Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYC mayoralty : Republican Bloomberg has spent 85 Miillion so far.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 05:51 PM
Original message
NYC mayoralty : Republican Bloomberg has spent 85 Miillion so far.
Edited on Sat Oct-24-09 06:01 PM by Smarmie Doofus
From the "money doesn't talk it swears" dept. Strangely... or maybe not so strangely... the story appeared in the hard-copy version adjacent to "Arizona May Put all State Prisons in Private Hands".

Pretty soon you'll be telling me that they want to sell-off the public school system.

What's that you say?

Anyway... Obama and the DC Party elite seem blissfully unconcerned. He was here... in the *CITY* last week on a *fundraising* mission and failed to appear with ( let alone raise money for) Bloomberg's opponent, DEM nominee Comptroller Bill Thompson.

Hmmm... not exactly the sort of leadership I was expecting from President Transformational.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/nyregion/24mayor.html?hpw


>>>>>>>Bloomberg Sets Record for His Own Spending on Elections

Michael Appleton for The New York Times
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, whose campaign has spent $322,521 on food, treated Colin Powell to a hot dog on Friday.

Bloomberg Sets Record for His Own Spending on Elections

Michael Appleton for The New York Times
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, whose campaign has spent $322,521 on food, treated Colin Powell to a hot dog on Friday.


By MICHAEL BARBARO and DAVID W. CHEN
Published: October 23, 2009
Michael R. Bloomberg, the Wall Street mogul whose fortune catapulted him into New York’s City Hall, has set another staggering financial record: He has now spent more of his own money than any other individual in United States history in the pursuit of public office.



Michael Appleton for The New York Times
Reporters scrutinized documents from the Bloomberg campaign showing that the mayor has spent $85 million on the race so far.

Newly released campaign records show the mayor, as of Friday, had spent $85 million on his latest re-election campaign, and is on pace to spend between $110 million and $140 million before the election on Nov. 3.

That means Mr. Bloomberg, in his three bids for mayor, will have easily burned through more than $250 million — the equivalent of what Warner Brothers spent on the latest Harry Potter movie.

The sum easily surpasses what other titans of business have spent to seek state or federal office. New Jersey’s Jon S. Corzine has plunked down a total of $130 million in two races for governor and one for United States Senate. Steve Forbes poured $114 million into his two bids for president. And Ross Perot spent $65 million in his quest for the White House in 1992 and $10 million four years later.

“I have never seen anything like this — it’s off the charts,” said Jennifer A. Steen, a lecturer in political science at Yale who has studied self-financed candidates for the last decade. “He’s in a league of his own.”

Mr. Bloomberg has used his wealth, estimated at $16 billion, to establish what appears to be insurmountable financial dominance in the race.

He has spent at least 14 times what his Democratic rival in the race, William C. Thompson Jr., has: $6 million. A Thompson campaign spokeswoman on Friday called the mayor’s spending “obscene.”

Since late September, the pace of Mr. Bloomberg’s spending has drastically accelerated: He is now sending nearly $1 million a day into the city’s economy. The bulk of the money is devoted to advertising on television, radio and the Web, but much of it bankrol ls a first-class approach to parties, snacks and travel.

The campaign has spent $322,521 on food, $293,953 on transportation, $176,066 on furniture and $39,858 on parking.

His lavish spending has confounded political consultants and campaign finance experts, who said that his popularity with New Yorkers, and his built-in advantages as a two-term incumbent, should be sufficient to win him re-election.

“The main thing money does is allow you to get name recognition,” said Meredith McGehee, policy director of the Campaign Legal Center, a watchdog group in Washington. “But in this case, with Bloomberg, because he’s so well known, it’s more like, he can do it, so why not?”

With more than 100 employees, his campaign now has a staff larger than 97 percent of all businesses in New York City. And his political operation has become a one-man economic stimulus program, buying $8,892 worth of pizza from Goodfellas Brick Oven Pizza on Staten Island and in the Bronx. The company had suffered a big drop in business since the start of the recession.

“It’s a huge help,” said Marc Cosentino, one of the owners of Goodfellas. “They don’t have to economize like everyone else.”

Squier Knapp Dunn, the media company responsible for the mayor’s television ads, has taken in $48,313,776. While most of that money pays for TV time, media companies typically receive fees of about 15 percent.

“A number of firms are practically living off of this,” said Steve Malanga, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

The spending has drawn howls of protest from good-government groups and advocates of campaign finance reform. In interviews, several said, angrily, that the mayor’s decisions to rewrite New York City’s term limits law and then spend wildly to secure re-election, have undermined democratic principles.

“Whether Bloomberg wins or loses, the toxic combination of mega-spending and crass use of his office to bypass the voters on term limits will always be a stain on his mayoralty,” said Gene Russianoff, staff attorney for the New York Public Interest Research Group.

“These twin assaults on municipal democracy will undermine his political clout in a third term and sadly fuel public skepticism about elections and elected officials,” Mr. Russianoff said.

A spokesman for Mr. Bloomberg’s campaign, Howard Wolfson, defended the spending, saying, “Voters in this race have a choice between one candidate who is independent and doesn’t take a dime from special interests and another who practices politics as usual.”

Mr. Thompson, a Democrat, has had the unenviable task of trying to raise money in the middle of a deep recession, when many voters already assume that Mr. Bloomberg will prevail. Their lack of enthusiasm for Mr. Thompson’s candidacy was reflected in his latest campaign finance disclosure, which showed he had raised $270,000 over the last three weeks.

While donations came in at a much brisker pace than in the previous three-week reporting period, when he raised $114,000, that is unlikely to make a dent in Mr. Bloomberg’s advantage. Factoring in public matching funds, Mr. Thompson will have $3 million in the final week and a half of the race.

“This is a clear indication that the momentum of the mayoral race continues to shift towards Bill Thompson,” said Mike Murphy, a spokesman for the Thompson campaign.

But Mr. Thompson’s fund-raising still badly trails that of the two last Democrats who lost to Mr. Bloomberg: the former public advocate, Mark Green, and Fernando Ferrer, the former Bronx borough president.

The newly released records show that Mr. Bloomberg is handsomely rewarding top aides who take leaves from their City Hall posts to join the campaign. His first deputy mayor, Patricia E. Harris, is earning about $28,000 a month. It is a healthy raise: At City Hall, she made about $21,000 a month.

The mayor also typically showers the aides with additional bonuses after Election Day.

(more at link)>>>>>>

If you think this sort of thing might be... I don't know.... perhaps a DANGEROUS TREND (!), you might want to help even the odds.

Contribute to Thompson here:


http://www.thompson2009.com/site/home/?source=sourcegoogle&subsource=subsourceBill%20Thompson%20For%20Mayor&gclid=CN3CkL7j1p0CFc5L5QodGWP4rg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I won't vote for him. My mom won't vote for him.
And I have very little respect for the NY Dems that decided to run a nonentity against him. I'm just furious. I want the vote so close that the idiots will realize they could have won, even with all Bloomberg's money against them, if they had just TRIED.

The other dangerous trend is present Gillibrand as a fait accompli. NO primary for this appointee. If you want a Democrat, you have to vote for her. No. I don't. She doesn't need my vote in a primary? Then she doesn't need my vote in the general. I won't vote Republican, I will leave it blank. That's what disenfranchisement is: NO VOTE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thompson's far from my first choice but he's more than a ....
... nonentity. He's been "around", comes from distinguished DEM family, has served in various capacities and has done so without any serious allegations of incompetence or impropriety.

I agree *totally* with your 2nd paragraph. ( Except I *may* vote for her, depending on whom the opposition runs). The state party bosses are increasingly autocratic, elitist and.... frankly.... out of touch with the ideals of the nat'l DEM party.

They're also flat-out stupid.

I stopped sending them money after they defeated a resolution at the state convention ( 2006?) calling for an end to the Iraq war. If they continue to impose flawed, mediocre candidates on us and then tell us we can't have a contested primary , they can call Bloomberg for money; I'll continue sending mine elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. A grotesque sum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Better His Money Than Ours...
Yes, this is an obscene amount to waste on the job, but I'd rather see him flush it down that rathole than donate it to rushpublican pacs and other clandestine fronts like a Koch or DeVos. I also hope all that money goes to waste, however from all I've read and heard, Thompson is a weak candidate...there hasn't been a Democratic mayor of New York since Koch...and many will argue that he wasn't much of a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agree on all counts.
I'm still pouting that Mark Green did not become Mayor of New York.

I doubt if I'll ever get over it, either.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 9/11 Did Him In...
I donated to Mark's campaign and while I don't know if he would have won, having the WTCs destroyed on election day sure didn't help.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Bloomberg's $$$ creates incalculable damage.

See the link.


http://www.observer.com/4857/thompson-points-bloombergs-republican-ties


Also ... this just the $$$ that we *know* about. There's lots more that goes on outside of the public eye. My favorite was when he Freudian slipped that the ever-compliant Council Speaker Christine Quinn was destined for a great future in the private sector some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It Sure Isn't 85 million...
Open Secrets is our friend:

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.php?name=Bloomberg%2C+Michael&state=NY&zip=&employ=&cand=&all=Y&sort=N&capcode=vhdhs&submit=Submit

While the article states there "may" be, Open Secrets shows a different story. The only damning thing I found was a #250g contribution to the RNC in 2002...but if you look at his individual donations, I see names like Al Gore, Gary Ackemann, Kirsten Gilbrand (in June) and Joe Sestak. And those are documented donations.

I'm no fan of Bloomberg and wish the New York City Democratic party would get its shit together...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hmm..... interesting. But where's the 500,000 $ check Bloomberg wrote...
Edited on Sun Oct-25-09 11:43 PM by Smarmie Doofus
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/nyregion/01bloomberg.html

... to the NYS Republican Party in 2008 to help them keep control of the state senate?
Bloomberg Steps In to Help G.O.P. in Albany Fight


By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ
Published: March 1, 2008
While declaring his commitment to nonpartisanship, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is quietly injecting himself — and his money — into one of the most explosive partisan battles in decades in New York.


Michael Nagle/Getty Images
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg quit the Republican Party in June.
Several weeks ago, the mayor wrote a $500,000 check to help keep the dwindling and increasingly imperiled State Senate Republicans from losing their grip on power, according to an official with direct knowledge of the donation.
The Democrats are seeking to gain control of the Senate for the first time in 40 years, and the race is growing personal and bitter.

Moreover, Mr. Bloomberg has made clear to the Republicans that he is willing to personally campaign for G.O.P. senators.

The mayor’s efforts to buttress the party stand in sharp contrast to his message as he traveled the country flirting with a presidential bid during the past year. Mr. Bloomberg has promoted his independence, denouncing party politics and dramatically announcing his resignation from the Republican Party.

“The politics of partisanship and the resulting inaction and excu>>>>

More at link... if you can stand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. the fucker could save the nyc budget with the money he's spent just on his stupid
campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thread's two days old. Must be 95M by now. Morning kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC