Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Gets Afghanistan Advice From Mothers of Fallen Soldiers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 08:21 AM
Original message
Obama Gets Afghanistan Advice From Mothers of Fallen Soldiers
Source: Bloomberg

Oct. 19 (Bloomberg) -- The commander-in-chief hugged a grieving mother, telling her to be proud of her fallen son, a Marine killed by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan’s Helmand province.

Lisa Xiarhos also had a message for President Barack Obama: “Be strong and get the job done,” she recalls telling him. “Don’t back down. Send more troops. Support the ones that are there and do whatever you can.”


As Obama reviews U.S. strategy for the war in Afghanistan, meeting with generals, Cabinet secretaries and diplomats, he has received informal advice from those most touched by the eight- year conflict: the parents who sacrificed children, the spouses who lost their mates, and the soldiers who left behind limbs.

On Oct. 8, a group of wounded veterans came to the White House for a game of wheelchair basketball, laying their prosthetics against a fence before rolling onto the concrete court. The president marveled at their mechanical dexterity and then shot three-pointers with them. Twenty-five hours later, he was in the White House Situation Room with his war council to discuss a request for additional troops by General Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan.

Obama considers his interaction with disabled veterans and families of the fallen as “sacred,” and leaves the meetings “contemplative” about his overall war strategy, said Matt Flavin, director of the White House Office of Veterans and Wounded Warrior Policy.

The White House doesn’t seek publicity for the private meetings, which often don’t appear on the president’s public schedule.

more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adSj7NtaigGQ

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
There is something very wrong with the mindset that more need to die to ensure that one didn't die in vain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone has a different opinion. Pres. Obama's job is to listen
to the families, and not brush off whatever they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The families may know about suffering, regret and revenge.
Obama should listen and be sympathetic to their emotions, but not listen to their opinions when determining policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Something very wrong indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. The "dying in vain" idea has cost us many brave troops
only to realize, years later, that not only did they die in vain, but for oil or some other resource, or some loopy theory like the domino theory. Sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is exactly
the kind of input LBJ received from on location soldiers in his generation, with the same emotional reaction and I sincerely hope not the same disastrous results. LBJ had his own meager WWII record to compensate for and enormous pressure to go the military route so we may hope Obama will not let it overcome his reason. We did not go there to take and hold territory but to quash Al Qaeda. Quashed they are and generally unsupported by the locals. Even the suppression of the Taliban may not necessitate a Vietnam like occupation strategy. An opportune massive operation against the militant Taliban might be one compromise, but it cannot be a long term nation building strategy and definitely not a simple monument to honor. The British seem willing for another go at the latter and THEIR historical repetition
of this whole affair is even more worth referencing.

I think that we ourselves are torn between the horror of the chickenhawks and hypocrites creating more disastrous death and the harrowing performance of the administration in seriously considering doing the wrong thing. Kerry's presence reminds us that it is not the Kucinich approach but the pragmatist liberal approach that is in the saddle and that answer will hopefully be intelligent and little disposed toward the wasteful and stupid.

Then this supposed to be all about hope and decent people, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. The President is a good man and the seeds have been planted
We'll not be in Afghanistan nor Iraq much longer, hide and watch or take it to the bank or whatever 'cause that's what's coming down the pike here shortly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC