Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polanski NOT a pedophile

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:00 PM
Original message
Polanski NOT a pedophile
the correct term is:

Ephebophile: An adult, usually male, who is sexually attracted to young people about the age of puberty. It is sometimes used as a synonym for "hebephilia."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. It doesn't matter what you call it. He ran away from the law and now he's fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I agree. But throwing the word around wrongly
blurs the very important distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Pedophiles like to have sex with children.
The girl was a child. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of unanswered questions. Just semantics and opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. semantics are important.
a pedophile is attracted to PREpubescents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Or children in general.
Semantics are important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. the American Psychiatric Association draws the distinction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Dictionaries don't. Many here don't. The laws probably differ, if use the term at all.
It's just a question of semantics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Pedophiles seek sex with prepubescent youth. The difference
is more than semantic. There is a significant difference in the criminal code in most states. There is also a different diagnostic label in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. There is a difference between 3 year olds and 13 year olds. In this case were are dealing with a 13 year old who looked far older. She would not have attracted a true pedophile who is repelled by anyone of either sex who is past puberty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Just semantics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. Typically law enforcement uses the word more broadly than psychologists
Law enforcement uses the term to refer to any adult who seeks sexual gratification through a minor. The vernacular use of the term is similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
53. she looked 13
No one who's seen her photo believes she looked older or even far older. She looked like the average 13 year old girl she was. I don't give a flying fuck whether or not a true pediphile would have found her attractive. She looked 13, was 13, and was raped by a creepy pig in his 40's that is attracted to young teenage girls.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. She did NOT look "far older" - see the photo at age 13 posted in another thread.
Rape is rape, BTW>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Important distinction?
Is that like the pedophiles that like little girls who look down on the pedophiles that like little boys?

You "important distinction" is anothers "mincing of words".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. no. they are two different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Isn't the statute of limitations up on that charge? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milspec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. Not for flight from sentencing
He already had plead guilt to raping (vaginally and anally) a 13 year girl after giving her liquor and Drugs and after she said no.
This is not the case at hand, it his flight from justice for these many years. I hope this drags on in the justice system for years, I doubt if bail will be granted with such a flight risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. i bet he rocks out to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Actually, he's a filthy rapist who drugged his victim.
Then, he raped her vaginally and anally.

How's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the correction
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. you are welcome
it is an important distinction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Free Polanski!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. that's sick - i hope you are being sarcastic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Well, I'M not being sarcastic ...
Yeah, 30 years ago he did a bad thing. But now we
want to lock him up? Is he really a danger to society?
Some of his more recent movies have sucked, but come
on, people -- this is simply a cry for VENGEANCE, not
for real justice. The woman in question has forgiven
him; what the hell is wrong with all of you on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. .....
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Word???
you are kidding right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Totally am.
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 07:14 PM by bigwillq
Just having some fun. Polanski is a scum-bag rapist who should pay for his crimes. But I could care less about him and, quite frankly, the victim too. It's not like he's the only man that has ever raped, and she the only girl to have been raped. Horrific crime, indeed. People are so outraged by Polanski now because it's in the news now. Where was all the outrage last week about him on DU? The month before? It's like the Michael Jackson case. Kick a man when's he down or dead and then act all houlier than thou about it, all up on their bully pulpit. Give me a freaking break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. You're right. He's just a rapist.
He's just a guy who drugged and gave alcohol to a 13 year old girl, then raped her orally, vaginally, and anally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. still illegal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. who said it wasn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. The law makes no distinction between the two terms
And that's what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. usually the law DOES distinguish, though I doubt statutes use either term
but YES they distinguish. Do you think if P had sexually assaulted a 5 year old he would be in no more trouble than he is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. I guess that depends on the local statute
Here in Canada, a minor is a minor. The law makes no real distinction between a 5 year old and a 13-year old.

At least not where statutory rape is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. in Texas 14 = statutory rape
<14 = sexual assault of a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Ah
I see now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. In my state the law makes a distinction and the penalties are
much more severe for sexual attacks of very young children than they are for sexual assaults of teens or adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Really? Different laws for different ages of minors?
I never knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. But isn't/wasn't the age of consent 14 in Canada?
Is so that would mesh to a degree, except in the states the age of consent varies. In California is it 18, but under 14 is more serious. So the difference would be that in Canada 14 and over wouldn't be a crime at all, while in California it would be. In California, like Canada, there is not much distinction on the age if under 14, except now there is a mandatory 15 to life if the child is under 12. That is a recent law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Whatever the word is, he's scum.
That girl isn't his only teenage sex object. He also dated then 15 year old actress Nastassja Kinski right after he fled to Europe on those rape charges. It seems he is a serial something or the other. I wonder about how many others there were who never made the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't care what he is, you just don't fuck kids
I have been propositioned by extremely young women, some quite aggressively. The fact a young girl might potentially be an extremely enthusiastic participant doesn't make it any less WRONG.

Laws exist to protect the young from their own stupidity and those who might prey upon it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. Curiously, that could be worse...
if we say pedophilia is a pathology that needs a cure more than punishment, but the cradle-robbing of sexually active teens isn't a disease so much as a rude form of debauchery.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. I already pointed that out elsewhere. Doesn't make it any less wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yes he IS a pedo
The term pedophilia, however, has also been used colloquially to refer broadly to any sexual interest in minors below the legal age of consent, regardless of their level of physical, mental, or psychological development.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. problem with the vernacular
is that a person would or would not have a psychiatric disorder depending on what state they are in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
35. Not to excuse behavior, but questioning case and what was 13 year old doing in photoshoot, mother's
consent and subsequent payoff, as affecting case and her liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. He should be prosecuted as if the alleged crime happened yesterday.
If you killed a guy 30 years ago, is the crime less heinous than if you killed him yesterday?

Don't think so.

Stop it with all the sorrow about this guy. If guilty, he's a child rapist. He should pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. What about the victim? Doesn't she get a say in how much more attention this gets?
She's clearly said she doesn't want this whole thing brought up again. She's a grown woman now, capable of forming an opinion.

why insist on victimizing her yet again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
40. accuracy is not important here.

Too much trouble to be accurate, better to anger up the mob with badly applied terms like pedophile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mixopterus Donating Member (568 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. No kidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. i havent used pedophile once. only he raped a girl. if it was pedophile he raped a really little
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 09:27 PM by seabeyond
girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
44. amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. he raped a girl. i dont need to call it anything but what it is. no prettying it up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
50. Regardless, the law is the law.
I'd say a whole lot of people need to get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
51. He raped a 13 year old child
count me as yet another person who utterly fails to find your erudition relevant or meaningful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
52. Does child rapist work for you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
54. "scumbag" works just fine for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC