k |
defendandprotect |
Nov-04-09 11:56 PM |
#96 |

In 2006... |
bvar22 |
Nov-05-09 12:16 AM |
#102 |

Emails can be deleted quite easily |
zalinda |
Nov-05-09 12:31 AM |
#106 |
 
How many of us have fax machines . . . but I noticed a few of the progressive orgs |
defendandprotect |
Nov-05-09 01:30 AM |
#121 |

A lot of printers have a fax option n/t |
zalinda |
Nov-05-09 11:13 AM |
#157 |

David Swanson speaking about a possible vote on Friday for SP... |
slipslidingaway |
Nov-05-09 01:07 AM |
#108 |

Four years ago, Nancy Pelosi made history. |
chill_wind |
Nov-05-09 01:09 AM |
#110 |

"the democratic/liberal base that the party has taken for granted for so long... |
tomp |
Nov-05-09 01:14 AM |
#114 |

Disappointing |
LatteLibertine |
Nov-05-09 01:26 AM |
#119 |

I Feel Like... |
insidejoke |
Nov-05-09 02:30 AM |
#124 |

sad to say but... |
historian |
Nov-05-09 02:35 AM |
#125 |
 
Send them A Parcel & They Might arrest You!! Oh, I Forgot... They Can X-Ray |
ChiciB1 |
Nov-05-09 03:53 PM |
#210 |
 
They won't pay any attention then either |
dflprincess |
Nov-05-09 04:17 PM |
#218 |

I'm glad I bailed when they reappointed Michael Taylor to the USDA |
Grinchie |
Nov-05-09 02:58 AM |
#127 |

flood her snail mail w hard-copy letters and jam her fax machine |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-05-09 03:03 AM |
#128 |

K & R |
democracy1st |
Nov-05-09 04:14 AM |
#131 |

Yet "liberals" and "big government" will be blamed for the bill |
mmonk |
Nov-05-09 06:00 AM |
#134 |

Call the field offices |
JNelson6563 |
Nov-05-09 07:00 AM |
#138 |

K&R!!! Grayson for Speaker!!!!!! |
BrklynLiberal |
Nov-05-09 07:21 AM |
#139 |

Though my hope is that we're NOT being ignore- maybe her office is saving the calls to build a case? |
stlsaxman |
Nov-05-09 07:30 AM |
#140 |

I don't suppose anyone would like to imagine what it's like being one of the inundated staffers? |
Hekate |
Nov-05-09 07:52 AM |
#141 |
 
Thanks for taking the time to write this |
elizfeelinggreat |
Nov-05-09 08:01 AM |
#142 |
 
When experienced staffers listen to callers, they are able to fill in the categories . . . |
defendandprotect |
Nov-05-09 02:06 PM |
#193 |

How much time per caller in a 10-hour day do you think they can give when thousands call? |
Hekate |
Nov-05-09 03:17 PM |
#200 |

I've often been on the phone with a live staffer for more than 1 minute . . . |
defendandprotect |
Nov-05-09 03:35 PM |
#203 |

What do you want her to do? |
Gman |
Nov-05-09 08:33 AM |
#146 |

my experience |
bonnieS |
Nov-05-09 08:48 AM |
#148 |

She's probably flooded with calls from both sides. |
Ganja Ninja |
Nov-05-09 08:51 AM |
#149 |

Wonder how that compares |
Orwellian_Ghost |
Nov-05-09 08:55 AM |
#150 |

Ahh, your first mistake was believing that they DID give a rat's ass about us. |
Javaman |
Nov-05-09 09:56 AM |
#152 |
 
+1 - the charade will continue only as long as it's profitable for vested interests |
Echo In Light |
Nov-05-09 03:26 PM |
#202 |

The corporate paymasters don't want a fair, viable public option. |
Raster |
Nov-05-09 11:33 AM |
#158 |

Need to bring this to the attention of Ed or Rachel -- they won't have any qualms |
gateley |
Nov-05-09 11:52 AM |
#160 |

I Told You So - TOP SECRET INSIDER INFORMATION! |
theFrankFactor |
Nov-05-09 12:14 PM |
#162 |

Absolutely. |
asdjrocky |
Nov-05-09 12:26 PM |
#164 |
 
+1 Rocky! |
saracat |
Nov-05-09 04:15 PM |
#216 |

"Single Payer or Bust" is for buffoons |
Aramchek |
Nov-05-09 12:51 PM |
#168 |

You're doing exactly what we're supposed to do and are being ignored |
Raineyb |
Nov-05-09 12:58 PM |
#172 |

K&R. |
DesertFlower |
Nov-05-09 01:12 PM |
#173 |

Confirmation of what we hoped isn't true |
kaehele |
Nov-05-09 01:20 PM |
#178 |

just forwarded it to rachel@msnbc.com |
shireen |
Nov-05-09 01:26 PM |
#180 |

Send this to Big Eddie, Rachel, and Keith. |
dgibby |
Nov-05-09 01:29 PM |
#181 |

K&R nt |
Laurab |
Nov-05-09 01:36 PM |
#183 |

I have been saying this around here for a few months now: It's time for us to start . . . |
patrice |
Nov-05-09 01:40 PM |
#184 |
 
P.S. And whatever you/we find out about this process issue should be plastered all over the internet |
patrice |
Nov-05-09 01:42 PM |
#185 |

We need to re-establish sovereignty over our government |
pundaint |
Nov-05-09 01:45 PM |
#186 |

Sign Me Up for the Third Party |
swilton |
Nov-05-09 02:04 PM |
#191 |

I respect and admire Speaker Pelosi for keeping things running smoothly in the house for HC |
Politicub |
Nov-05-09 02:08 PM |
#194 |
 
if she's so good at wrangling votes, maybe she could wrangle some for real reform. |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-05-09 02:35 PM |
#199 |

It may not be "real reform" to you, but it will positively impact millions |
Politicub |
Nov-05-09 03:36 PM |
#204 |

"impact" it will. "help"? doubtful. |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-05-09 03:43 PM |
#207 |

Outside of your obvious personal bias against Speaker Peolsi, do you honestly believe... |
Politicub |
Nov-05-09 05:12 PM |
#224 |

my "personal" bias? she's a war profiteer, it's a fact. |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-06-09 12:45 AM |
#228 |

K & R..... |
winyanstaz |
Nov-05-09 02:28 PM |
#196 |
 
I'm thinking Something Like The "People's Party!" If We Could Just Start |
ChiciB1 |
Nov-05-09 04:01 PM |
#212 |

Congratulations to you for figuring out what Nancy Pelosi is really about |
slackmaster |
Nov-05-09 02:30 PM |
#197 |

pelosi = war profiteer & closet pub. recall her. |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-05-09 02:30 PM |
#198 |

I have always said |
dhpgetsit |
Nov-05-09 03:51 PM |
#209 |
 
I've Said It Too... Hundreds Of Times... Just Posted About It Again Up Thread!! |
ChiciB1 |
Nov-05-09 03:55 PM |
#211 |

Who are these people? They are supposed to be representing us? |
janet118 |
Nov-05-09 04:04 PM |
#214 |

Nancy was never on our side. |
FiveGoodMen |
Nov-05-09 04:04 PM |
#215 |

Pelosi takes her orders from the president. Enuf said. |
saracat |
Nov-05-09 04:16 PM |
#217 |

What did you expect from the woman who refused to Impeach Bush no matter the circumstances? |
Motown_Johnny |
Nov-05-09 04:19 PM |
#219 |

I don't see the point of her staff wasting their time listening |
Beregond2 |
Nov-05-09 04:20 PM |
#220 |

This is not new. |
tbyg52 |
Nov-05-09 06:37 PM |
#225 |

Maybe we put a counter someplace on the web... |
cascadiance |
Nov-05-09 06:40 PM |
#226 |

Newsflash: they don't work for you and me |
Generator |
Nov-05-09 07:01 PM |
#227 |

And now Reid is saying no bill before next year... |
winyanstaz |
Nov-06-09 03:19 PM |
#230 |
| 1. Maybe it's time to consider a new Speaker of the House |
 |
Who would be a good, strong candidate to replace Pelosi in the driver's seat?
|
Myrina
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
Plucketeer
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
 |
But we'd have to lock up the most of the Dumbocrats to be able to hand Alan the gavel! 
|
| 45. Grayson doesn't have enough seniority. I say Barbara Lee |
 |
With Majority Leader Kucinich.
Grayson would make a good Whip.
|
 |
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 08:23 PM by Cleita
|
 |
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 08:23 PM by Cleita
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #45 |
| 137. Seniority is, as seniority does. He's got the heart of an old warrior. |
 |
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 06:52 AM by Joe Chi Minh
|
| 165. Yes, but he's nowhere near as skilled at herding cats as someone like Lee would be. |
 |
I love Grayson, but as Speaker there's no way he could throw the kinds of bombs he's been throwing. I'd rather see him challenge Shill Nelson for the Senate in a few years.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #165 |
| 195. In the current climate, I expect you're on the mark. |
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
| 221. from your keyboard to God's monitor |
demwing
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 155. That's funny. Grayson supports the house bill. |
 |
Why would you support him and not Speaker Pelosi?
|
grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #155 |
| 159. Because he will get be on our side, not big crapsurance. |
| 161. Do you think the House bill is crap? |
 |
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 11:59 AM by demwing
And that Pelosi is in the pocket of the Insurance companies?
|
TexasProgresive
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 50. How do you think that you could force that when you can't |
 |
get what you want other wise? Hmm, maybe you could vote for Cindy (that is if you're in Pelosi's district).
|
bjobotts
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
| 111. It's becoming apparent to the entire nation that our democracy is turing into a corporatocracy |
| 112. with its army of lobbyists pulling the strings on the puppets we call legislators |
| 113. The demands of the public majority are being ignored,They tell us what we want is "not allowed" |
| 115. Our best response is to make them look foolish by public demostrations and pressure because |
| 116. because Dollars are not votes.We won't reelect Bush but we will get better dems. |
| 117. This Rahm Emanuel Presidency is not working.The party will defeat itself |
 |
Apathy is his guiding principle and it will only cause us to forget the Bush years and wonder what is better than nothing.
|
| 133. I thought it was a Goldman Sachs presidency. Same thing, I guess. nt |
| 182. I'm not the DU police or anything, but if you could maybe... |
 |
put your thoughts into a single post, or maybe two, instead of always posting one liners as separate posts, I might not skip over all your posts whenever I see them.
|
 |
Why dont imitate Gandhi? Lets have a nation wide strike for a few days. No spending, no buying, no work. This will affect pocket books and then my friends we might just might get some attention
|
| 166. Because Anericans are at heart a fearful bunch, complacent with their internet, remote control and |
 |
oh goody, the mall is open till 10:00! We don't have the guts of the people of Iran, Ukraine, the Amazon.
|
Le Taz Hot
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 103. Nancy's not going anywhere. |
 |
She's Rahm's perfect little puppet. She's in there to do his bidding. Nothing more.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #103 |
| 206. Until we oust the DLC from the party -- and Rahm with it -- we'll get no where . . . |
 |
Obama showed his allegiance to DLC when he eloped with Rahm into White House!
|
man4allcats
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 107. It's been time for that |
 |
for a long time. Pelosi has not changed in the slightest since she declared impeachment to be off the table. Anyone who believes otherwise is living in a fantasy world.
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 143. no one is going to unseat Pelosi |
 |
Dream on, but there isn't a snowball's chance in hell of it happening.
|
Beer Snob-50
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 144. and while we are at it, a new leader in the senate as well!! |
 |
both of them have been useless.
|
| 171. My anti-bacterial floor mop would make a better Senate Majority Leader! |
Maraya1969
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 151. How do you make them get a new speaker? What's the process? |
ChiciB1
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 213. A NEW Speaker Isn't Going To Do It... We Need NEW People & THAT'S |
change_notfinetuning
(238 posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 222. Ain't gonna happen, but Jan Schakowsky is my choice. n/t |
| 2. The problem is that the base may be very liberal -- but the Democratic majority includes |
 |
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 05:49 PM by pnwmom
moderates and centrists and even Independents.
The same is true of the Rethugs. Their base is very right wing -- but to win a majority they have to get support from centrists and moderates and even Independents.
The real majority is in the middle, not with the base of either party.
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 8. The problem is that the Democratic Congress includes cowards |
 |
If they don't want Single Payer, then stand up and vote on it. Let them go on the record as voting against the core interests of their constituency. All this back-room nonsense does is allow the stealth corporatists to keep hiding.
|
Angry Dragon
(551 posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 22. Damn .... you were reading my mind |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 25. I agree that they should have allowed an up or down vote on single payer. |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 17. really? Or might the problem be simply corruption? money from the corporations |
 |
which they use to maintain their power.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 19. All the Kucinich Amendment does is allow states the *option* of starting a SP system. |
 |
Stripping the amendment is absolute bullshit... and I've left many messages on Ms. Pelosi's voice mail saying so... for all the good it does. 
|
| 27. I don't know what the voting numbers are with and without that amendment. |
 |
Pelosi might not have had enough votes for passage with the amendment in there.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 29. It's still total bullshit... moderates don't want states even having the *choice*? |
 |
That's flatly indefensible.
Absolute bullshit.
|
| 33. Have you surveyed the members of the House on this, as Pelosi has? |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
| 35. You're not getting my point. What moderates, in which states |
 |
would vote out a candidate because they simply allowed an amendment which allowed states the choice of starting their own single-payer systems?
That's a bullshit excuse... no moderate is going to face a tougher election because they allowed states this choice. None of them.
|
| 49. I don't know. And I don't have a way of asking them. Pelosi does. n/t |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
| 153. There's no reason to ask them. This is a bullshit, weak-assed excuse. |
 |
It's sad to see the crap getting any kind of credence at all here.
|
sabrina 1
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 82. She's the leader, it's her job to get the votes. |
 |
And if you're saying that the Party of the People doesn't want what the people want, then the people need a new party.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
 |
I am so fucking tired of this DLC "centrist" excuse for everything. Over 75% of this fucking country wants a public option, according to any poll NOT funded by the goddamn insurance criminals.
|
| 30. The issue I was addressing was single payer, not a public option. |
 |
Personally, I support either -- but I've not seen polling that said the majority of Americans support single payer. Have you?
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
 |
Unfortunately, the support for single-payer gets all too often conflated with the public option. Single payer eliminates all the insurance companies - something that's just not going to be considered.
|
Pab Sungenis
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 145. Single payer does NOT eliminate the insurance companies. |
 |
Look at Britain. They still have private insurance as a supplemental for people who want elective care. Even here in the US one of the biggest insurance businesses is "Medicare supplemental" because Medicare simply doesn't cover everything. If we pushed through Medicare Part E, then the insurance companies could still offer supplemental policies.
|
daleanime
(498 posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
| 109. And even their polls.... |
 |
full of crap and spin show 58-59% for PO
|
JDPriestly
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 60. The base of the party may be liberal, but the desire for a really robust |
 |
public option, ( by robust I mean one that anyone can choose) is not a particularly liberal idea. It is popular among many conservatives and liberals alike. We "liberals" are willing to compromise if our point of view is held only by a small minority of people. But the truth is that a very broad spectrum of Americans are sick of the health insurance industry's shenanigans, and we want either single payer or a real public option.
I, like most Americans, have family members who really need a strong public option. How about a four-year old (youngest of three) whose parents are low-income and whose medication costs $80.00 a month? The father's employer provides insurance for the father, but the rest of the family can only afford catastrophic insurance. Must a child born with a serious medical problem doom the entire family to poverty? That is what the lack of a real public option will mean. Why? Because a strong public option is the only way to lower the cost of health care insurance enough to help middle class American families.
Why won't Pelosi and Reid even allow the CBO to determine the relative cost of single payer? Because they know it would be much, much cheaper than their versions of health care reform.
|
sabrina 1
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 81. You don't have to be a liberal to want a decent |
 |
health care system. A majority of Americans want it and that includes even Republicans. My sister is a Republican and she wants it.
I consider myself a moderate, and even Conservative on some issues, and I want it. This attempt to paint all those as the fringe of the party, just isn't going to work.
The real majority already said in ever poll that they want Health Care reform, not Insurance Reform that hands over more money to an already dysfunctional system.
The problem is we have one party and they work for the Corporations. If there's anyone left in the country who doesn't see that by now, it's because they don't want to.
I bet they tried to make it look like only the extreme, wacko leftwing of the party wanted Civil Rights also. I get so sick of this attempt to divide people. This issue is important to everyone and the OP is absolutely right. If Dems continue to ignore the people and cater to Corporations, there is no more reason to be a Democrat.
|
Sinti
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 123. The majority want real reform - that's what I hear |
 |
Nonetheless, leadership requires that you have a vision, and educate people on what that vision is and how we're going to get there. If you don't have this, no one in their right mind should follow - therefore you are not a leader. Obviously you're not going anywhere anyway. I think it's normal to expect more from your elected representatives than to just follow the directives of the middle point of view. How do you get progress without vision? We could straddle the middle and go nowhere forever - and that gets back to leadership. If your ideas are not good enough to be expressed in such a way as to be an obvious good for everyone, then maybe you need new ideas. I don't hear the leadership actually trying to educate their constituencies on the different options they have before them. The information they get is nothing more than press releases from corporations, read by news models who work for other corporations. Their constituencies don't even know what the various options may be. The majority of the information that goes to both the citizen and the representative comes from the industry in question - on any given issue. It seems to be this is just another sign that our politics is kind of broken. 
|
fasttense
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 132. I don't buy it. The majority is no longer in the center. |
 |
It use to be, a couple of years ago. It has shifted to the left.
Look at how the GOP is running. They are pushing a (fake) populist agenda (funded by corporations). There is a huge logic disconnect with what the GOP is doing. They are not real populist so only the right wing nut jobs are attracted to their lies and spin.
There is a huge anti-corporatist, pro-populism rage in America. The GOP sees it and is trying to twist it to suit their purpose. But at the heart of Populism is Liberalism. Populism belongs in the Democratic party. It's a natural fit and America knows it.
This populist rage started at the end of bushes term, at about the time Obama finished up what the bush started by bailing out the uber wealthy bank CEOs and stock holders with our tax dollars.
I live in the heart of RepubliCON land. I can get every conservative I meet to agree with me merely by pointing out how Wall Street was saved while the average guy has to pay the bill. They don't agree with who caused all the problems, but they definitely agree that the government needs to stop giving welfare to the uber rich and do something for the little guy.
When it comes to helping the average worker (and that's what this health care reform is suppose to do) there is no center position anymore. It has moved to the left, yet our Democratic leaders seem blissfully unaware.
Things move quickly in politics and sometimes change overnight. We are now seeing a real left majority in America. Will the Democratic party use it or lose it?
|
freebrew
(202 posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 147. Without the progressives? |
 |
It may not be a majority anymore. I wonder why they are refu$ing to see that($$$$$$)?
|
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 156. You say centrists, moderates, and Independents. I can see why a moderate |
 |
is conservative on fiscal policies. I just don't know enough about Independents. I have now decided that centrists and moderates are a part of the corporate dream - I will have none of it. Corporations, the ones who lie, scheme, and steal from us ARE OUR ENEMY. The ones who want to own all of their piece of the earth resources - all who want to control us and are not that far away from depopulation, repopulation with serfs - worldwide, including in this great supremacist country.
They want our labor for near free - with enough wages to buy entertainment, toys, and losts of bad and modified food.
They want no protests. They want total submissiveness and obedience.
They are hammering us down.
Pelosi is a facilitator. One of MANY.
The worst phrases and words in this country. Bought and paid for. Imperialism. Torture. Wall Street. Spying on the citizens. Immunities. DLC.
|
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 187. the majority of Democrats want single payer. |
| 3. Democrats in Congress: You have to give us a REASON TO VOTE FOR YOU. |
 |
Period.
Sending us to an answering machine isn't going to do it.
Want more losses like yesterday? Keep it up, idiots. We've HAD ENOUGH! We will replace you.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 9. Bullshit. Up to 80% of support for a public option |
 |
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 06:04 PM by debbierlus
This is to the person who stated the majority are not liberal. Not, the poster directly above me. Sorry about the confusion. I am still in my emotional mad mood and posted in the wrong place.
(And, I am sure THEY want the choice, not just 2%)....
Majority for the legalization of pot
Majority for sane environmental policies
Majority against corporate bailouts
Majority want good pay and workplace protection
That, the HUGE lie they so want you to believe.
Don't repeat their lies.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 32. Yes, but you were talking about single-payer, not a public option. |
 |
What percentage of Americans want single-payer? I don't know. Do you?
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 55. I did a very quick search and found: |
 |
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 09:27 PM by dflprincess
and from what I found it looks like 49% to 60% http://www.healthcare-now.org/another-poll-shows-majori... / A New York Times/CBS News poll released last week shows, yet again, that the majority of Americans support national health insurance. The poll, which compares answers to the same questions from 30 years ago, finds that, “59% say the government should provide national health insurance, including 49% who say such insurance should cover all medical problems.”
Only 32% think that insurance should be left to private enterprise
Also this little clip from an article looking at the media's coverage of the health care debate http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/PollMemo.pdf "When given a choice of the current system or one "like Medicare that is run by the government and financed by taxpayers," voters overwhelmingly chose the latter. A solid majority (59%) say they would prefer a national health insurance program that covers everyone, over the current system of private insurance offered to most through their emloyer." This link gives short descriptions of several polls asking about single payer going back to 2003 and has links to more detailed info about the polls. http://www.wpasinglepayer.org/PollResults.html I have found with friends and coworkers who haven't paying as much attention as we do here, that many of them thought "public option" meant single payer and most are not happy to hear it does not. The poll numbers showing 70% of the population supporting "a public option" may include many who think it is single payer - and it certainly includes a lot people who know that's not what the public "option" is and who would prefer Medicare for All.
|
| 61. Interesting. Thanks! n/t |
 |
America is no longer a Democratic Republic. Our elected officials no longer represent the will of the people and no longer act in the best interests of the people they represent.
the correct term for what we have no is an oligopoly, right? Anyway, it sure ain't what they sold us in school about the principals this country is founded on and what we are supposed to stand for and all the reasons all our citizenry fought in all those wars.
Now it's just a government for corporations. The merger of corporation and state is fascism, correct?
America is now a fascist state.
Gosh darn it all.
-90% jimmy
|
Angry Dragon
(551 posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 26. I wish there was some way |
 |
one could charge them with treason. Threatening the welfare of this nation. Not following the constitution. There has to be a way to take back control of this country. By this I do not mean just democrats, but include the republicans that really want their country back also. For years it has not mattered which party was in office the American people got the pointed end of the stick.
|
 |
Pelosi has been plainly treasonous ever since she had her 'impeachment is off the table' moment.
Talk about ignoring the constitution and giving a green light to any abuse of power by the exec branch!
Congress == a wholly owned subsidiary of big business.
|
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:54 PM
Original message |
 |
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 01:54 PM by Hannah Bell
|
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
| 188. start a campaign locally, among dems who share your feelings. |
 |
it might at least generate some bad publicity.
i'd bet there are a lot of disillusioned local dems regretting busting their asses for this outcome.
|
noiretextatique
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #188 |
| 223. so true,...i was talking to a friend of mine the other day who worked for the obama campaign |
 |
and she was saying how disappointed she is. still hopeful, but very disappointed.
|
Golden Raisin
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 129. And, sadly, I no longer think |
 |
writing, emailing, calling Congresspeople or signing petitions, or any of those quaint, old-fashioned components of what used to be democracy do a damn thing. The electorate basically only exists to elect and re-elect the Congresspeople. Once in the electorate is scorned.
|
| 208. Golden Raisin... I Came To THAT Conclusion Quite Some Time Ago.. |
 |
I pictured them up there LAUGHING at all of us because "we just will NEVER know" IF OR WHAT they decided to listen to. We can call, write, petition, stand on our heads and spit wooden nickles and STILL YOU JUST DON'T know if your voice has been heard!
AND, even IF they hear the voices... THEY don't give a tinker's DAMN!
I know it's like a broken record for me, but I say it all the time to my husband and those around me... NOTHING is going to get their attention until there's a HUGE uprising! People say it doesn't work anymore, but I say... NOTHING IS working NOW so what's to lose??
They sit up there high and mighty and almost KNOW we are almost helpless to replace them... they HAVE the money, they HAVE the people who keep GIVING them money (the big guys) and they HAVE people who know more people who can GIVE THEM MORE MONEY!!
They SAY they will listen to us, they SAY call us with your concerns, they SAY they work FOR THE PEOPLE, but even when some of their own TRY to get WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT... THEY screw them over!
I wonder how long it's going to be before they "skewer" Grayson??
Trying to "kick them out" is MUCH HARDER than most here think!! I've been thinking for quite some time that I should become an Independent, but would have to give up my right to vote in a primary here. Now, that doesn't seem so important these days! I'm SURE I'm to the LEFT of what is being called Progressive, and I KNOW I'm to the left of Obama... so defection seems to be the only sane answer for the most part. At least I won't have to continually be put down and ignored by Democrats who I THOUGHT were standing up for us!!
My house is so silent these days because I can't STAND to listen to MSM spewing crap, and even those on "OUR" SIDE aren't having much affect either! Olberman, Maddow, etc. They ARE trying, but it AIN'T working! Even the guests they have on who truly mean well, actually know what will go down in the end!
I LOVE Howard Dean, but even he says Health Care MUST be passed and it seems it doesn't matter WHAT'S in it... JUST GET SOMETHING PASSED!
JMHO!
|
demwing
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 163. Thats just wrong. We are a democratic republic, when we vote. |
 |
Why did we win VA in 2008? - Voter turnout Why did we lose that state in 2009? - Voter turnout. What is the REAL grease on the gears of democracy? - Voter turnout. Who REALLY owns this government? We do.
If we were not a democratic republic, do you think that Obama would be in office? I don't. We have to stop blaming the world win we lose. If shitty healthcare reform gets passed, it's OUR fault for not getting out this year and sweeping the elections.
It's not Obama's fault for not motivating his base. It's not Pelosi's fault. It's not Reid's fault. It's not Rahm's fault. It's not Rush's fault. It's not Palin's fault.
The voters are responsible for holding their elected officials accountable. If Politicians don't feel threatened by voter turnout is it because they are confident that they are doing a wonderful job and the voters are happy with the work being done, or because they know the voters are lazy and don't really give a damn as long as no one cuts the fast food, TV and Internet access?
Cheeseburgers and porn. Those are the real weapons of Corporate America. And those weapons only have power because we give it to them. Wait, we BUY it from them.
The system isn't broken - the voters just don't care. But since we are the voters, who should we blame?
|
| 169. But we did win in 2008, got majorities and the White House, and they still don't deliver. |
 |
How is that our fault? They keep moving the bar. 51 senators is not enough. Now 60 is not enough. They keep moving the bar.
They don't want single payer. They don't really want a public option either. How plain do they have to make it?
|
| 174. I don't care what THEY want. What we have to make plain is what WE want |
 |
now if we don't do that, whose fault is it?
The founders didn't care what King George wanted. They made it clear what they wanted, and forced England to comply. We are in a much better position than the colonists, but we can't do anything to change our fate?
How has ANY entrenched power responded to change? How has any opressed people wrested that change regardless?
I'm not advocating violent overthrow -nope. We live in a Democratic Republic, and we can vote the fuckers out, or at the very least scare the crap out of them.
Despite the wins and losses this election year, did we scare the crap out of any politicians?
If voter turnout is only at 50% of last year, are we doing OUR job?
|
| 176. We put them in power, but the right jab isn't enough |
 |
we have to have the left hook in place, and let them know that we can take their asses right back out again.
|
tblue
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 167. I honestly think it always was, just once in a while the failures of the oligopoly required |
 |
FDR/intervention to keep the corporate state machine running. I do think FDR and some politicians had/have good intentions, but this country was never about equality for the masses or genuinel democracy. It's an ideal for us and it gives us hope, but it's just a nice-sounding slogan for the entitled who rule over us.
|
| 175. Well if you feel that way, why are you here? |
 |
That's a pretty hopeless situation you've described. Should we just give up and be ruled?
|
| 7. Send E-Mails. Send hundreds of E-Mails. |
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 11. I called Kucinich's office and told on her! Maybe he can mention this when he goes on tv |
 |
I called his staff (so polite, so respectful, so empathetic - night and day with the Pelosi cowards)...
I told the staff that he ought to know Pelosi has made it her policy to NOT take calls about the Weiner & Kunicin, they say they have received so many, the staff just puts them through to voicemail. I wanted him to know that people are listening and calling to the point of inundation. And, I wanted to let him know that even when we call, they refuse to talk to us.
I thought if he was on tv, he might point this out to the American public.
|
| 170. Contact the DCCC. When you measure your support in $$$$ maybe they'll get the message. |
pundaint
(261 posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 189. dear congress, please completely change everything you are... |
 |
These people are beyond repair, we need fresh new people. Replace congress in 2010.
|
| 10. You Might Want To Call The White House Too...... |
 |
here is the number: 1-202-456-1111. Every time I've called I gotten a live person and they listen and some ask follow-up questions. You should tell them of the treatment you are getting from Pelosi and push for the WH to influence her to reinstate debate on the single payer.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 15. I will. I have had nothing but vacant silence and thank you for your call |
 |
Everytime I call...
I will call anyway.
I never have received a followup question. Ever. And, I call a LOT.
Maybe it is because my calls are pretty much statements, not questions.
|
| 18. Why would the White House want debate on single-payer when they're against it? |
 |
I'd think the White House has Pelosi's back on this.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 23. Doesn't matter. They might think twice about their suck ass legislation even if they get millions |
 |
of calls....
Of course, he has got her back. I know that very well.
I am calling to let him know that WE won't have their back, if they keep this SHIT up.
|
| 28. Rock on. It's always worth a shot, IMO. |
 |
They're getting very arrogant about taking our support for granted.
|
global1
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 31. Exactly - Let The WH Know That If They Don't Support Us In The Form Of...... |
 |
single payer or at least a very strong public option - we won't support them. I'm sorry. I hope the WH got the message last night. I think they were taking us for granted - still riding off the glow of last year. But they've got to see that we're smarter than they give us credit for - and if they don't listen to us people - the voters - then they might just be looking for a different job next election. We have the power and if they don't think we have it in us to vote them out - Yes We Can.
|
| 136. I made that call debbierlus ... |
 |
... that WE won't have their backs next election. It's the only currency they understand.
|
demwing
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 177. It doesn't matter what "they want.", they need to hear what "we want" |
 |
or they will keep giving us what "they want" and call it a good day.
|
demwing
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 179. It doesn't matter what "they want.", they need to hear what "we want" |
 |
or they will keep giving us what "they want" and call it a good day.
|
| 13. There's also one alternative. Visit her office yourself. |
 |
She will probably not listen to your voice messages. And if she refuses to answer or stonewalls you in anyway, you expose that to your local media and everyone you know.
If that day comes and Nancy refuses to consider a debate, her political carrier is finished of dereliction of public duty of her constituents.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 66. No it's not. She refused to meet with her constituents |
 |
for the last years of the Bush presidency. There are ZERO consequences to her.
|
| 84. What kind a represenative is she if she does not refuse to meet with her consituents? |
 |
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 10:58 PM by Jkid
Yet, proudly wants to meet with her lobbyists who will fund her campaign fund? She needs to resign, NOW.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #84 |
| 85. Again, she would only have to resign if she was in any way accountable. |
 |
As far as I can tell, she isn't.
Btw, it doesn't please me in the least to notice this. It just seems to be a fact.
|
| 91. So our only option... |
 |
...is for someone with the balls enough to challenge her seat in the next upcoming election.
Unbelievable.
THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #91 |
| 92. Imho, the way out is election finance reform and that won't happen any time soon. |
 |
I sincerely am sorry to be such a downer. But you can't challenge that kind of money without an equal amount of money.
A primary "challenge" is pie in the sky.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 21. Do to my third phone call, she knows very well where I stand - |
 |
And, I have faxed and emailed.
I always try to call and speak personally with a live human being.
|
| 36. flash...if they have been INUNDATED with calls |
 |
that should be telling them what the people want.. 
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
| 37. They don't care what we want |
 |
They care what the ruling class and its lobbyists want
|
| 38. Meanwhile... Via email, Mobilize for Health Care: |
 |
Via email, Mobilize for Health Care: Dear Friend, CALL PELOSI NOW! (415) 556-4862 and (202) 225-0100 There are 8 people sitting in RIGHT NOW in Nancy Pelosi's Office in San Francisco!
They are not leaving until they get an answer to their demands! Their demands are that the Kucinich amendment MUST be in the health care bill that the House votes on, and that the House MUST vote on the Weiner amendment.
Pelosi PROMISED the American people that she would ensure BOTH of the above would happen, and she has betrayed us by renigging on those promises!
YOU can HELP! Call her office in SF at (415) 556-4862 and Washington, DC (202) 225-0100; demand that she talk with the people sitting in. Demand that she keep her promises and put Kucinich Amendment in bill and allow Floor vote on the Weiner Amendment!
Burn up her phone lines people! This is NOT business as usual! This is FOR REAL - we can make a difference in the future of health care in this country!
Thanks,
The Mobilization Team
here's their website: http://mobilizeforhealthcare.org / I even might do one of these sit-ins, btw... (I'm in San Francisco)
|
| 39. same thing happened to me about 1 wk ago |
 |
and then i got pissed sent emails to all i could think of...no kucinich amendment, no weiner vote...no STRONG PUBLIC OPTION...YOU WILL ALL PAY HEAVILY IN 2010 and 2012. I mean it too. i will work my ass off for an independent whoever....i am sick of this crap
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 101. Thanks for checking in. I was glad that I kept my head and asked the right question |
 |
I was glad to have asked the right question, and I was able to confirm my suspicions.
I forgot to report in the original post that I told him that I was a VERY active member of the blogosphere and I would be reporting to the people about this call - he got very nervous and asked if the call was being recorded. I told him no, and I was being honest.
I let him hear it for all the people who have been basically hung up on (being put through to voice mail), loud and very clear. I hope he passes along the message.
I would ask of all you to keep calling and demand to talk to a real human being before you proceed. I will make the video tomorrow. I will be posting it. We all need to be very loud and annoying, they need to start taking us seriously and they need to hear the anger (at this injustice) in our voices.
Enough is too much.
|
| 41. I guess that speaking to her constituents is off the table, too. |
 |
She took it on her own to take bush impeachment off the table. She didn't ask or care how we felt about that, either. I'm no Pelosi fan.
|
Mithreal
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
| 44. Pelosi's DC office has been doing that for awhile, whenever I tried to inquire... |
 |
about the CBO score for single-payer. They have been dragging their feet on an estimate for months now, if you do not give people the information then they cannot make an informed choice - and we have to protect the for profit companies as they play a valuable role in our system. 
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #44 |
| 105. Cowardly. Pathetic. Gross. We really need to do check-ins with each other on actions |
 |
So, these scum bag tactics are revealed early on.
|
| 46. I understand and share your anger, debbierlus, but really what did you expect?? |
 |
They ignore us until they need money and votes, then the phone starts ringing and we start hearing about Republican obstructionism.
It's all BULLSHIT. They do what their corporate sponsors want. Pelosi is a RICH WOMAN. She isn't going to do anything to jeopardize her wealth or her corporate-sponsored funding.
Thank you for your efforts. I too am getting sick and tired of this.
Every day that this so-called healthcare reform gets pushed back is another day that people lose interest and say "WTF, they don't care what WE want."
REC.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
| 104. If enough of us made calls like that - it would give them pause |
 |
They may actually believe there would be real consequences from the 'base'. They are so damn smug with there attitude 'where they gonna go?'. They know we won't vote Republican. And, many have believed that the best way to push change would be to do it through the democratic party. It has become crystal clear that this tactic is not working.
We can't keep beating our head against the wall...over and over and over...
It is time to fight. We have not yet begun.
|
| 47. As A Life Long Progressive - Hate To Say, We Told You So |
 |
Look forward to your YouTube video.
|
| 48. My Fears are slowly being realized. |
 |
Health Insurance reform is starting to look like a big ponzi scheme for the Insurance companies.
Problems in order of importance.
1. There is no Single Payer Medicare rate reimbursed plan. 2. Mandated Health Insurance (Unconstitutional to force me to get insurance) 3. Penalties for non-compliance to #1 4. Watered down Public Option which is going to still cost alot. 5. Employers are not being forced to pay 100 percent for health care. 6. Employers are allowed to opt out of covering employees by paying a small fine. 7. Employers are not being forced to increase pay for employees to help them offset the cost of mandated insurance, public or private option.
Look I know the costs of insurance are doubling and are unsustainable but I think if our leaders are not going to get us a system that will actually work for the middle class and working poor then screw it. Re-focus on lowering costs and supplementing income so the middle class and working poor can afford health care.
Our Leadership the Democratic leaders will be the ones that get hammered if a half assed attempt at reform gets passed. Its all in time. Obama needs to be up on the Hill every night for the next 2 weeks getting us a single payer medicare rate reimbursed plan where they can continue to take my medicare tax dollars and give me health insurance. This country put a man on the moon for christ sake don't tell me we can't do this.
|
| 54. This is why they don't want to implement it until 2013. |
 |
I'm sure they are hoping they can quietly make it go away before then, when no one is looking.
|
JDPriestly
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
| 62. You won't be "forced" to get health insurance. |
 |
Your taxes will be increased unless you pay for the insurance and thereby become eligible for a tax credit for part of the cost. That is how they will get around the constitutional issue. They will use the tax and spend power.
|
| 53. Time to phone, fax and email all Democratic members of the House. |
 |
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 08:25 PM by Cleita
When their office communications become jammed with angry voters, they will line up outside of Pelosi's office and ask  is going on.
|
| 57. Purity trolls are the teabaggers of the left. |
| 59. Nasty namecallers shutting down dissent are the teabaggers of the left. nt |
liberation
(611 posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
| 65. Wow, projecting there |