Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We are faced with two choices in Afghanistan:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:58 PM
Original message
We are faced with two choices in Afghanistan:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/20090511_becoming_what_we_seek_to_destroy/


....We are faced with two stark choices. We can withdraw and open negotiations with the Taliban or continue to expand the war until we are driven out. The corrupt and unpopular regimes of Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan and Asif Ali Zardari are impotent allies. The longer they remain tethered to the United States, the weaker they become. And the weaker they become, the louder become the calls for intervention in Pakistan. During the war in Vietnam, we invaded Cambodia to bring stability to the region and cut off rebel sanctuaries and supply routes. This tactic only empowered the Khmer Rouge. We seem poised, in much the same way, to do the same for radical Islamists in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

“If the Americans step up the war in Afghanistan, they will be sucked into Pakistan,” Dr. Fournot warned. “Pakistan is a time bomb waiting to explode. You have a huge population, 170 million people. There is nuclear power. Pakistan is much more dangerous than Afghanistan. War always has its own logic. Once you set foot in war, you do not control it. It sucks you in.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Negotiate with the Taliban?
I've got a bridge for sale. It's in Brooklyn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The broad brush term 'Taliban' is misleading.
The Taliban are local groups. Not all of them are horrid. If the moderate ones are welcomed into the political process, progress can be made. The intell folks know which groups are extremists and which ones are reasonable. They are not all one and the same, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Remember it's the "right war" so it's either victory or losing another war ala Vietnam. Been 8 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. We could become their friends again if we could get Russia to
invade again.... just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. how about Leave or Leave ,Health care not warfare.What has it got US
Edited on Fri Sep-25-09 08:03 PM by orpupilofnature57
except more debt and death.The taliban are criminals not a nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's a third choice...
Edited on Fri Sep-25-09 08:04 PM by Ian David


And if THAT fails...








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Okay we play a round of Buzkashi and the winner gets Afghanistan
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 07:11 AM by jakeXT


Bush is afraid of horses that excludes him, but I bet Prince Charles is a good polo player.

I wonder if the Taliban would play it


During Taliban regime of Afganistan, Buzkashi was banned

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzkashi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SilverShield Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. GTFO of Afghanistan
All we are doing there is protecting the CIAs poppy fields...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obliviously Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Oh yes the poppy fields!
Dollar general has aluminum foil on sale cheap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The real concerns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Afghanistan is the size of Arizona, Utah, western Colorado, but has 2.5 times the people
Pakistan is the size of California and Nevada, but has 4.5 times the people.

It's time to leave unless we're ready to do a nuclear decapitation of Pakistan, followed by a full-scale Indian invasion of both countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. If we were not there now and the Taliban was invading Afghanistan and trying to gain control
of the nation, are the Afghani people totally incapable of defending their own country if we were to arm, supply, and support them? Do the Taliban troops outnumber the Afghanis? Does the Taliban have some nation greater than the U.S. that is supporting them to the point that they would have no problem in overrunning Afghanistan? How many more years will the U.S. have to be in Afghanistan to train their army?

With our support, the Afghanis need to fight their own war to keep their own country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm pretty convinced we don't have the time or resources to improve
anything. I vote get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obliviously Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I have to agree.
If I thought we would accomplish something it would be different!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. More on Pakistan from the LA Times (Quotes from McChrystal)
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-afghan-intel20-2009sep20,0,1183243.story


The CIA is also carrying out an escalating campaign of unmanned Predator missile strikes on Al Qaeda and insurgent strongholds in Pakistan. The number of strikes so far this year, 37, already exceeds the 2008 total, according to data compiled by the Long War Journal website, which tracks Predator strikes in Pakistan.

The agency recently submitted a request for additional Predators from the Air Force, which manages the U.S. drone fleet, one official said. For years, the CIA drones were operated from inside Pakistan, but some are also flown from an air base across the Afghan border near Jalalabad.

A drone strike last month killed Pakistan Taliban chief Baitullah Mahsud. U.S. officials said they are watching closely to see whether his death leads to even a temporary drop in the number of suicide bombings.

Mahsud's organization had become a major supplier of suicide bombers to other insurgent groups, training attackers that in some cases would be deployed to carry out strikes in Pakistan or Afghanistan....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC