gatorboy
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:52 AM
Original message |
| "Let's just call it an interracial civil union." |
 |
Ugh. Good thing some of the "progressives" here weren't around during the 60's. They would have enjoyed giving minorities all sorts of "alternative" choices, eh?
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Feel like I walked into the middle of a conversation. |  |
VMI Dem
(544 posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Yeah, separate but equal is ok. |
 |
I mean, its equal, right?
|
gatorboy
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
 |
And leaving civil rights up to the states has always worked!
Oy.
|
OffWithTheirHeads
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Ding, ding, ding! I got it. |
 |
I'm a 59 year old, straight white guy who pretty much grew up in San Francisco. My attitude toward other folks sexual proclivities is that I don't care if you fuck goats as long as nobody gets hurt and you don't scare the horses but I never really got the whole "it has got to be called marriage" thing until now. Thanks for turning the light on.
|
tblue37
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. So-called separate but equal institutions for the "other." nt |
RoadRage
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. I know a guy in LA. who may or may not preside over that civil union.. |
 |
actually... he just resigned yesterday, so nevermind.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Nov 24th 2009, 12:23 AM
Response to Original message |