So with the administration cutting off federal funding of Abstinence-only sex ed

[DainBramaged]

Poll question: So with the administration cutting off federal funding of Abstinence-only sex ed

should we tax condoms to help pay for educating those not studied in birth control and disease prevention? Shouldn't the burden be placed on those who have the most sex?

<-------sacred rubbers


<----pies you bake

[rucky]

1. okay, you win. n/t

[DainBramaged]

6. Do I get a prize?????

[peace13]

2. I picked WTF.....that is We Tax *ucking isn't it? n/t

[DainBramaged]

4. Yup yup yup yup

DING DING DING DING


you win today's prize

[peace13]

8. Sweet! n/t

[AndyA]

3. Uh...what is abstinence?

And what does it have to do with sex?

I'll ask Bristol Palin to explain it to me, because I'm sure her Mom Sarah is busy depositing checks.

:sarcasm:

[Hello_Kitty]

5. Tax them?? Shit, we should be handing them out for free.

They would pay for themselves several times over with the money saved from treating STDs and unplanned pregnancies.

[Ozymanithrax]

7. No, we should tax only those that say they have the most sex.

I approve the the administrsation ending that monumental waste of tax money.

[DainBramaged]

9. What about not having any sex??? Shouldn't those people share the burden??

:shrug: