garybeck
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 03:59 PM
Original message |
| Radical idea? Cap profits on insurance companies. |
 |
Why not just put a cap on the profits for the insurance companies. It could be a percentage of net revenues. If they go over, the excess goes into a fund to low income people obtain coverage (to help pay for the public option).
|
handmade34
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
make it illegal for an insurance company to profit at all and then cap wages of the CEO and other execs
|
FiveGoodMen
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Brigid
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. More radical idea yet: |
 |
Single-payer. Lets do it.
|
handmade34
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
iceman66
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. That's actually in the House bill. |
 |
If it passes as written, 85% of premiums will have to go toward actually providing health care. This amounts to a cap on profits.
|
el_bryanto
(965 posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Unworkable and it would be seen by many as somewhat un-American |
 |
If a company is getting profits they don't deserve by gaming the system than close those loopholes and regulate it more (and introduce a public option to keep them honest).
Single Payer is better than this proposal in several ways.
Bryant
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 21st 2009, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |